PURPOSE: Conventional wisdom has rendered patients with brain metastases ineligible for clinical trials for fear that poor survival could mask the benefit of otherwise promising treatments. Our group previously published the diagnosis-specific Graded Prognostic Assessment (GPA). Updates with larger contemporary cohorts using molecular markers and newly identified prognostic factors have been published. The purposes of this work are to present all the updated indices in a single report to guide treatment choice, stratify research, and define an eligibility quotient to expand eligibility. METHODS: A multi-institutional database of 6,984 patients with newly diagnosed brain metastases underwent multivariable analyses of prognostic factors and treatments associated with survival for each primary site. Significant factors were used to define the updated GPA. GPAs of 4.0 and 0.0 correlate with the best and worst prognoses, respectively. RESULTS: Significant prognostic factors varied by diagnosis and new prognostic factors were identified. Those factors were incorporated into the updated GPA with robust separation (P < .01) between subgroups. Survival has improved, but varies widely by GPA for patients with non-small-cell lung, breast, melanoma, GI, and renal cancer with brain metastases from 7-47 months, 3-36 months, 5-34 months, 3-17 months, and 4-35 months, respectively. CONCLUSION: Median survival varies widely and our ability to estimate survival for patients with brain metastases has improved. The updated GPA (available free at brainmetgpa.com) provides an accurate tool with which to estimate survival, individualize treatment, and stratify clinical trials. Instead of excluding patients with brain metastases, enrollment should be encouraged and those trials should be stratified by the GPA to ensure those trials make appropriate comparisons. Furthermore, we recommend the expansion of eligibility to allow for the enrollment of patients with previously treated brain metastases who have a 50% or greater probability of an additional year of survival (eligibility quotient > 0.50).
PURPOSE: Conventional wisdom has rendered patients with brain metastases ineligible for clinical trials for fear that poor survival could mask the benefit of otherwise promising treatments. Our group previously published the diagnosis-specific Graded Prognostic Assessment (GPA). Updates with larger contemporary cohorts using molecular markers and newly identified prognostic factors have been published. The purposes of this work are to present all the updated indices in a single report to guide treatment choice, stratify research, and define an eligibility quotient to expand eligibility. METHODS: A multi-institutional database of 6,984 patients with newly diagnosed brain metastases underwent multivariable analyses of prognostic factors and treatments associated with survival for each primary site. Significant factors were used to define the updated GPA. GPAs of 4.0 and 0.0 correlate with the best and worst prognoses, respectively. RESULTS: Significant prognostic factors varied by diagnosis and new prognostic factors were identified. Those factors were incorporated into the updated GPA with robust separation (P < .01) between subgroups. Survival has improved, but varies widely by GPA for patients with non-small-cell lung, breast, melanoma, GI, and renal cancer with brain metastases from 7-47 months, 3-36 months, 5-34 months, 3-17 months, and 4-35 months, respectively. CONCLUSION: Median survival varies widely and our ability to estimate survival for patients with brain metastases has improved. The updated GPA (available free at brainmetgpa.com) provides an accurate tool with which to estimate survival, individualize treatment, and stratify clinical trials. Instead of excluding patients with brain metastases, enrollment should be encouraged and those trials should be stratified by the GPA to ensure those trials make appropriate comparisons. Furthermore, we recommend the expansion of eligibility to allow for the enrollment of patients with previously treated brain metastases who have a 50% or greater probability of an additional year of survival (eligibility quotient > 0.50).
