Literature DB >> 29294180

[Selection of medical students : Measurement of cognitive abilities and psychosocial competencies].

Anja Schwibbe1, Janina Lackamp2, Mirjana Knorr2, Johanna Hissbach2, Martina Kadmon3, Wolfgang Hampe2.   

Abstract

The German Constitutional Court is currently reviewing whether the actual study admission process in medicine is compatible with the constitutional right of freedom of profession, since applicants without an excellent GPA usually have to wait for seven years. If the admission system is changed, politicians would like to increase the influence of psychosocial criteria on selection as specified by the Masterplan Medizinstudium 2020.What experiences have been made with the actual selection procedures? How could Situational Judgement Tests contribute to the validity of future selection procedures to German medical schools?High school GPA is the best predictor of study performance, but is more and more under discussion due to the lack of comparability between states and schools and the growing number of applicants with top grades. Aptitude and knowledge tests, especially in the natural sciences, show incremental validity in predicting study performance. The measurement of psychosocial competencies with traditional interviews shows rather low reliability and validity. The more reliable multiple mini-interviews are superior in predicting practical study performance. Situational judgement tests (SJTs) used abroad are regarded as reliable and valid; the correlation of a German SJT piloted in Hamburg with the multiple mini-interview is cautiously encouraging.A model proposed by the Medizinischer Fakultätentag and the Bundesvertretung der Medizinstudierenden considers these results. Student selection is proposed to be based on a combination of high school GPA (40%) and a cognitive test (40%) as well as an SJT (10%) and job experience (10%). Furthermore, the faculties still have the option to carry out specific selection procedures.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cognitive and psychosocial selection criteria; Masterplan Medizinstudium 2020; Medicine; Situational judgement test; Student selection

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29294180     DOI: 10.1007/s00103-017-2670-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz        ISSN: 1436-9990            Impact factor:   1.513


  8 in total

1.  Exam performance of different admission quotas in the first part of the state examination in medicine: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Alex Mommert; Josefin Wagner; Jana Jünger; Jürgen Westermann
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2020-05-25       Impact factor: 2.463

2.  Who is allowed to study medicine? - regulations and evidence.

Authors:  Wolfgang Hampe; Martina Kadmon
Journal:  GMS J Med Educ       Date:  2019-02-15

3.  The Hamburg integrated medical degree program iMED.

Authors:  Anke Rheingans; Athanasios Soulos; Sonja Mohr; Jelka Meyer; Andreas H Guse
Journal:  GMS J Med Educ       Date:  2019-10-15

4.  Selection procedure human medicine and psychology at the University of Witten/Herdecke: adaptation to the virtual zoom room.

Authors:  Michaela Zupanic; Judith Schulze-Rohr; Julia Nitsche; Thomas Ostermann; Marzellus Hofmann; Jan P Ehlers
Journal:  GMS J Med Educ       Date:  2020-12-03

Review 5.  Association of professional pre-qualifications, study success in medical school and the eligibility for becoming a physician: A scoping review.

Authors:  Rebecca Erschens; Anne Herrmann-Werner; Tim Fabian Schaffland; Augustin Kelava; David Ambiel; Stephan Zipfel; Teresa Loda
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-11-11       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Assessing distinguishable social skills in medical admission: does construct-driven development solve validity issues of situational judgment tests?

Authors:  Ina Mielke; Simon M Breil; Dorothee Amelung; Lia Espe; Mirjana Knorr
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2022-04-20       Impact factor: 3.263

7.  [Personality traits in anesthesiology : Results from a questionnaire-based requirements analysis].

Authors:  S G Gassner; V Oubaid; W Hampe; J C Kubitz
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2020-09-15       Impact factor: 1.041

8.  From HAM-Nat to the "Physikum" - Analysis of the study success parameters before and after the introduction of a science test in the approval procedure.

Authors:  Katrin Werwick; Kirstin Winkler-Stuck; Bernt-Peter Robra
Journal:  GMS J Med Educ       Date:  2018-08-15
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.