Literature DB >> 32923158

Repurposing CD8+ T cell immunity against SARS-CoV-2 for cancer immunotherapy: a positive aspect of the COVID-19 pandemic?

Shashi Gujar1,2,3,4, Jonathan G Pol5,6,7, Youra Kim1, Guido Kroemer5,6,7,8,9,10,11.   

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic has afflicted most countries on the planet. As a result, immunity against SARS-CoV-2, induced via natural infections or imminent vaccinations, is expected to develop in a large fraction of the global population. Here, we propose to exploit SARS-CoV-2-specific CD8+ T cells for cancer immunotherapy strategies.
© 2020 The Author(s). Published with license by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CD8+ T cell epitopes; SARS-CoV-2; antigen spreading; antiviral immunity; cancer immunotherapy

Year:  2020        PMID: 32923158      PMCID: PMC7458627          DOI: 10.1080/2162402X.2020.1794424

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oncoimmunology        ISSN: 2162-4011            Impact factor:   8.110


The pandemic of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), caused by the emergent virus named severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2), has put the whole world on pause. As of July 6, 2020, SARS-CoV-2 infections have been confirmed in approximately 11.4 M people, have caused more than 530,000 deaths, and have been reported by nearly all countries in the world. COVID-19 is a respiratory illness characterized by a range of symptoms such as cough, fever, and dyspnea.[1,2] In severe COVID-19 cases, an acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is often manifested and requires mechanical ventilation. It is becoming clear that the outcome of SARS-CoV-2 infection and the underlying COVID-19 pathology is regulated by the interaction between the virus and the host immune system. In line with the key role of the immune system, patients who have immune-related co-morbidities are more prone to develop severe disease following SARS-CoV-2 infection, and the activation or suppression of the host immune response has become a reliable predictor of COVID-19 outcomes.[1-3]

SARS-CoV-2 induces antiviral CD8+ T cell responses

Antiviral immune defenses regulate the outcomes of viral infections wherein concerted actions of the innate and adaptive arms restrict the replication and spread of the virus.[4] Based on the available evidence, SARS-CoV-2 likely generates danger signals (e.g., microbe-associated molecular patterns [MAMPs] such as viral RNA and proteins, and damage-associated molecular patterns [DAMPs] from dying pneumocytes), thereby engaging various pattern recognition receptors (PRRs) including Toll-like receptors (TLRs), nucleotide-binding oligomerization domain [NOD]-like receptors (NLRs), and RIG-I-like receptors (RLRs).[3] Such virus-induced signaling through PRRs drives an inflammatory cascade encompassing type I and III interferons (IFNs) that inhibits virus replication and facilitates the presentation of viral epitopes by antigen-presenting cells (APCs) for priming of T and B cells. In particular, primed CD8+ T cells identify viral epitopes bound to major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class-I molecules of virus-infected cells, eliminate the virus replication niche in an antigen-specific manner, and maintain immunological memory following the resolution of the disease (herein termed as antiviral CD8 T cells). Indeed, strong effector, as well as memory, CD8+ T cell immunity is a hallmark of many common human viral infections. Data from patients who have recovered from SARS-CoV-2 infection suggest that a prototypical antiviral CD8+ T cell response accompanies SARS-CoV-2 infection.[1,2,5-7] Similar SARS-CoV-2-specific CD8+ T cell responses are expected to be induced following the administration of appropriate vaccines that are being developed by competing public and private laboratories. Thus, SARS-CoV-2-specific antiviral CD8+ T cell responses, raised upon natural infections or anticipated vaccine campaigns, are set to be prevalent in tens, perhaps hundreds, of millions of individuals.

Antitumor CD8+ T cells mediate the actions and clinical efficacy of mainstream immunotherapies

Tumor antigen-specific CD8 T cells (herein called as antitumor CD8 T cells) represent a major effector entity within modern cancer immunotherapies, as they identify and kill malignant cells expressing cognate cancer-specific epitopes without causing harm to nonmalignant cells. Once activated, antitumor CD8 T cells can eliminate not only existing but also recurrent cancer cells, thus holding the key for long-term cancer-free health. Furthermore, in addition to targeting cancer cells within the local tumor microenvironment (TME), CD8 T cells can detect and destroy cancer cells at distant metastatic niches. Not surprisingly, the actions of antitumor CD8 T cells form the foundation of many promising cancer immunotherapies, including those employing immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) with monoclonal antibodies against programmed death 1 (PD-1), programmed death-ligand 1 (PDL-1), or cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (CTLA-4).[8] Indeed, the antitumor CD8 T cell response has become a highly reliable indicator of positive outcomes in cancer patients, and novel strategies activating antitumor CD8+ T cells are fiercely pursued.

