| Literature DB >> 21360250 |
J Sven D Mieog1, Susan L Troyan, Merlijn Hutteman, Kevin J Donohoe, Joost R van der Vorst, Alan Stockdale, Gerrit-Jan Liefers, Hak Soo Choi, Summer L Gibbs-Strauss, Hein Putter, Sylvain Gioux, Peter J K Kuppen, Yoshitomo Ashitate, Clemens W G M Löwik, Vincent T H B M Smit, Rafiou Oketokoun, Long H Ngo, Cornelis J H van de Velde, John V Frangioni, Alexander L Vahrmeijer.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Near-infrared (NIR) fluorescent sentinel lymph node (SLN) mapping in breast cancer requires optimized imaging systems and lymphatic tracers.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2011 PMID: 21360250 PMCID: PMC3139732 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-011-1566-x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ann Surg Oncol ISSN: 1068-9265 Impact factor: 5.344
Fig. 1The Mini-FLARE portable near-infrared fluorescence imaging system. a Imaging system, composed of electronics/monitor cart and counterweighted imaging system pole. b Sterile drape/shield attached to the imaging head with other major parts identified. c Excitation and emission light paths, and filtration for the Mini-FLARE imaging system. DM, 650 nm dichroic mirror
Mini-FLARE imaging system specifications
| Category/specification | Description |
|---|---|
| Physical | |
| Size | Mobile cart: 24 in. W × 24 in. D × 29 in. H; mast height: 76.5 in. |
| Weight | Cart: 272 lb, including all electronics |
| Arm: 95 lb, including, stand, gooseneck, and imaging head | |
| Imaging head: 8.8 lb | |
| Arm and stand | Flexible arm; reach: 27–64 in. from floor, 42 in. from center of stand. Center of stand up to 11 linear ft from cart |
| Electrical | |
| Voltage and plug | 120 V AC, 60 Hz; single NEMA 5–15 120 V/15 A AC plug |
| Current | 5 A max |
| Grounding | Isolation transformer for all components; redundant chassis grounding |
| Leakage current | <300 μA (per AAMI/IEC No. 60601) |
| Sterility | |
| Shield | Disposable acrylic shield with ≥95% transmission |
| Drape | Disposable, custom-fit plastic drape bonded to shield |
| Light source | |
| Housing | Anodized aluminum with integrated liquid cooling |
| Elements | Custom 25-mm circular LED arrays w/integrated linear drivers |
| Electronics | Custom control board with embedded microcontroller |
| Fluence rates | 26,600 lux white light (400–650 nm), 1.08 mW/cm2 of 700 nm (656–678 nm) excitation light, 7.70 mW/cm2 of 800 nm (745–779 nm) excitation light |
| Optics | |
| Working distance | 4–13 in. (10–32 cm) from patient (reverse telephoto) |
| Field-of-view | 12 cm W × 9 cm H at 13 in. working distance |
| Emission/reflectance channels | Color video (400–650 nm), 700 nm fluorescence (689–725 nm), 800 nm fluorescence (800–848 nm), all with simultaneous acquisition |
| Pixel resolution | 640 × 480 for each camera |
| System resolution | 320 × 320 μm ( |
| Display refresh | Up to 15 Hz simultaneous acquisition on both cameras |
| NIR exposure time | Adjustable from 100 μs to 8 s |
| Hands-free | |
| Optics | Automatic focus |
| Control | 6-pedal footswitch |
| Monitors | |
| Number | 3 cart-mounted 20 in.: 2 for operator and 1 for surgeon |
Fig. 2Optimization of ICG:HSA dose as a function of the complex trade-off between fluorescence quenching at the injection site and dilution of fluorophore in lymphatic channels. a Preclinical studies in Yorkshire pigs. Subcutaneous injection sites (left; white arrows) showing quenching and resected SLNs (right) showing NIR fluorophore dilution for increasing concentrations of ICG:HSA. For each are displayed color video (left columns) and 800 nm NIR fluorescence (right columns) images obtained using 760 nm excitation light at 7.7 mW/cm2. All camera exposure times were 45 ms. Data are