Authors: Paul W Sperduto; Brian J Deegan; Jing Li; Krishan R Jethwa; Paul D Brown; Natalie Lockney; Kathryn Beal; Nitesh G Rana; Albert Attia; Chia-Lin Tseng; Arjun Sahgal; Ryan Shanley; William A Sperduto; Emil Lou; Amir Zahra; John M Buatti; James B Yu; Veronica Chiang; Jason K Molitoris; Laura Masucci; David Roberge; Diana D Shi; Helen A Shih; Adam Olson; John P Kirkpatrick; Steve Braunstein; Penny Sneed; Minesh P Mehta Journal: Neuro Oncol Date: 2018-11-12 Impact factor: 12.300
Authors: Paul D Brown; Kurt Jaeckle; Karla V Ballman; Elana Farace; Jane H Cerhan; S Keith Anderson; Xiomara W Carrero; Fred G Barker; Richard Deming; Stuart H Burri; Cynthia Ménard; Caroline Chung; Volker W Stieber; Bruce E Pollock; Evanthia Galanis; Jan C Buckner; Anthony L Asher Journal: JAMA Date: 2016-07-26 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Paul W Sperduto; Meihua Wang; H Ian Robins; Michael C Schell; Maria Werner-Wasik; Ritsuko Komaki; Luis Souhami; Mark K Buyyounouski; Deepak Khuntia; William Demas; Sunjay A Shah; Lucien A Nedzi; Gad Perry; John H Suh; Minesh P Mehta Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2013-02-04 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: David W Andrews; Charles B Scott; Paul W Sperduto; Adam E Flanders; Laurie E Gaspar; Michael C Schell; Maria Werner-Wasik; William Demas; Janice Ryu; Jean-Paul Bahary; Luis Souhami; Marvin Rotman; Minesh P Mehta; Walter J Curran Journal: Lancet Date: 2004-05-22 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Eric L Chang; Jeffrey S Wefel; Kenneth R Hess; Pamela K Allen; Frederick F Lang; David G Kornguth; Rebecca B Arbuckle; J Michael Swint; Almon S Shiu; Moshe H Maor; Christina A Meyers Journal: Lancet Oncol Date: 2009-10-02 Impact factor: 41.316
Authors: Paul W Sperduto; Shane Mesko; Jing Li; Daniel Cagney; Ayal Aizer; Nancy U Lin; Eric Nesbit; Tim J Kruser; Jason Chan; Steve Braunstein; Jessica Lee; John P Kirkpatrick; Will Breen; Paul D Brown; Diana Shi; Helen A Shih; Hany Soliman; Arjun Sahgal; Ryan Shanley; William Sperduto; Emil Lou; Ashlyn Everett; Drexell Hunter Boggs; Laura Masucci; David Roberge; Jill Remick; Kristin Plichta; John M Buatti; Supriya Jain; Laurie E Gaspar; Cheng-Chia Wu; Tony J C Wang; John Bryant; Michael Chuong; James Yu; Veronica Chiang; Toshimichi Nakano; Hidefumi Aoyama; Minesh P Mehta Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2020-02-19 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: T M Churilla; E Handorf; S Collette; L Collette; Y Dong; A A Aizer; M Kocher; R Soffietti; B M Alexander; S E Weiss Journal: Ann Oncol Date: 2017-10-01 Impact factor: 32.976
Authors: David Roberge; Paul D Brown; Anthony Whitton; Chris O'Callaghan; Anne Leis; Jeffrey Greenspoon; Grace Li Smith; Jennifer J Hu; Alan Nichol; Chad Winch; Michael D Chan Journal: Front Oncol Date: 2018-09-13 Impact factor: 6.244
Authors: Matthew N Mills; Thrisha K Potluri; Yuki Kawahara; Matthew Fahey; Nicholas B Figura; Aixa E Soyano; Iman R Washington; Roberto Diaz; Daniel E Oliver; Hsiang-Hsuan Michael Yu; Arnold B Etame; Michael A Vogelbaum; Brian J Czerniecki; John A Arrington; Solmaz Sahebjam; Peter A Forsyth; Hatem H Soliman; Hyo S Han; Kamran A Ahmed Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2021-10-20 Impact factor: 4.872
Authors: Eva Elisabeth van Grinsven; Steven H J Nagtegaal; Joost J C Verhoeff; Martine J E van Zandvoort Journal: Oncol Res Treat Date: 2021-09-03 Impact factor: 2.825
Authors: Rimas V Lukas; Jigisha P Thakkar; Massimo Cristofanilli; Sunandana Chandra; Jeffrey A Sosman; Jyoti D Patel; Priya Kumthekar; Roger Stupp; Maciej S Lesniak Journal: J Neurooncol Date: 2022-01-20 Impact factor: 4.130
Authors: Yizhuo Kelly Gao; Markus Kuksis; Badr Id Said; Rania Chehade; Alex Kiss; William Tran; Faisal Sickandar; Arjun Sahgal; Ellen Warner; Hany Soliman; Katarzyna J Jerzak Journal: Oncologist Date: 2021-09-21