Antiviral CD8+ T cells can be repurposed for antitumor actions

Although antiviral and antitumor CD8 T cells bear distinct T cell receptors (TCRs) against virus- and tumor-derived MHC-I-presented ligands (i.e., epitopes), respectively, newly reported immunotherapy strategies now allow for ‘repurposing’ of antiviral CD8 T cells for antitumor functions.[9,10] For this purpose, synthetic immunogenic viral epitopes are administered in a way that they bind to MHC-I molecules on the surface of tumor cells. These viral epitope-presenting tumor cells simulate a reinfection event and ‘trick’ antiviral CD8 T cells into an anticancer attack. Even adjuvant-free injection of synthetic viral epitopes suffices to stimulate an antiviral CD8 T cell-mediated attack against cancer cells.[9] This repurposing of antiviral CD8 T cells for anticancer therapy is potentiated by the actions of ICIs that are currently approved for clinical use.[9,10] Of note, possible systemic side effects on healthy tissues within these repurposing approaches can be controlled by confining the expression of exogenously supplied viral peptide to the TME. These previously unknown nascent advances in the cancer immunotherapy field[9,10] now pave a new direction for exploiting preexisting antiviral CD8+ T cells arising from common human viral infections for antitumor therapeutic implications. It is noteworthy that, as compared to antitumor CD8 T cells, antiviral CD8 T cells often display better breadth, polyclonality, frequency, and functionality as they are generated against highly immunogenic ‘non-self’ epitopes from viral antigens. Furthermore, the negative effects of host factors dampening the therapeutically relevant traits of antitumor CD8 T cells, such as thymic or systemic tolerance and the immunosuppressive TME, remain negligible or absent in the context of antiviral CD8 T cells. Finally, the specificity of antiviral CD8 T cells against ‘non-self’ epitopes minimizes possible autoreactivity during the repurposing regimens. In summary, antiviral CD8 T cells, bearing an inherently superior immunological competence of clinical importance than antitumor CD8 T cells, represent a potent avenue to formulate highly efficacious cancer immunotherapies.

SARS-CoV-2-specific CD8+ T cells can be repurposed for cancer immunotherapy strategies

Antiviral CD8 T cells specific for previously encountered viral infections (e.g., cytomegalovirus [CMV], Epstein-Barr virus [EBV], influenza virus) are abundantly found within human tumors, and have been successfully repurposed to induce antitumor immune responses.[9-12] Considering the relatively recent emergence and transmission of SARS-CoV-2 in humans, the underlying antiviral adaptive immune response is expected to display appropriate epitope dominancy devoid of features of ‘antigenic sin’ observed for common infections like influenza. Evidence thus far shows that prototypical effector and memory CD8 T cell responses are observed in patients who have recovered from COVID-19.[1,3] Thus, administration of SARS-CoV-2 antigens or immunogenic epitopes directed to be presented by class-I human leukocyte antigens (HLAs) would represent a clinically feasible and readily applicable approach for repurposing SARS-CoV-2-specific CD8 T cell responses for anticancer immunotherapy (Figure 1). Herein, the delivery of SARS-CoV-2 epitopes within the TME could be achieved via direct intratumoral injection[9,10] or using antibody-peptide epitope conjugates (APECs) programed to specifically target tumor cells.[9,10] It is noteworthy that worldwide major efforts are currently being dedicated to map SARS-CoV-2 epitopes in the context of diverse human HLA haplotypes and that this knowledge will facilitate the exploitation of SARS-CoV-2-specific CD8 T cell immunity. Recent findings have demonstrated the cross-reactivity of SARS-CoV-2 specific epitopes in inducing T cell responses in SARS-CoV-1 recovered patients and SARS-CoV-1/2 unexposed individuals due to the high sequence homology between SARS-CoV-2 and other betacoronaviruses.[5-7] The presence of such antiviral T cells in non-COVID-19 patients further increases the percentage of the general population who may benefit from repurposing SARS-CoV-2-specific immunity to target cancer. Furthermore, antiviral CD8 T cells in patients with COVID-19 express immune checkpoints such as PD-1 and T cell immunoglobulin mucin 3 (TIM-3) and thus are amenable for ICI-based immune potentiation of cancer immunotherapy strategies. Thus, similar to the antiviral CD8+ T cells against CMV and EBV, SARS-CoV-2-specific CD8+ T cells possess antitumor potential that can be harnessed within cancer immunotherapy approaches.
Figure 1.

