Literature DB >> 30089070

Labor Induction versus Expectant Management in Low-Risk Nulliparous Women.

William A Grobman1, Madeline M Rice1, Uma M Reddy1, Alan T N Tita1, Robert M Silver1, Gail Mallett1, Kim Hill1, Elizabeth A Thom1, Yasser Y El-Sayed1, Annette Perez-Delboy1, Dwight J Rouse1, George R Saade1, Kim A Boggess1, Suneet P Chauhan1, Jay D Iams1, Edward K Chien1, Brian M Casey1, Ronald S Gibbs1, Sindhu K Srinivas1, Geeta K Swamy1, Hyagriv N Simhan1, George A Macones1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The perinatal and maternal consequences of induction of labor at 39 weeks among low-risk nulliparous women are uncertain.
METHODS: In this multicenter trial, we randomly assigned low-risk nulliparous women who were at 38 weeks 0 days to 38 weeks 6 days of gestation to labor induction at 39 weeks 0 days to 39 weeks 4 days or to expectant management. The primary outcome was a composite of perinatal death or severe neonatal complications; the principal secondary outcome was cesarean delivery.
RESULTS: A total of 3062 women were assigned to labor induction, and 3044 were assigned to expectant management. The primary outcome occurred in 4.3% of neonates in the induction group and in 5.4% in the expectant-management group (relative risk, 0.80; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.64 to 1.00). The frequency of cesarean delivery was significantly lower in the induction group than in the expectant-management group (18.6% vs. 22.2%; relative risk, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.76 to 0.93).
CONCLUSIONS: Induction of labor at 39 weeks in low-risk nulliparous women did not result in a significantly lower frequency of a composite adverse perinatal outcome, but it did result in a significantly lower frequency of cesarean delivery. (Funded by the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development; ARRIVE ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01990612 .).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30089070      PMCID: PMC6186292          DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1800566

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  N Engl J Med        ISSN: 0028-4793            Impact factor:   91.245


  25 in total

1.  Maternal and neonatal morbidity among nulliparous women undergoing elective induction of labor.

Authors:  Joycelyn H Vardo; Loralei L Thornburg; J Christopher Glantz
Journal:  J Reprod Med       Date:  2011 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 0.142

2.  Neonatal outcomes in early term birth.

Authors:  Laura I Parikh; Uma M Reddy; Tuija Männistö; Pauline Mendola; Lindsey Sjaarda; Stefanie Hinkle; Zhen Chen; Zhaohui Lu; S Katherine Laughon
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2014-03-12       Impact factor: 8.661

3.  Elective induction compared with expectant management in nulliparous women with an unfavorable cervix.

Authors:  Sarah Osmundson; Robin J Ou-Yang; William A Grobman
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 7.661

4.  The Labour Agentry Scale: psychometric properties of an instrument measuring control during childbirth.

Authors:  E D Hodnett; D A Simmons-Tropea
Journal:  Res Nurs Health       Date:  1987-10       Impact factor: 2.228

5.  Whole-body hypothermia for neonates with hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy.

Authors:  Seetha Shankaran; Abbot R Laptook; Richard A Ehrenkranz; Jon E Tyson; Scott A McDonald; Edward F Donovan; Avroy A Fanaroff; W Kenneth Poole; Linda L Wright; Rosemary D Higgins; Neil N Finer; Waldemar A Carlo; Shahnaz Duara; William Oh; C Michael Cotten; David K Stevenson; Barbara J Stoll; James A Lemons; Ronnie Guillet; Alan H Jobe
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2005-10-13       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  How do maternal views of delivery outcomes vary by demographics and preferred mode of delivery?

Authors:  Teresa N Sparks; Amanda Yeaton-Massey; Jesus M Granados; Stephanie J Handler; Michelle Meyer; Aaron B Caughey
Journal:  Am J Perinatol       Date:  2014-12-17       Impact factor: 1.862

Review 7.  Systematic review: elective induction of labor versus expectant management of pregnancy.

Authors:  Aaron B Caughey; Vandana Sundaram; Anjali J Kaimal; Allison Gienger; Yvonne W Cheng; Kathryn M McDonald; Brian L Shaffer; Douglas K Owens; Dena M Bravata
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2009-08-18       Impact factor: 25.391

8.  Elective induction of labor at term compared with expectant management: maternal and neonatal outcomes.

Authors:  Blair G Darney; Jonathan M Snowden; Yvonne W Cheng; Lorie Jacob; James M Nicholson; Anjali Kaimal; Sascha Dublin; Darios Getahun; Aaron B Caughey
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 7.661

9.  Moving toward patient-centered care: Women's decisions, perceptions, and experiences of the induction of labor process.

