PURPOSE: Brain metastases are a common sequelae of breast cancer. Survival varies widely based on diagnosis-specific prognostic factors (PF). We previously published a prognostic index (Graded Prognostic Assessment [GPA]) for patients with breast cancer with brain metastases (BCBM), based on cohort A (1985-2007, n = 642), then updated it, reporting the effect of tumor subtype in cohort B (1993-2010, n = 400). The purpose of this study is to update the Breast GPA with a larger contemporary cohort (C) and compare treatment and survival across the 3 cohorts. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A multi-institutional (19), multinational (3), retrospective database of 2473 patients with breast cancer with newly diagnosed brain metastases (BCBM) diagnosed from January 1, 2006, to December 31, 2017, was created and compared with prior cohorts. Associations of PF and treatment with survival were analyzed. Kaplan-Meier survival estimates were compared with log-rank tests. PF were weighted and the Breast GPA was updated such that a GPA of 0 and 4.0 correlate with the worst and best prognoses, respectively. RESULTS: Median survival (MS) for cohorts A, B, and C improved over time (from 11, to 14 to 16 months, respectively; P < .01), despite the subtype distribution becoming less favorable. PF significant for survival were tumor subtype, Karnofsky Performance Status, age, number of BCBMs, and extracranial metastases (all P < .01). MS for GPA 0 to 1.0, 1.5-2.0, 2.5-3.0, and 3.5-4.0 was 6, 13, 24, and 36 months, respectively. Between cohorts B and C, the proportion of human epidermal receptor 2 + subtype decreased from 31% to 18% (P < .01) and MS in this subtype increased from 18 to 25 months (P < .01). CONCLUSIONS: MS has improved modestly but varies widely by diagnosis-specific PF. New PF are identified and incorporated into an updated Breast GPA (free online calculator available at brainmetgpa.com). The Breast GPA facilitates clinical decision-making and will be useful for stratification of future clinical trials. Furthermore, these data suggest human epidermal receptor 2-targeted therapies improve clinical outcomes in some patients with BCBM.
PURPOSE:Brain metastases are a common sequelae of breast cancer. Survival varies widely based on diagnosis-specific prognostic factors (PF). We previously published a prognostic index (Graded Prognostic Assessment [GPA]) for patients with breast cancer with brain metastases (BCBM), based on cohort A (1985-2007, n = 642), then updated it, reporting the effect of tumor subtype in cohort B (1993-2010, n = 400). The purpose of this study is to update the Breast GPA with a larger contemporary cohort (C) and compare treatment and survival across the 3 cohorts. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A multi-institutional (19), multinational (3), retrospective database of 2473 patients with breast cancer with newly diagnosed brain metastases (BCBM) diagnosed from January 1, 2006, to December 31, 2017, was created and compared with prior cohorts. Associations of PF and treatment with survival were analyzed. Kaplan-Meier survival estimates were compared with log-rank tests. PF were weighted and the Breast GPA was updated such that a GPA of 0 and 4.0 correlate with the worst and best prognoses, respectively. RESULTS: Median survival (MS) for cohorts A, B, and C improved over time (from 11, to 14 to 16 months, respectively; P < .01), despite the subtype distribution becoming less favorable. PF significant for survival were tumor subtype, Karnofsky Performance Status, age, number of BCBMs, and extracranial metastases (all P < .01). MS for GPA 0 to 1.0, 1.5-2.0, 2.5-3.0, and 3.5-4.0 was 6, 13, 24, and 36 months, respectively. Between cohorts B and C, the proportion of human epidermal receptor 2 + subtype decreased from 31% to 18% (P < .01) and MS in this subtype increased from 18 to 25 months (P < .01). CONCLUSIONS: MS has improved modestly but varies widely by diagnosis-specific PF. New PF are identified and incorporated into an updated Breast GPA (free online calculator available at brainmetgpa.com). The Breast GPA facilitates clinical decision-making and will be useful for stratification of future clinical trials. Furthermore, these data suggest human epidermal receptor 2-targeted therapies improve clinical outcomes in some patients with BCBM.