Repurposing SARS-CoV-2-specific antiviral CD8+ T cells for cancer immunotherapy. Patients recovered from COVID-19 or immunized with the relevant vaccines are expected to develop CD8+ T cell immunity against SARS-CoV-2. Tumors developing later on in SARS-CoV-2-immunity-bearing individuals will likely host SARS-CoV-2-specific CD8+ T cells that could be repurposed to target cancer cells. In this therapeutic approach, delivery of SARS-CoV-2-derived immunogenic epitopes (via, for example, adjuvant-free intratumoral injection or antibody-peptide epitope conjugates[9,10]) results in their presentation by MHC-I molecules on the surface of cancer cells. Consequently, antiviral CD8+ T cells recognize their cognate epitopes and get ‘tricked’ into killing these cancer cells, simulating a virus infection (direct antitumor benefits of antiviral CD8+ T cells). Additionally, the spreading of tumor antigens released during the initial direct killing by antiviral CD8+ T cells facilitates their cross-presentation by APCs and the induction of an antitumor immunity that will attack any residual or recurring cancer cells (indirect antitumor benefits of antiviral CD8+ T cells). Interestingly, the antitumor benefits of such antiviral CD8+ T cell repurposing approaches can be further potentiated with immune checkpoint inhibitors. CTL, cytotoxic CD8+ T lymphocyte; MHC-I, major histocompatibility complex class-I; TME, tumor microenvironment.

Repurposing SARS-CoV-2-specific antiviral CD8+ T cells for cancer immunotherapy. Patients recovered from COVID-19 or immunized with the relevant vaccines are expected to develop CD8+ T cell immunity against SARS-CoV-2. Tumors developing later on in SARS-CoV-2-immunity-bearing individuals will likely host SARS-CoV-2-specific CD8+ T cells that could be repurposed to target cancer cells. In this therapeutic approach, delivery of SARS-CoV-2-derived immunogenic epitopes (via, for example, adjuvant-free intratumoral injection or antibody-peptide epitope conjugates[9,10]) results in their presentation by MHC-I molecules on the surface of cancer cells. Consequently, antiviral CD8+ T cells recognize their cognate epitopes and get ‘tricked’ into killing these cancer cells, simulating a virus infection (direct antitumor benefits of antiviral CD8+ T cells). Additionally, the spreading of tumor antigens released during the initial direct killing by antiviral CD8+ T cells facilitates their cross-presentation by APCs and the induction of an antitumor immunity that will attack any residual or recurring cancer cells (indirect antitumor benefits of antiviral CD8+ T cells). Interestingly, the antitumor benefits of such antiviral CD8+ T cell repurposing approaches can be further potentiated with immune checkpoint inhibitors. CTL, cytotoxic CD8+ T lymphocyte; MHC-I, major histocompatibility complex class-I; TME, tumor microenvironment.

Viruses and antiviral immunity form the core of emerging cancer therapy approaches

