Literature DB >> 27398828

Feasibility of clinical psychosocial screening in pediatric oncology: Implementing the PAT2.0.

Maria C McCarthy1,2, Claire E Wakefield3,4, Sharon DeGraves5, Madeleine Bowden1, Deborah Eyles1, Lauren K Williams1.   

Abstract

This study examined the feasibility of implementing the Psychosocial Assessment Tool (PAT2.0) from the perspectives of families and health-care providers (HCPs). PAT2.0 data were collected from 104 families. Individual and focus group interviews were conducted with HCPs. Parents reported that the PAT2.0 was brief and easy to complete. HCPs' perspectives on the utility of the PAT2.0 were mixed and varied according to clinical roles. A major perceived benefit was the PAT2.0 as a communication tool. Barriers included timing and an increased workload for social workers. Psychosocial screening represents a significant practice change for oncology HCPs and is an important area of ongoing research.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cancer; feasibility; pediatric oncology; psychosocial; screening

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27398828     DOI: 10.1080/07347332.2016.1210273

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Psychosoc Oncol        ISSN: 0734-7332


  6 in total

1.  Healthcare provider utility ratings of a psychosocial screening summary: from diagnosis to 6 months.

Authors:  Leandra Desjardins; Laurel Etkin-Spigelman; Kelly Hancock; Joanna Chung; Wendy Shama; Denise Mills; Sarah Alexander; Maru Barrera
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2019-07-10       Impact factor: 3.603

2.  Using formative evaluation to plan for electronic psychosocial screening in pediatric oncology.

Authors:  Jordan Gilleland Marchak; Sean N Halpin; Cam Escoffery; Shadé Owolabi; Ann C Mertens; Karen Wasilewski-Masker
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2020-10-20       Impact factor: 3.894

3.  Psychosocial Risk Profiles Among American and Dutch Families Affected by Pediatric Cancer.

Authors:  Christina M Sharkey; Sasja A Schepers; Sarah Drake; Ahna L H Pai; Larry L Mullins; Martha A Grootenhuis
Journal:  J Pediatr Psychol       Date:  2020-05-01

4.  First experience with electronic feedback of the Psychosocial Assessment Tool in pediatric cancer care.

Authors:  Sasja A Schepers; Simone M Sint Nicolaas; Heleen Maurice-Stam; Elisabeth M van Dijk-Lokkart; Esther M M van den Bergh; Nienke de Boer; Chris M Verhaak; Martha A Grootenhuis
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2017-05-11       Impact factor: 3.603

5.  Families following pediatric traumatic medical events: identifying psychosocial risk profiles using latent profile analysis.

Authors:  Yaara Sadeh; Rachel Dekel; Amichai Brezner; Jana Landa; Tamar Silberg
Journal:  Eur J Psychotraumatol       Date:  2022-09-21

6.  What are the attitudes of health professionals regarding patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) in oncology practice? A mixed-method synthesis of the qualitative evidence.

Authors:  Bróna Nic Giolla Easpaig; Yvonne Tran; Mia Bierbaum; Gaston Arnolda; Geoff P Delaney; Winston Liauw; Robyn L Ward; Ian Olver; David Currow; Afaf Girgis; Ivana Durcinoska; Jeffrey Braithwaite
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2020-02-10       Impact factor: 2.655

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.