Literature DB >> 32925629

Characteristics Associated With Consent and Reasons for Declining in a Randomized Trial in Pregnancy.

Gail Mallett1, Kim Hill, Jessica de Voest, Sabine Z Bousleiman, Donna Allard, Stacy Harris, Ashley Salazar, Kelly Clark, Felecia Ortiz, Anna Bartholomew, Wendy Dalton, Jennifer Craig, Melissa Bickus.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the maternal characteristics associated with consent to a randomized trial of labor induction in pregnancy.
METHODS: This is a secondary analysis of low-risk nulliparous women randomized to induction of labor at 39 weeks or expectant management. During the trial, the Data and Safety Monitoring Committee requested additional fields on the screening log, which already included race and ethnicity: maternal age, type of insurance, and the reason for declining consent if declined.
RESULTS: From August 2016 (start of additional data collection) to August 2017, 1,965 (28%) of the 7,112 eligible women consented to the trial. Consent was more likely for Black women (41%, adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.47, 95% CI 1.24-1.74), and less likely for Asian women (15%, aOR 0.64, 95% CI 0.48-0.84), compared with White women (24%). Women without private insurance were more likely to consent (38%, aOR 1.55, 95% CI 1.34-1.79), compared with those with private insurance (22%). Younger women were also more likely to consent. Among eligible women who declined participation and provided a reason (68%), preference to be expectantly managed (85%) was most common, a response more common in Asian women (aOR 1.75, 95% CI 1.31-2.33) and less common in women without private insurance (aOR 0.60, 95% CI 0.51-0.70). Not wanting to participate in research was more common in Asian women (aOR 2.41, 95% CI 1.44-4.03). Declining consent because family or friends objected was more common in Asian women (aOR 2.51, 95% CI 1.27-4.95) and women without private insurance (aOR 1.68, 95% CI 1.10-2.59).
CONCLUSION: Frequency of consent and reasons for declining consent were associated with age, type of insurance, and race and ethnicity. These findings should be considered when developing recruitment strategies that promote diverse participant representation. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinialTrials.gov, NCT01990612.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32925629      PMCID: PMC7971102          DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000003998

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.623


  5 in total

1.  Improving recruitment to clinical trials during pregnancy: A mixed methods investigation.

Authors:  Sofia Strömmer; Wendy Lawrence; Taylor Rose; Christina Vogel; Daniella Watson; Joanne N Bottell; Janice Parmenter; Nicholas C Harvey; Cyrus Cooper; Hazel Inskip; Janis Baird; Mary Barker
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2018-01-17       Impact factor: 4.634

2.  The second wave: Toward responsible inclusion of pregnant women in research.

Authors:  Anne Drapkin Lyerly; Margaret Olivia Little; Ruth Faden
Journal:  Int J Fem Approaches Bioeth       Date:  2008

3.  Racial disparities in reported prenatal care advice from health care providers.

Authors:  M D Kogan; M Kotelchuck; G R Alexander; W E Johnson
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  Enrolling pregnant women: issues in clinical research.

Authors:  Mary C Blehar; Catherine Spong; Christine Grady; Sara F Goldkind; Leyla Sahin; Janine A Clayton
Journal:  Womens Health Issues       Date:  2013-01

5.  Labor Induction versus Expectant Management in Low-Risk Nulliparous Women.

Authors:  William A Grobman; Madeline M Rice; Uma M Reddy; Alan T N Tita; Robert M Silver; Gail Mallett; Kim Hill; Elizabeth A Thom; Yasser Y El-Sayed; Annette Perez-Delboy; Dwight J Rouse; George R Saade; Kim A Boggess; Suneet P Chauhan; Jay D Iams; Edward K Chien; Brian M Casey; Ronald S Gibbs; Sindhu K Srinivas; Geeta K Swamy; Hyagriv N Simhan; George A Macones
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2018-08-09       Impact factor: 91.245

  5 in total
  1 in total

1.  Induction of labor or expectant management? Birth outcomes for nulliparous individuals choosing midwifery care.

Authors:  Elise N Erickson; Joanne M Bailey; Shanti D Colo; Nicole S Carlson; Ellen L Tilden
Journal:  Birth       Date:  2021-05-28       Impact factor: 3.081

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.