Viruses, viral infections, virus-based therapeutics, and virus-induced host immune responses can be harnessed within cancer immunotherapy approaches. Full remissions from cancer following viral infections have been reported throughout the history of modern medicine, and virus-based platforms are poised to become mainstream cancer immunotherapies.[13] For example, remissions from leukemia, Hodgkin’s disease and lymphoma have been well documented after influenza, chicken pox, and measles infections. These historic observations led to the development of ‘cancer-killing’ viruses, commonly known as oncolytic viruses (OVs), which preferentially replicate in and kill malignant cells without causing similar effects on healthy cells. These OVs, which are under investigation in numerous clinical trials,[14] are now being widely acknowledged for their capacity to induce antitumor immunological benefits, including antitumor CD8 T cell immune responses.[15] First, OV-induced antiviral immunity overrides tumor-associated immune evasion mechanisms and reinstates the effector functions of otherwise exhausted T cells. OV-expressed MAMPs and oncolysis-released DAMPs promote effective APC function and efficient priming of T cells. OV-mediated tumor cell lysis also favors antigen spreading.[16,17] This phenomenon enlarges the spectrum of epitopes presented to the adaptive immune system and triggers a shift from a purely virus-oriented response toward a cancer cell-specific reactivity. In fine, OVs promote effective antitumor immunity and make tumors immunologically ‘hot’ through increasing T cell infiltration, thus sensitizing them to transversal immunotherapy with ICIs.[4] Similarly, other microbe-related compounds (e.g., bacillus Calmette-Guérin [BCG] instillations for bladder cancer treatment) can act as immunostimulatory agents, induce cancer immunogenic cell death (ICD), and promote antitumor immunity. Finally, the local/intratumoral injection of seasonal flu, rotavirus, or yellow fever vaccines have proven potent anticancer effects.[18] Thus, viruses (and bacteria) are contending to become a part of the legitimate armamentarium against cancers. Whether SARS-CoV-2 could be exploited within such anticancer strategies will be of great interest. These efforts could for example use SARS-CoV-2 for engineering novel OV platforms or making tumors hot. Similarly, as it has been done with vaccines against rotavirus, influenza, and yellow fever viruses,[18] anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccines could be directly injected within the TME to promote tumoricidal immune activities. It is worth noting that the cancer immunotherapy strategies discussed in this section rely on engaging the actions of antitumor CD8 T cells. Thus, in line with novel strategies allowing for repurposing of antiviral CD8 T cells, cancer immunotherapies simultaneously harvesting both tumor- and SARS-CoV-2-specific CD8 T cells promise to produce potentiated clinical benefits against cancers.

Conclusion

Based on the current state-of-the-art immunotherapy approaches, antiviral CD8 T cell immunity induced by SARS-CoV-2 infections or vaccines might be harnessed for cancer immunotherapies against cancers of various types. Considering the tropism of SARS-CoV-2 for epithelial cells of nasal, bronchial, and bronchiolar mucosae,[19] stimulation of virus-specific tissue-resident memory T cells could be of particular interest for treating cancers developing in the respiratory tract of patients immunized with COVID-19-preventing vaccines or recovered from SARS-CoV-2 infections.
  16 in total

Review 1.  Dissecting the mechanisms of immune checkpoint therapy.

Authors:  Padmanee Sharma; James P Allison
Journal:  Nat Rev Immunol       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 53.106

2.  Autologous T-cell therapy for cytomegalovirus as a consolidative treatment for recurrent glioblastoma.

Authors:  Andrea Schuessler; Corey Smith; Leone Beagley; Glen M Boyle; Sweera Rehan; Katherine Matthews; Linda Jones; Tania Crough; Vijayendra Dasari; Kerenaftali Klein; Amy Smalley; Hamish Alexander; David G Walker; Rajiv Khanna
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2014-05-04       Impact factor: 12.701

3.  Antibody-mediated delivery of viral epitopes to tumors harnesses CMV-specific T cells for cancer therapy.

Authors:  David G Millar; Rakesh R Ramjiawan; Kosuke Kawaguchi; Nisha Gupta; Jiang Chen; Songfa Zhang; Takashi Nojiri; William W Ho; Shuichi Aoki; Keehoon Jung; Ivy Chen; Feng Shi; James M Heather; Kohei Shigeta; Laura T Morton; Sean Sepulveda; Li Wan; Ricky Joseph; Eleanor Minogue; Ashok Khatri; Aditya Bardia; Leif W Ellisen; Ryan B Corcoran; Aaron N Hata; Sara I Pai; Rakesh K Jain; Dai Fukumura; Dan G Duda; Mark Cobbold
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2020-02-10       Impact factor: 54.908

4.  Clinical and immunological features of severe and moderate coronavirus disease 2019.

Authors:  Guang Chen; Di Wu; Wei Guo; Yong Cao; Da Huang; Hongwu Wang; Tao Wang; Xiaoyun Zhang; Huilong Chen; Haijing Yu; Xiaoping Zhang; Minxia Zhang; Shiji Wu; Jianxin Song; Tao Chen; Meifang Han; Shusheng Li; Xiaoping Luo; Jianping Zhao; Qin Ning
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2020-05-01       Impact factor: 14.808

5.  Treatment of nasopharyngeal carcinoma with Epstein-Barr virus--specific T lymphocytes.

Authors:  Karin C M Straathof; Catherine M Bollard; Uday Popat; M Helen Huls; Teresita Lopez; M Craig Morriss; Mary V Gresik; Adrian P Gee; Heidi V Russell; Malcolm K Brenner; Cliona M Rooney; Helen E Heslop
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2004-11-12       Impact factor: 22.113

6.  Phenotype and kinetics of SARS-CoV-2-specific T cells in COVID-19 patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome.

