Literature DB >> 23312713

Enrolling pregnant women: issues in clinical research.

Mary C Blehar1, Catherine Spong, Christine Grady, Sara F Goldkind, Leyla Sahin, Janine A Clayton.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Despite the fact that many pregnant women are affected by a range of serious health conditions and take medications for these conditions, there is widespread reticence to include them in clinical intervention research. Hence, their clinical care is typically not informed by evidence derived from pregnant populations.
METHOD: In October 2010, the National Institutes of Health Office of Research on Women's Health convened a workshop to address ethical, regulatory, and scientific issues raised by the enrollment of pregnant women in clinical research. This report summarizes three areas that emerged from that meeting as important next steps to be taken to promote ethically responsible and scientifically sound research during pregnancy.
FINDINGS: The three areas are: 1) Reclassify pregnant women from their current status in regulations as a "vulnerable" population to a scientifically "complex" population and change the presumption of exclusion to one of inclusion; 2) examine the institutional review boards' (IRB) gatekeeper role in interpreting regulations governing pregnancy research and identify steps to facilitate IRB approval of ethically informed pregnancy research; and 3) develop a pregnancy-focused research agenda that addresses pressing clinical needs, identifies opportunities to gather information from existing resources and studies, and encourages important new research areas.
CONCLUSION: Research is needed to address the therapeutic needs of pregnant women and to study pregnancy as it may shed light on a pregnant woman's later health and the health of her child. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23312713      PMCID: PMC3547525          DOI: 10.1016/j.whi.2012.10.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Womens Health Issues        ISSN: 1049-3867


  22 in total

1.  Enrolling pregnant women in research--lessons from the H1N1 influenza pandemic.

Authors:  Sara F Goldkind; Leyla Sahin; Beverly Gallauresi
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2010-06-17       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  A comprehensive ethical framework for responsibly designing and conducting pharmacologic research that involves pregnant women.

Authors:  Laurence B McCullough; John H Coverdale; Frank A Chervenak
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 8.661

3.  Epigenetic transgenerational actions of endocrine disruptors and male fertility.

Authors:  Matthew D Anway; Andrea S Cupp; Mehmet Uzumcu; Michael K Skinner
Journal:  Science       Date:  2005-06-03       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 4.  The developmental origins of adult disease (Barker) hypothesis.

Authors:  Hendrina A de Boo; Jane E Harding
Journal:  Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 2.100

5.  Drug safety in pregnant women and their babies: ignorance not bliss.

Authors:  C D Chambers; J E Polifka; J M Friedman
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2007-12-12       Impact factor: 6.875

6.  Clinical research enrolling pregnant women: a workshop summary.

Authors:  Mary A Foulkes; Christine Grady; Catherine Y Spong; Angela Bates; Janine A Clayton
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2011-08-05       Impact factor: 2.681

7.  Enrolling pregnant women in biomedical research.

Authors:  Ruth Macklin
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2010-02-20       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  Amoxicillin pharmacokinetics in pregnant women: modeling and simulations of dosage strategies.

Authors:  M A Andrew; T R Easterling; D B Carr; D Shen; M L Buchanan; T Rutherford; R Bennett; P Vicini; M F Hebert
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2007-02-28       Impact factor: 6.875

9.  The National Children's Study: a golden opportunity to advance the health of pregnant women.

Authors:  Anne Drapkin Lyerly; Margaret Olivia Little; Ruth R Faden
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2009-07-10       Impact factor: 9.308

10.  How do institutional review boards apply the federal risk and benefit standards for pediatric research?

Authors:  Seema Shah; Amy Whittle; Benjamin Wilfond; Gary Gensler; David Wendler
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2004-01-28       Impact factor: 56.272

View more
  73 in total

1.  The ethics and regulatory landscape of including vulnerable populations in pragmatic clinical trials.

Authors:  Mary Jane Welch; Rachel Lally; Jennifer E Miller; Stephanie Pittman; Lynda Brodsky; Arthur L Caplan; Gina Uhlenbrauck; Darcy M Louzao; James H Fischer; Benjamin Wilfond
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2015-09-15       Impact factor: 2.486

2.  Reasons Why Pregnant Women Participate in Ultrasound Research Involving Transvaginal Scans.

Authors:  Barbara T Meagher; Marissa R Campos; Patrick Thornton; Carrie Klima; Tara A Peters; Josefin Hallberg; Emma Ulfhager; William D O'Brien; Barbara L McFarlin
Journal:  J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2020-02-19       Impact factor: 2.153

3.  Recruitment and retention of pregnant women into clinical research trials: an overview of challenges, facilitators, and best practices.

Authors:  Paula M Frew; Diane S Saint-Victor; Margaret Brewinski Isaacs; Sonnie Kim; Geeta K Swamy; Jeanne S Sheffield; Kathryn M Edwards; Tonya Villafana; Ouda Kamagate; Kevin Ault
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2014-12-15       Impact factor: 9.079

4.  Leveraging digital media data for pharmacovigilance.

Authors:  Hammad Farooq; Junaid Suhail Niaz; Saira Fakhar; Hammad Naveed
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2021-01-25

5.  Overcoming Barriers and Identifying Opportunities for Developing Maternal Immunizations: Recommendations From the National Vaccine Advisory Committee.

Authors: 
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  2017-04-05       Impact factor: 2.792

6.  Social media mining for birth defects research: A rule-based, bootstrapping approach to collecting data for rare health-related events on Twitter.

Authors:  Ari Z Klein; Abeed Sarker; Haitao Cai; Davy Weissenbacher; Graciela Gonzalez-Hernandez
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2018-10-04       Impact factor: 6.317

7.  Pregnant women are still therapeutic orphans.

Authors:  Katherine L Wisner; Catherine S Stika; Katie Watson
Journal:  World Psychiatry       Date:  2020-10       Impact factor: 49.548

Review 8.  Differentiating Research, Quality Improvement, and Case Studies to Ethically Incorporate Pregnant Women.

Authors:  Julia C Phillippi; Katherine E Hartmann
Journal:  J Midwifery Womens Health       Date:  2017-12-28       Impact factor: 2.388

9.  Electronic Informed Consent to Facilitate Recruitment of Pregnant Women Into Research.

Authors:  Julia C Phillippi; Jennifer K Doersam; Jeremy L Neal; Christianne L Roumie
Journal:  J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs       Date:  2018-07

10.  Toward Earlier Inclusion of Pregnant and Postpartum Women in Tuberculosis Drug Trials: Consensus Statements From an International Expert Panel.

Authors:  Amita Gupta; Jyoti S Mathad; Susan M Abdel-Rahman; Jessica D Albano; Radu Botgros; Vikki Brown; Renee S Browning; Liza Dawson; Kelly E Dooley; Devasena Gnanashanmugam; Beatriz Grinsztejn; Sonia Hernandez-Diaz; Patrick Jean-Philippe; Peter Kim; Anne D Lyerly; Mark Mirochnick; Lynne M Mofenson; Grace Montepiedra; Jeanna Piper; Leyla Sahin; Radojka Savic; Betsy Smith; Hans Spiegel; Soumya Swaminathan; D Heather Watts; Amina White
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2015-12-09       Impact factor: 9.079

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.