Authors: R A Patchell; P A Tibbs; J W Walsh; R J Dempsey; Y Maruyama; R J Kryscio; W R Markesbery; J S Macdonald; B Young Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 1990-02-22 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Paul W Sperduto; Brian J Deegan; Jing Li; Krishan R Jethwa; Paul D Brown; Natalie Lockney; Kathryn Beal; Nitesh G Rana; Albert Attia; Chia-Lin Tseng; Arjun Sahgal; Ryan Shanley; William A Sperduto; Emil Lou; Amir Zahra; John M Buatti; James B Yu; Veronica Chiang; Jason K Molitoris; Laura Masucci; David Roberge; Diana D Shi; Helen A Shih; Adam Olson; John P Kirkpatrick; Steve Braunstein; Penny Sneed; Minesh P Mehta Journal: Neuro Oncol Date: 2018-11-12 Impact factor: 12.300
Authors: Lucas Gilbride; Malika Siker; Joseph Bovi; Elizabeth Gore; Christopher Schultz; William A Hall Journal: Neurosurgery Date: 2018-05-01 Impact factor: 4.654
Authors: Paul D Brown; Kurt Jaeckle; Karla V Ballman; Elana Farace; Jane H Cerhan; S Keith Anderson; Xiomara W Carrero; Fred G Barker; Richard Deming; Stuart H Burri; Cynthia Ménard; Caroline Chung; Volker W Stieber; Bruce E Pollock; Evanthia Galanis; Jan C Buckner; Anthony L Asher Journal: JAMA Date: 2016-07-26 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: David W Andrews; Charles B Scott; Paul W Sperduto; Adam E Flanders; Laurie E Gaspar; Michael C Schell; Maria Werner-Wasik; William Demas; Janice Ryu; Jean-Paul Bahary; Luis Souhami; Marvin Rotman; Minesh P Mehta; Walter J Curran Journal: Lancet Date: 2004-05-22 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Eric L Chang; Jeffrey S Wefel; Kenneth R Hess; Pamela K Allen; Frederick F Lang; David G Kornguth; Rebecca B Arbuckle; J Michael Swint; Almon S Shiu; Moshe H Maor; Christina A Meyers Journal: Lancet Oncol Date: 2009-10-02 Impact factor: 41.316
Authors: Rachel A Freedman; Rebecca S Gelman; Carey K Anders; Michelle E Melisko; Heather A Parsons; Anne M Cropp; Kelly Silvestri; Christine M Cotter; Kathryn P Componeschi; Juan M Marte; Roisin M Connolly; Beverly Moy; Catherine H Van Poznak; Kimberly L Blackwell; Shannon L Puhalla; Rachel C Jankowitz; Karen L Smith; Nuhad Ibrahim; Timothy J Moynihan; Ciara C O'Sullivan; Julie Nangia; Polly Niravath; Nadine Tung; Paula R Pohlmann; Robyn Burns; Mothaffar F Rimawi; Ian E Krop; Antonio C Wolff; Eric P Winer; Nancy U Lin Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2019-03-12 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Paul W Sperduto; Shane Mesko; Jing Li; Daniel Cagney; Ayal Aizer; Nancy U Lin; Eric Nesbit; Tim J Kruser; Jason Chan; Steve Braunstein; Jessica Lee; John P Kirkpatrick; Will Breen; Paul D Brown; Diana Shi; Helen A Shih; Hany Soliman; Arjun Sahgal; Ryan Shanley; William Sperduto; Emil Lou; Ashlyn Everett; Drexell Hunter Boggs; Laura Masucci; David Roberge; Jill Remick; Kristin Plichta; John M Buatti; Supriya Jain; Laurie E Gaspar; Cheng-Chia Wu; Tony J C Wang; John Bryant; Michael Chuong; James Yu; Veronica Chiang; Toshimichi Nakano; Hidefumi Aoyama; Minesh P Mehta Journal: Neuro Oncol Date: 2020-09-29 Impact factor: 12.300
Authors: Ninke E A Wellerdieck; Peter Wessels; Maartje Los; Gabe S Sonke; Ellen Tromp; Dieta Brandsma Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2022-06-09 Impact factor: 4.872
Authors: Matthew N Mills; Thrisha K Potluri; Yuki Kawahara; Matthew Fahey; Nicholas B Figura; Aixa E Soyano; Iman R Washington; Roberto Diaz; Daniel E Oliver; Hsiang-Hsuan Michael Yu; Arnold B Etame; Michael A Vogelbaum; Brian J Czerniecki; John A Arrington; Solmaz Sahebjam; Peter A Forsyth; Hatem H Soliman; Hyo S Han; Kamran A Ahmed Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2021-10-20 Impact factor: 4.872
Authors: Paul W Sperduto; Shane Mesko; Jing Li; Daniel Cagney; Ayal Aizer; Nancy U Lin; Eric Nesbit; Tim J Kruser; Jason Chan; Steve Braunstein; Jessica Lee; John P Kirkpatrick; Will Breen; Paul D Brown; Diana Shi; Helen A Shih; Hany Soliman; Arjun Sahgal; Ryan Shanley; William A Sperduto; Emil Lou; Ashlyn Everett; Drexell H Boggs; Laura Masucci; David Roberge; Jill Remick; Kristin Plichta; John M Buatti; Supriya Jain; Laurie E Gaspar; Cheng-Chia Wu; Tony J C Wang; John Bryant; Michael Chuong; Yi An; Veronica Chiang; Toshimichi Nakano; Hidefumi Aoyama; Minesh P Mehta Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2020-09-15 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Matthew N Mills; Chetna Thawani; Nicholas B Figura; Daniel E Oliver; Aixa E Soyano; Arnold Etame; Timothy J Robinson; James K Liu; Michael A Vogelbaum; Peter A Forsyth; Brian J Czerniecki; Hatem H Soliman; Hyo S Han; Hsiang-Hsuan Michael Yu; Kamran A Ahmed Journal: J Neurooncol Date: 2021-03-19 Impact factor: 4.130
Authors: C Fabregat-Franco; A Stradella; V Navarro; J Linares; M Galdeano; S Recalde; R Velasco; M Simo; A Fernadez; A C Venthecourt; C Falo; S Vazquez; M Bergamino; R Villanueva; S Pernas; M J Gil-Gil Journal: Clin Transl Oncol Date: 2021-03-11 Impact factor: 3.405
Authors: Waqar Haque; Vivek Verma; Sebastian Adeberg; Robert Rustomily; Simon Lo; E Brian Butler; Bin S Teh Journal: Rep Pract Oncol Radiother Date: 2021-06-09