Literature DB >> 32930805

[Personality traits in anesthesiology : Results from a questionnaire-based requirements analysis].

S G Gassner1,2, V Oubaid3, W Hampe4, J C Kubitz5,6.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Criteria for the identification of suitable applicants for undergraduate and postgraduate medical education are greatly and ubiquitously discussed. Apart from the acquisition of theoretical knowledge and practical skills, certain personality traits are necessary for practicing the medical profession; however, little is known on the personality traits required for medical subspecialties. This study had two objectives: 1) identification and evaluation of personality traits which are essential for performing anesthesiology and 2) establishment of a job specification for anesthesiology.
METHODS: We performed a survey among German anesthesiologists using an online questionnaire. This questionnaire collected demographic data, such as age, gender, level of postgraduate education and 28 personality traits from 5 categories: cognition, psychomotor, physical, sensory and social interactive properties. The participants were asked to rate the personality traits on a 5-point Likert scale. Statistical analysis was performed using an ANOVA.
RESULTS: A total of 714 questionnaires were analyzed. Social interactive skills and cognitive personality traits were considered as most important for a clinical career in anesthesiology. The three personality traits rated highest were a high decision-making ability, stress tolerance and speed of perception. Furthermore, a high apprehension, affability and patient-oriented behavior are needed.
CONCLUSION: A job specification describing important personality traits can be useful to advise both undergraduates and postgraduates on their medical career and for medical team simulation tasks. For the clinical practice in anesthesiology, for example, high social interactive and cognitive personality traits are required.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Candidate selection; Personality inventory; Personality traits; Qualification; Requirement profiles

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32930805     DOI: 10.1007/s00101-020-00845-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anaesthesist        ISSN: 0003-2417            Impact factor:   1.041


  8 in total

Review 1.  Anaesthetists' non-technical skills.

Authors:  R Flin; R Patey; R Glavin; N Maran
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2010-06-03       Impact factor: 9.166

2.  [Analysis of the personnel development in anesthesiology over the last two decades with special attention to gender aspects].

Authors:  H van den Bussche; M Scherer; C Zöllner; J C Kubitz
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2019-04-12       Impact factor: 1.041

3.  Non-technical skills of surgeons and anaesthetists in simulated operating theatre crises.

Authors:  A G Doumouras; M Hamidi; K Lung; C L Tarola; M W Tsao; J W Scott; D S Smink; S Yule
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2017-04-04       Impact factor: 6.939

4.  [Assessment of physicians? : Results of a sample analysis for the selection of physicians for staff positions].

Authors:  P Anheuser; J Kranz; K P Dieckmann; J Steffens; V Oubaid
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 5.  Non-technical skills training in the operating theatre: A meta-analysis of patient outcomes.

Authors:  Sebastian Leuschner; Maria Leuschner; Siegfried Kropf; Andreas D Niederbichler
Journal:  Surgeon       Date:  2018-08-07       Impact factor: 2.392

6.  [Human resource management. How do we find the right surgeons?].

Authors:  V Oubaid; J Jähne
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 0.955

Review 7.  [Selection of medical students : Measurement of cognitive abilities and psychosocial competencies].

Authors:  Anja Schwibbe; Janina Lackamp; Mirjana Knorr; Johanna Hissbach; Martina Kadmon; Wolfgang Hampe
Journal:  Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 1.513

8.  What non-technical skills competencies are addressed by Australian standards documents for health professionals who work in secondary and tertiary clinical settings? A qualitative comparative analysis.

Authors:  Monica Peddle; Margaret Bearman; Natalie Radomski; Lisa Mckenna; Debra Nestel
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-08-05       Impact factor: 2.692

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.