Literature DB >> 29405059

3D Bioprinting of Low-Concentration Cell-Laden Gelatin Methacrylate (GelMA) Bioinks with a Two-Step Cross-linking Strategy.

Jun Yin1, Mengling Yan1, Yancheng Wang1, Jianzhong Fu1, Hairui Suo1.   

Abstract

Methacrylated gelatin (GelMA) has been widely used as a tissue-engineered scaffold material, but only low-concentration GelMA hydrogels were found to be promising cell-laden bioinks with excellent cell viability. In this work, we reported a strategy for precise deposition of 5% (w/v) cell-laden GelMA bioinks into controlled microarchitectures with high cell viability using extrusion-based three-dimensional (3D) bioprinting. By adding gelatin into GelMA bioinks, a two-step cross-linking combining the rapid and reversible thermo-cross-linking of gelatin with irreversible photo-cross-linking of GelMA was achieved. The GelMA/gelatin bioinks showed significant advantages in processability because the tunable rheology and the rapid thermo-cross-linking of bioinks improved the shape fidelity after bioprinting. Here, the rheology, mechanical properties, and swelling of GelMA/gelatin bioinks with different concentration ratios were carefully characterized to obtain the optimized bioprinting setup. We successfully printed the 5% (w/v) GelMA with 8% (w/v) gelatin into 3D structures, which had the similar geometrical resolution as that of the structures printed by 30% (w/v) GelMA bioinks. Moreover, the cell viability of 5/8% (w/v) GelMA/gelatin bioinks was demonstrated by in vitro culture and cell printing of bone marrow stem cells (BMSCs). Larger BMSC spreading area was found on 5/8% (w/v) GelMA/gelatin scaffolds, and the BMSC viability after the printing of 5/8% (w/v) GelMA/gelatin cell-laden bioinks was more than 90%, which was very close to the viability of printing pure 5% (w/v) GelMA cell-laden bioinks. Therefore, this printing strategy of GelMA/gelatin bioinks may extensively extend the applications of GelMA hydrogels for tissue engineering, organ printing, or drug delivery.

Entities:  

Keywords:  3D bioprinting; bioink; gelatin; processability; two-step cross-linking

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29405059     DOI: 10.1021/acsami.7b16059

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  ACS Appl Mater Interfaces        ISSN: 1944-8244            Impact factor:   9.229


  58 in total

1.  Efficient myotube formation in 3D bioprinted tissue construct by biochemical and topographical cues.

Authors:  WonJin Kim; Hyeongjin Lee; JiUn Lee; Anthony Atala; James J Yoo; Sang Jin Lee; Geun Hyung Kim
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2019-11-19       Impact factor: 12.479

2.  The effect of BMP-mimetic peptide tethering bioinks on the differentiation of dental pulp stem cells (DPSCs) in 3D bioprinted dental constructs.

Authors:  Ji Hoon Park; Gregory J Gillispie; Joshua S Copus; Weibo Zhang; Anthony Atala; James J Yoo; Pamela C Yelick; Sang Jin Lee
Journal:  Biofabrication       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 9.954

3.  Flow Behavior Prior to Crosslinking: The Need for Precursor Rheology for Placement of Hydrogels in Medical Applications and for 3D Bioprinting.

Authors:  Jakob M Townsend; Emily C Beck; Stevin H Gehrke; Cory J Berkland; Michael S Detamore
Journal:  Prog Polym Sci       Date:  2019-01-17       Impact factor: 29.190

4.  Bioprinting 101: Design, Fabrication, and Evaluation of Cell-Laden 3D Bioprinted Scaffolds.

Authors:  Kaivalya A Deo; Kanwar Abhay Singh; Charles W Peak; Daniel L Alge; Akhilesh K Gaharwar
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 3.845

5.  The Influence of Printing Parameters and Cell Density on Bioink Printing Outcomes.

Authors:  Gregory J Gillispie; Albert Han; Meryem Uzun-Per; John Fisher; Antonios G Mikos; Muhammad Khalid Khan Niazi; James J Yoo; Sang Jin Lee; Anthony Atala
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2020-10-14       Impact factor: 3.845

Review 6.  Physical and Chemical Factors Influencing the Printability of Hydrogel-based Extrusion Bioinks.

Authors:  Sang Cheon Lee; Gregory Gillispie; Peter Prim; Sang Jin Lee
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2020-08-20       Impact factor: 60.622

Review 7.  3D bioprinting of functional tissue models for personalized drug screening and in vitro disease modeling.

Authors:  Xuanyi Ma; Justin Liu; Wei Zhu; Min Tang; Natalie Lawrence; Claire Yu; Maling Gou; Shaochen Chen
Journal:  Adv Drug Deliv Rev       Date:  2018-06-21       Impact factor: 15.470

8.  Use of GelMA for 3D printing of cardiac myocytes and fibroblasts.

Authors:  Priyanka Koti; Narine Muselimyan; Eman Mirdamadi; Huda Asfour; Narine A Sarvazyan
Journal:  J 3D Print Med       Date:  2019-01-15

9.  Rheological Properties of Coordinated Physical Gelation and Chemical Crosslinking in Gelatin Methacryloyl (GelMA) Hydrogels.

Authors:  Ashlyn T Young; Olivia C White; Michael A Daniele
Journal:  Macromol Biosci       Date:  2020-08-28       Impact factor: 4.979

10.  Void-free 3D Bioprinting for In-situ Endothelialization and Microfluidic Perfusion.

Authors:  Liliang Ouyang; James P K Armstrong; Qu Chen; Yiyang Lin; Molly M Stevens
Journal:  Adv Funct Mater       Date:  2019-11-11       Impact factor: 18.808

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.