Authors:  Jennifer E Moore; Lisa Kane Low; Marita G Titler; Vanessa K Dalton; Carolyn M Sampselle
Journal:  Birth       Date:  2014-04-06       Impact factor: 3.689

10.  Outcomes of elective induction of labour compared with expectant management: population based study.

Authors:  Sarah J Stock; Evelyn Ferguson; Andrew Duffy; Ian Ford; James Chalmers; Jane E Norman
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2012-05-10
View more
  126 in total

1.  Using the Robson 10-Group Classification System to Compare Cesarean Birth Utilization Between US Centers With and Without Midwives.

Authors:  Denise Colter Smith; Julia C Phillippi; Nancy K Lowe; Rachel Blankstein Breman; Nicole S Carlson; Jeremy L Neal; Eric Gutierrez; Ellen L Tilden
Journal:  J Midwifery Womens Health       Date:  2019-09-25       Impact factor: 2.388

2.  Healthy Birth Practice #1: Let Labor Begin on Its Own.

Authors:  Debby Amis
Journal:  J Perinat Educ       Date:  2019-04-01

3.  Utility of the 5-Minute Apgar Score as a Research Endpoint.

Authors:  Marit L Bovbjerg; Mekhala V Dissanayake; Melissa Cheyney; Jennifer Brown; Jonathan M Snowden
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2019-09-01       Impact factor: 4.897

4.  Universal late pregnancy ultrasound screening to predict adverse outcomes in nulliparous women: a systematic review and cost-effectiveness analysis.

Authors:  Gordon Cs Smith; Alexandros A Moraitis; David Wastlund; Jim G Thornton; Aris Papageorghiou; Julia Sanders; Alexander Ep Heazell; Stephen C Robson; Ulla Sovio; Peter Brocklehurst; Edward Cf Wilson
Journal:  Health Technol Assess       Date:  2021-02       Impact factor: 4.014

5.  A Tribute to Nancy C. Chescheir, MD.

Authors:  Dwight J Rouse; Thomas W Riggs; John O Schorge
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2021-01-01       Impact factor: 7.661

6.  Impact of a Policy to Deliver at 39 Weeks for the Indication of Class III Obesity.

Authors:  Stephanie L Pierce; Marta E Maxted; Jennifer D Peck; Jessica S Lutz; Maria F Lopez-Davila; Frederico Vieira; Courtney B Atchley; Rodney K Edwards
Journal:  Obesity (Silver Spring)       Date:  2020-02-05       Impact factor: 5.002

7.  Labour and delivery: a clinician's perspective on a biomechanics problem.

Authors:  Helen Feltovich
Journal:  Interface Focus       Date:  2019-08-16       Impact factor: 3.906

8.  Health resource utilization of labor induction versus expectant management.

Authors:  William A Grobman; Grecio Sandoval; Uma M Reddy; Alan T N Tita; Robert M Silver; Gail Mallett; Kim Hill; Madeline Murguia Rice; Yasser Y El-Sayed; Ronald J Wapner; Dwight J Rouse; George R Saade; John M Thorp; Suneet P Chauhan; Jay D Iams; Edward K Chien; Brian M Casey; Ronald S Gibbs; Sindhu K Srinivas; Geeta K Swamy; Hyagriv N Simhan; George A Macones
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2020-01-10       Impact factor: 8.661

9.  Outcomes of Elective Induction of Labor versus Expectant Management among Obese Women at ≥39 Weeks.

Authors:  Anna Palatnik; Michelle A Kominiarek
Journal:  Am J Perinatol       Date:  2019-04-30       Impact factor: 1.862

10.  American Society of Hematology 2018 guidelines for management of venous thromboembolism: venous thromboembolism in the context of pregnancy.

Authors:  Shannon M Bates; Anita Rajasekhar; Saskia Middeldorp; Claire McLintock; Marc A Rodger; Andra H James; Sara R Vazquez; Ian A Greer; John J Riva; Meha Bhatt; Nicole Schwab; Danielle Barrett; Andrea LaHaye; Bram Rochwerg
Journal:  Blood Adv       Date:  2018-11-27
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.