| Literature DB >> 19542209 |
Antoinette Moran1, Jordan Dunitz, Brandon Nathan, Asad Saeed, Bonnie Holme, William Thomas.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Cystic fibrosis (CF)-related diabetes (CFRD) diagnosis and management have considerably changed since diabetes was first shown to be associated with a poor prognosis in subjects with CF. Current trends in CFRD prevalence, incidence, and mortality were determined from a comprehensive clinical database. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Data were reviewed from 872 CF patients followed at the University of Minnesota during three consecutive intervals: 1992-1997, 1998-2002, and 2003-2008.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2009 PMID: 19542209 PMCID: PMC2732133 DOI: 10.2337/dc09-0586
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Diabetes Care ISSN: 0149-5992 Impact factor: 19.112
Mortality rates and CFRD prevalence and incidence for consecutive time intervals
| 1992−1997 | 1998−2002 | 2003−2008 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Patients seen in a clinic during the interval | 752 | 702 | 647 |
| Female subjects (%) | 53 | 53 | 53 |
| CFRD prevalence at the end of the interval (%) | 20 ± 2 | 30 ± 2 | 33 ± 2 |
| CFRD incidence per 100 person-years | 3.0 ± 0.3 | 4.0 ± 0.4 | 2.7 ± 0.3 |
| CFRD mortality rate per 100 person-years | 6.7 ± 1.3 | 5.4 ± 0.9 | 3.5 ± 0.6 |
| Patients diagnosed with CFRD during the interval/those who were diagnosed and died within the same interval | 108/18 | 102/12 | 61/2 |
| Total CF population mortality rate per 100 person-years | 1.2 ± 0.2 | 1.6 ± 0.2 | 1.8 ± 0.2 |
| Non-CFRD mortality rate per 100 person-years | 0.5 ± 0.1 | 0.6 ± 0.2 | 1.0 ± 0.2 |
Data are means ± SE unless otherwise indicated. a, b Comparisons are between time intervals within each row. Rates that do not share a letter are significantly different (P < 0.05); rates that share a letter are not significantly different. Rows with no letters have no significant differences. During each interval, for all rates there were no significant differences between male and female subjects.
Figure 1Current prevalence of CFRD in the 527 patients actively followed at the University of Minnesota, 15 September 2008. A: CFRD total (■), CFRD with fasting hyperglycemia (▨), and CFRD without fasting hyperglycemia (□) by decade of age. B: CFRD total men (■) versus women (□) by decade of age. The number of total subjects (with and without diabetes) in each age-group is noted. *P = 0.02, men vs. women.
Figure 2The University of Minnesota CFRD incidence per 100 patient-years by sex and age decade 2003–2008. Sample sizes for the incidence rates are shown below the figure.
Figure 3The University of Minnesota CFRD and CF mortality per 100 patient-years by sex and age decade over three time periods: 2003–2008, 1998–2002, and 1992–1997. CF patients with diabetes (DM) are shown with solid lines, while CF patients without diabetes are shown with dashed lines. Zero rates estimated from <10 patients are not shown. The gap in mortality between those with and those without diabetes has diminished over these time periods, and the sex difference in mortality has disappeared in the most current analysis.
Characteristics of the 2008 adult CF population, aged ≥18 years, followed at the University of Minnesota (n = 359)
| Total population | Male subjects | Female subjects | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CFRD | No CFRD | Without fasting hyperglycemia | With fasting hyperglycemia | No CFRD | Without fasting hyperglycemia | With fasting hyperglycemia | No CFRD | |
| 155 | 204 | 35 | 43 | 110 | 43 | 34 | 94 | |
| Age (years) | 33 ± 10 | 32 ± 10 | 32 ± 10 | 35 ± 10 | 33 ± 9 | 32 ± 8 | 35 ± 11 | 31 ± 11 |
| Duration of diabetes (years) | 10 ± 5 | — | 9 ± 5 | 9 ± 5 | — | 8 | 13 | — |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 22.6 ± 4 | 23.3 ± 4 | 21.8 ± 4 | 23.7 | 24.0 | 22.2 ± 3 | 22.5 | 22.6 |
| Percent predicted FEV1 | 65 | 71 | 60 | 61 | 72 | 67 ± 23 | 71 ± 29 | 69 ± 24 |
Data are means ± SD unless otherwise indicated. Data are not shown for 167 children and adolescents in whom there were no significant differences in pulmonary function or BMI between those with and those without diabetes. (See text for details.)
*Significant difference (P < 0.05) in duration of diabetes between female subjects with and without fasting hyperglycemia.
†Significant differences (P < 0.05) between male and female subjects within a diagnostic subgroup (with fasting hyperglycemia, without fasting hyperglycemia, or with no CFRD).
‡Significant differences (P < 0.05) between CFRD and no CFRD.