Literature DB >> 32930705

Changes in the Association Between Diagnostic Testing Method, Polymerase Chain Reaction Ribotype, and Clinical Outcomes From Clostridioides difficile Infection: One Institution's Experience.

Anitha Menon1,2, D Alex Perry1,2, Jonathan Motyka1,2, Shayna Weiner1,2, Alexandra Standke1,2, Aline Penkevich1,2, Micah Keidan1,2, Vincent B Young1,2,3, Krishna Rao1,2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI), the relationship between clinical, microbial, and temporal/epidemiological trends, disease severity and adverse outcomes is incompletely understood. In a follow-up to our study from 2010-2013, we evaluate stool toxin levels and C. difficile polymerase chain reaction (PCR) ribotypes. We hypothesized that elevated stool toxins and infection with ribotype 027 associate with adverse outcomes.
METHODS: In 565 subjects at the University of Michigan with CDI diagnosed by positive testing for toxins A/B by enzyme immunoassay (EIA) or PCR for the tcdB gene, we quantified stool toxin levels via a modified cell cytotoxicity assay (CCA), isolated C. difficile by anaerobic culture, and performed PCR ribotyping. Severe CDI was defined by Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) criteria, and primary outcomes were all-cause 30-day mortality and a composite of colectomy, intensive care unit admission, and/or death attributable to CDI within 30 days. Analyses included bivariable tests and logistic regression.
RESULTS: 199 samples were diagnosed by EIA; 447 were diagnosed by PCR. Toxin positivity associated with IDSA severity but not primary outcomes. In 2016, compared with 2010-2013, ribotype 106 newly emerged, accounting for 10.6% of strains, ribotype 027 fell from 16.5% to 9.3%, and ribotype 014-027 remained stable at 18.9%. Ribotype 014-020 associated with IDSA severity and 30-day mortality (P = .001).
CONCLUSIONS: Toxin positivity by EIA and CCA associated with IDSA severity but not with subsequent adverse outcomes. The molecular epidemiology of C. difficile has shifted, which may have implications for the optimal diagnostic strategy for and clinical severity of CDI.
© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press for the Infectious Diseases Society of America. All rights reserved. For permissions, e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  zzm321990 C difficilezzm321990 ; diagnostic testing methods; infection prevention; molecular epidemiology; toxins

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 32930705      PMCID: PMC8563190          DOI: 10.1093/cid/ciaa1395

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Infect Dis        ISSN: 1058-4838            Impact factor:   9.079


  30 in total

Review 1.  Clinical approach to severe Clostridium difficile infection: update for the hospital practitioner.

Authors:  Chaitanya Pant; Thomas J Sferra; Abhishek Deshpande; Anil Minocha
Journal:  Eur J Intern Med       Date:  2011-05-31       Impact factor: 4.487

2.  Clinical and infection control implications of Clostridium difficile infection with negative enzyme immunoassay for toxin.

Authors:  Dubert M Guerrero; Christina Chou; Lucy A Jury; Michelle M Nerandzic; Jennifer C Cadnum; Curtis J Donskey
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2011-08-01       Impact factor: 9.079

3.  Clostridium difficile ribotype 027: relationship to age, detectability of toxins A or B in stool with rapid testing, severe infection, and mortality.

Authors:  Krishna Rao; Dejan Micic; Mukil Natarajan; Spencer Winters; Mark J Kiel; Seth T Walk; Kavitha Santhosh; Jill A Mogle; Andrzej T Galecki; William LeBar; Peter D R Higgins; Vincent B Young; David M Aronoff
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2015-03-31       Impact factor: 9.079

4.  Evaluation of portability and cost of a fluorescent PCR ribotyping protocol for Clostridium difficile epidemiology.

Authors:  Jonathan N V Martinson; Susan Broadaway; Egan Lohman; Christina Johnson; M Jahangir Alam; Mohammed Khaleduzzaman; Kevin W Garey; Jessica Schlackman; Vincent B Young; Kavitha Santhosh; Krishna Rao; Robert H Lyons; Seth T Walk
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2015-01-28       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Risk of Subsequent Sepsis Within 90 Days After a Hospital Stay by Type of Antibiotic Exposure.

Authors:  James Baggs; John A Jernigan; Alison Laufer Halpin; Lauren Epstein; Kelly M Hatfield; L Clifford McDonald
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2018-03-19       Impact factor: 9.079

Review 6.  Diagnosis and treatment of Clostridium difficile in adults: a systematic review.

Authors:  Natasha Bagdasarian; Krishna Rao; Preeti N Malani
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2015-01-27       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  Laboratory and Clinical features of EIA Toxin-positive and EIA Toxin-negative Community-acquired Clostridium difficile Infection.

Authors:  Hiren Patel; Jeewanjot Randhawa; Sushant Nanavati; L Randy Marton; Walid J Baddoura; Vincent A DeBari
Journal:  Ann Clin Lab Sci       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 1.256

8.  Clinical characteristics and outcome of patients with Clostridium difficile infection diagnosed by PCR versus a three-step algorithm.

Authors:  C Beaulieu; L-L Dionne; A-S Julien; Y Longtin
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Infect       Date:  2014-07-12       Impact factor: 8.067

9.  Overdiagnosis of Clostridium difficile Infection in the Molecular Test Era.

Authors:  Christopher R Polage; Clare E Gyorke; Michael A Kennedy; Jhansi L Leslie; David L Chin; Susan Wang; Hien H Nguyen; Bin Huang; Yi-Wei Tang; Lenora W Lee; Kyoungmi Kim; Sandra Taylor; Patrick S Romano; Edward A Panacek; Parker B Goodell; Jay V Solnick; Stuart H Cohen
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 21.873

10.  Mechanisms of hypervirulent Clostridium difficile ribotype 027 displacement of endemic strains: an epidemiological model.

Authors:  Laith Yakob; Thomas V Riley; David L Paterson; John Marquess; Ricardo J Soares Magalhaes; Luis Furuya-Kanamori; Archie C A Clements
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-07-28       Impact factor: 4.379

View more
  2 in total

1.  Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs are not associated with increased risk of Clostridioides difficile infection: A propensity-score-matched case-control study.

Authors:  Adam M Ressler; Alieysa Patel; Krishna Rao
Journal:  Anaerobe       Date:  2021-09-22       Impact factor: 3.331

2.  Antigen testing and non-infectious shedding of SARS-COV-2.

Authors:  Yehuda Raveh; Jacques Simkins; Ramona Nicolau-Raducu
Journal:  Infection       Date:  2021-02-10       Impact factor: 3.553

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.