| Literature DB >> 32928138 |
Nidal Muhanna1,2,3,4, Harley H L Chan2, Catriona M Douglas5,6,7, Michael J Daly2, Atul Jaidka2, Donovan Eu1,2, Jonathan Bernstein1,2,3, Jason L Townson2, Jonathan C Irish1,2,3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Current sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) techniques, including use of radioisotopes, have disadvantages including the use of a radioactive tracer. Indocyanine green (ICG) based near-infrared (NIR) fluorescence imaging and cone beam CT (CBCT) have advantages for intraoperative use. However, limited literature exists regarding their use in head and neck cancer SLNB.Entities:
Keywords: Cone beam CT; Head and neck cancer; Head and neck surgery; Indocyanine green; Near-infrared fluorescence imaging; Sentinel lymph node biopsy
Year: 2020 PMID: 32928138 PMCID: PMC7491106 DOI: 10.1186/s12880-020-00507-x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Med Imaging ISSN: 1471-2342 Impact factor: 1.930
Fig. 1a Work flow b buccal cancer; c microCT demonstrating the tumor and lymph node; d surface rendering from microCT. e NIR fluorescence view of lymph node
Fig. 2Surgical guidance using intraoperative NIR fluoresence imaging in head and neck surgery with VX2 carcinoma bearing New Zealand White rabbit in buccal area: a subcutaneous ICG injection. b Intraoperative NIR fluorescence imaging. c White light image - lymph node. d NIR fluorescence image - lymph node. e Fluorescence green pseudo-color image overlay on white light image
Fig. 3CT [(a)-(c)] and fluorescence [(d)-(f)] images of 3 rabbit lymph nodes
Identification of sentinel lymph nodes (SLN) in pre-operative micro CT imaging, intraoperative cone-beam CT (CBCT) imaging, intraoperative fluorescence imaging and final histopathology pathology. Lymph nodes were identified in the submandibularis region, see Fig. 1
| Animal | # SLN Pre-op μCT | #SLN Intraoperative CBCT | # SLN Intraoperative Fluorescence | # SLN Metastasis Histopathology |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rabbit 1 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 1 |
| Rabbit 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 0 |
| Rabbit 3 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 |
| Rabbit 4 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 1 |
| Rabbit 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 |
| Rabbit 6 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 2 |
| Rabbit 7 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 |
| Rabbit 8 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 1 |
| Rabbit 9 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 |
| Rabbit 10 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 |
| Total |
Fig. 4a lymph node location on CBCT; b Surface rendering from CBCT; c lymph node after skin exposure; d lymph node after fascia removed; e fluorescence in lymph vessels; f NIR fluorescence image corresponding to (e)
Fig. 5Comparison of pre-operative microCT (top) and intra-operative CBCT images for SLN imaging. a,b,c Axial, coronal and sagittal view on microCT. d,e,f The same rabbit and same views with cone beam CT
Fig. 6Analysis sequence for lymph node fluorescence imaging in intraoperative surgical guidance resecting the target: a percutaneous NIR fluorescence image; b in situ NIR fluorescence image; c in situ NIR fluorescence image of LN-A in Rabbit 4 with signal-to-background (SBR) ratios, the SBR for region-of-interest 1 and 2 are 6.0 and 4.6, respectively; d ex-vivo NIR fluorescence image of resected lymph node; e Pathology examination of tissue slice stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E); f Pathology examination of tissue slice with pan-cytokeratin straining (AE1/AE3). Note: H&E and AE1/AE3 slice suggest the resected lymph node is positive which correspondent to surgeon’s anatomical inspection