Authors:  Daniela Weiskopf; Katharina S Schmitz; Alessandro Sette; Rory D de Vries; Matthijs P Raadsen; Alba Grifoni; Nisreen M A Okba; Henrik Endeman; Johannes P C van den Akker; Richard Molenkamp; Marion P G Koopmans; Eric C M van Gorp; Bart L Haagmans; Rik L de Swart
Journal:  Sci Immunol       Date:  2020-06-26

7.  Repurposing infectious disease vaccines for intratumoral immunotherapy.

Authors:  Ignacio Melero; Maria Gato; Tala Shekarian; Angela Aznar; Sandrine Valsesia-Wittmann; Christophe Caux; Iñaki Etxeberrria; Alvaro Teijeira; Aurelien Marabelle
Journal:  J Immunother Cancer       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 13.751

8.  Double-slit photoelectron interference in strong-field ionization of the neon dimer.

Authors:  Maksim Kunitski; Nicolas Eicke; Pia Huber; Jonas Köhler; Stefan Zeller; Jörg Voigtsberger; Nikolai Schlott; Kevin Henrichs; Hendrik Sann; Florian Trinter; Lothar Ph H Schmidt; Anton Kalinin; Markus S Schöffler; Till Jahnke; Manfred Lein; Reinhard Dörner
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2019-01-02       Impact factor: 14.919

9.  Targets of T Cell Responses to SARS-CoV-2 Coronavirus in Humans with COVID-19 Disease and Unexposed Individuals.

Authors:  Alba Grifoni; Daniela Weiskopf; Sydney I Ramirez; Jose Mateus; Jennifer M Dan; Carolyn Rydyznski Moderbacher; Stephen A Rawlings; Aaron Sutherland; Lakshmanane Premkumar; Ramesh S Jadi; Daniel Marrama; Aravinda M de Silva; April Frazier; Aaron F Carlin; Jason A Greenbaum; Bjoern Peters; Florian Krammer; Davey M Smith; Shane Crotty; Alessandro Sette
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2020-05-20       Impact factor: 66.850

10.  Breadth of concomitant immune responses prior to patient recovery: a case report of non-severe COVID-19.

Authors:  Irani Thevarajan; Thi H O Nguyen; Marios Koutsakos; Julian Druce; Leon Caly; Carolien E van de Sandt; Xiaoxiao Jia; Suellen Nicholson; Mike Catton; Benjamin Cowie; Steven Y C Tong; Sharon R Lewin; Katherine Kedzierska
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 87.241

View more
  5 in total

1.  Antibody-mediated delivery of a viral MHC-I epitope into the cytosol of target tumor cells repurposes virus-specific CD8+ T cells for cancer immunotherapy.

Authors:  Keunok Jung; Min-Jeong Son; Se-Young Lee; Jeong-Ah Kim; Deok-Han Ko; Sojung Yoo; Chul-Ho Kim; Yong-Sung Kim
Journal:  Mol Cancer       Date:  2022-04-22       Impact factor: 41.444

Review 2.  Essential considerations during vaccine design against COVID-19 and review of pioneering vaccine candidate platforms.

Authors:  Maryam Bayat; Yahya Asemani; Sajad Najafi
Journal:  Int Immunopharmacol       Date:  2021-04-15       Impact factor: 5.714

Review 3.  CD8+ T Cells in SARS-CoV-2 Induced Disease and Cancer-Clinical Perspectives.

Authors:  Keywan Mortezaee; Jamal Majidpoor
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2022-04-01       Impact factor: 8.786

4.  Preinduced reovirus-specific T-cell immunity enhances the anticancer efficacy of reovirus therapy.

Authors:  Christianne Groeneveldt; Priscilla Kinderman; Jordi J C van Stigt Thans; Camilla Labrie; Lisa Griffioen; Marjolein Sluijter; Diana J M van den Wollenberg; Rob C Hoeben; Joke M M den Haan; Sjoerd H van der Burg; Thorbald van Hall; Nadine van Montfoort
Journal:  J Immunother Cancer       Date:  2022-07       Impact factor: 12.469

Review 5.  SARS-CoV-2-Induced Gut Microbiome Dysbiosis: Implications for Colorectal Cancer.

Authors:  Mark C Howell; Ryan Green; Andrew R McGill; Rinku Dutta; Subhra Mohapatra; Shyam S Mohapatra
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-28       Impact factor: 6.639

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.