Background: We examined the risk of sepsis within 90 days after discharge from a previous hospital stay by type of antibiotic received during the previous stay. Methods: We retrospectively identified a cohort of hospitalized patients from the Truven Health MarketScan Hospital Drug Database. We examined the association between the use of certain antibiotics during the initial hospital stay, determined a priori, and the risk of postdischarge sepsis controlling for potential confounding factors in a multivariable logistic regression model. Our primary exposure was receipt of antibiotics more strongly associated with clinically important microbiome disruption. Our primary outcome was a hospital stay within 90 days of the index stay that included an International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) discharge diagnosis of severe sepsis (ICD-9-CM code 995.92) or septic shock (785.52). Results: Among 516 hospitals, we randomly selected a single stay for eligible patients. In 0.17% of these patients, severe sepsis/septic shock developed within 90 days after discharge. The risk of sepsis associated with exposure to our high-risk antibiotics was 65% higher than in those without antibiotic exposure. Conclusions: Our study identified an increased risk of sepsis within 90 days of discharge among patients with exposure to high-risk antibiotics or increased quantities of antibiotics during hospitalization. Given that a significant proportion of inpatient antimicrobial use may be unnecessary, this study builds on previous evidence suggesting that increased stewardship efforts in hospitals may not only prevent antimicrobial resistance, Clostridium difficile infection, and other adverse effects, but may also reduce unwanted outcomes potentially related to disruption of the microbiota, including sepsis.
Background: We examined the risk of sepsis within 90 days after discharge from a previous hospital stay by type of antibiotic received during the previous stay. Methods: We retrospectively identified a cohort of hospitalized patients from the Truven Health MarketScan Hospital Drug Database. We examined the association between the use of certain antibiotics during the initial hospital stay, determined a priori, and the risk of postdischarge sepsis controlling for potential confounding factors in a multivariable logistic regression model. Our primary exposure was receipt of antibiotics more strongly associated with clinically important microbiome disruption. Our primary outcome was a hospital stay within 90 days of the index stay that included an International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) discharge diagnosis of severe sepsis (ICD-9-CM code 995.92) or septic shock (785.52). Results: Among 516 hospitals, we randomly selected a single stay for eligible patients. In 0.17% of these patients, severe sepsis/septic shock developed within 90 days after discharge. The risk of sepsis associated with exposure to our high-risk antibiotics was 65% higher than in those without antibiotic exposure. Conclusions: Our study identified an increased risk of sepsis within 90 days of discharge among patients with exposure to high-risk antibiotics or increased quantities of antibiotics during hospitalization. Given that a significant proportion of inpatient antimicrobial use may be unnecessary, this study builds on previous evidence suggesting that increased stewardship efforts in hospitals may not only prevent antimicrobial resistance, Clostridium difficile infection, and other adverse effects, but may also reduce unwanted outcomes potentially related to disruption of the microbiota, including sepsis.
Authors: Timothy H Dellit; Robert C Owens; John E McGowan; Dale N Gerding; Robert A Weinstein; John P Burke; W Charles Huskins; David L Paterson; Neil O Fishman; Christopher F Carpenter; P J Brennan; Marianne Billeter; Thomas M Hooton Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2006-12-13 Impact factor: 9.079
Authors: Brittany B Lewis; Charlie G Buffie; Rebecca A Carter; Ingrid Leiner; Nora C Toussaint; Liza C Miller; Asia Gobourne; Lilan Ling; Eric G Pamer Journal: J Infect Dis Date: 2015-04-28 Impact factor: 5.226
Authors: V Marco Ranieri; B Taylor Thompson; Philip S Barie; Jean-François Dhainaut; Ivor S Douglas; Simon Finfer; Bengt Gårdlund; John C Marshall; Andrew Rhodes; Antonio Artigas; Didier Payen; Jyrki Tenhunen; Hussein R Al-Khalidi; Vivian Thompson; Jonathan Janes; William L Macias; Burkhard Vangerow; Mark D Williams Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2012-05-22 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: R Phillip Dellinger; Mitchell M Levy; Andrew Rhodes; Djillali Annane; Herwig Gerlach; Steven M Opal; Jonathan E Sevransky; Charles L Sprung; Ivor S Douglas; Roman Jaeschke; Tiffany M Osborn; Mark E Nunnally; Sean R Townsend; Konrad Reinhart; Ruth M Kleinpell; Derek C Angus; Clifford S Deutschman; Flavia R Machado; Gordon D Rubenfeld; Steven A Webb; Richard J Beale; Jean-Louis Vincent; Rui Moreno Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 2013-02 Impact factor: 7.598
Authors: James Baggs; Scott K Fridkin; Lori A Pollack; Arjun Srinivasan; John A Jernigan Journal: JAMA Intern Med Date: 2016-11-01 Impact factor: 21.873
Authors: Yascha Khodamoradi; Johanna Kessel; Jörg Janne Vehreschild; Maria J G T Vehreschild Journal: Dtsch Arztebl Int Date: 2019-10-04 Impact factor: 5.594
Authors: Alice Y Guh; Kelly M Hatfield; Lisa G Winston; Brittany Martin; Helen Johnston; Geoffrey Brousseau; Monica M Farley; Lucy Wilson; Rebecca Perlmutter; Erin C Phipps; Ghinwa K Dumyati; Deborah Nelson; Trupti Hatwar; Marion A Kainer; Ashley L Paulick; Maria Karlsson; Dale N Gerding; L Clifford McDonald Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2019-10-30 Impact factor: 9.079
Authors: Teppei Shimasaki; Anna Seekatz; Christine Bassis; Yoona Rhee; Rachel D Yelin; Louis Fogg; Thelma Dangana; Enrique Cornejo Cisneros; Robert A Weinstein; Koh Okamoto; Karen Lolans; Michael Schoeny; Michael Y Lin; Nicholas M Moore; Vincent B Young; Mary K Hayden Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2019-05-30 Impact factor: 9.079