representative of n = 3 pigs. b Optimization of ICG:HSA dose for breast cancer SLN mapping: Signal-to-background ratio (mean ± SD) of the SLNs (ordinate) as a function of injected dose of ICG:HSA (abscissa) in women undergoing SLN mapping for breast cancer. Statistical comparisons are: 200 vs. 400 μM, P = .001; 200 vs. 500 μM, P = .001; 200 vs. 600 μM, P < .0001; 200 vs. 800 μM, P = .001; 1000 vs. 400 μM, P < .0001; 1000 vs. 500 μM, P < .0001; 1000 vs. 600 μM, P < .0001; 1000 vs. 800 μM, P < .0001. The SBRs of the 400, 500, 600, and 800 μM concentration groups were not significantly different, although a trend was found favoring the 600 μM concentration group (500 vs. 600, P = .06)
Patient and tumor characteristics
| Characteristic |
| % |
|---|---|---|
| Age (median, range) | 59.5 (33–81) | |
| Menopausal state | ||
| Premenopausal | 5 | 21 |
| Postmenopausal | 19 | 79 |
| Body mass index (median, range) | 25 (18–38) | |
| Skin type | ||
| II | 4 | 17 |
| III | 20 | 83 |
| Previous breast surgerya | 3 | 13 |
| Multifocality | 4 | 17 |
| Tumor side | ||
| Left | 14 | 58 |
| Right | 10 | 42 |
| Tumor localization | ||
| Central | 5 | 21 |
| Lower inner | 1 | 4 |
| Lower outer | 1 | 4 |
| Upper inner | 6 | 25 |
| Upper outer | 11 | 46 |
| Type of operation | ||
| Ablation | 9 | 38 |
| Wide local excision | 15 | 63 |
| Pathological tumor size (median, range) | 15 (3–35) | |
| Histological type | ||
| Infiltrating ductal adenocarcinoma | 18 | 75 |
| Infiltrating lobular adenocarcinoma | 2 | 8 |
| Ductal carcinoma In Situ | 4 | 17 |
| Histological grade | ||
| I | 3 | 13 |
| II | 13 | 54 |
| III | 8 | 33 |
| Receptor statusb | ||
| ER + HER2− | 16 | 67 |
| ER + HER2+ | 3 | 13 |
| ER − HER2− | 1 | 4 |
| Missingc | 4 | 17 |
aPrevious breast surgery: silicone breast implantation, breast reduction, and re-excision
bHER2 status was determined using the chromogenic in situ hybridization (CISH) kit of Zymed (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA)
cNot applicable in 4 patients with ductal carcinoma in situ
SLN identification results
| Characteristic |
| % |
|---|---|---|
| Injection site patent blue and ICG:HSA | ||
| Periareolar | 20 | 83 |
| Peritumoral | 4 | 17 |
| SLN detection | ||
| Number of SLNs identified | 35 | |
| Average number of SLNs identified (range) | 1.45 (1–3) | |
| Method of detection | ||
| Radioactive | 35 | 100 |
| Blue | 30 | 86 |
| Near-infrared fluorescence | 35 | 100 |
| Average time between injection of ICG:HSA and skin incision (SD) (minutes) | 16 ± 3 | |
| Average time between skin incision and SLN resection (SD) (minutes) | 17 ± 5 | |
| Histology | ||
| Negative | 26 | 74 |
| Isolated tumor cells | 3 | 9 |
| Micrometastases | 0 | 0 |
| Macrometastases | 6 | 17 |
| Axillary treatment | ||
| None | 16 | 67 |
| Axillary lymph node dissection | 5 | 21 |
| Axillary radiotherapy | 3 | 13 |
| Complications | ||
| No | 21 | 87 |
| Yes | 3a | 13 |
ICG:HSA indocyanine green adsorbed to human serum albumin, SLN sentinel lymph node, SD standard deviation
aTwo patients experienced postoperative wound infection requiring treatment with antibiotics, and one patient underwent surgical re-exploration because of an expanding hematoma following axillary lymph node dissection
Fig. 3Real-time NIR fluorescence imaging during sentinel lymph node mapping in women with breast cancer: Shown are typical in vivo (top row) and ex vivo (bottom row; postresection) results from a subject injected with 500 μM ICG:HSA. White arrow identifies the SLN. NIR fluorescence (left) and pseudocolored (lime green) merge with the color video image (right). Exposure times were 50 ms for in vivo images and 30 ms for ex vivo images. 760 nm excitation fluence rate was ~7.7 mW/cm2 for all images. Scale bars indicate 1 cm