Literature DB >> 32102830

Repurposing infectious disease vaccines for intratumoral immunotherapy.

Ignacio Melero1, Maria Gato2, Tala Shekarian3, Angela Aznar2, Sandrine Valsesia-Wittmann3, Christophe Caux3, Iñaki Etxeberrria2, Alvaro Teijeira2, Aurelien Marabelle4.   

Abstract

Intratumoral delivery of viruses and virus-associated molecular patterns can achieve antitumor effects that are largely mediated by the elicitation or potentiation of immune responses against the malignancy. Attenuated vaccines are approved and marketed as good manufactiring practice (GMP)-manufactured agents whose administration might be able to induce such effects. Recent reports in mouse transplantable tumor models indicate that the rotavirus, influenza and yellow fever vaccines can be especially suitable to elicit powerful antitumor immunity against cancer following intratumoral administration. These results highlight that intratumoral anti-infectious vaccines can turn cold tumors into hot, and underscore the key role played by virus-induced type I interferon pathways to overcome resistance to immune checkpoint-targeted antibodies. © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Entities:  

Keywords:  immunology; virology

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32102830      PMCID: PMC7057427          DOI: 10.1136/jitc-2019-000443

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Immunother Cancer        ISSN: 2051-1426            Impact factor:   13.751


From Coley’s clinical experiments with local treatment with bacteria or bacteria toxins1 to the generalized use of bacillusof Calmette and Guerin (BCG) for superficial bladder cancer,1 multiple lines of evidence suggest that local instigation of infectious micro-organisms or synthetic molecules mimicking their components, the so-called pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs) acting as pattern recognition receptor agonists (PRRs), can be beneficial against cancers.2 In the case of viruses, multiple attempts have been made to focus cytopathic effects against cancer, using the so-termed oncolytic viruses. Mounting evidence indicates that replication-competent oncolytic viruses and replication-defective viral vectors exert their therapeutic effects mainly as a result of more potent antitumor immune responses.3 Such efficacy can be augmented when the genome of the virus is armed with genes that enhance immunity, such as cytokines and costimulatory factors.3 Intratumoral engineered variants of adenovirus, vaccinia virus, herpes simplex 1 virus (HSV), Newcastle disease virus and reovirus have shown remarkable activity in preclinical models and have progressed or are progressing to the clinic. The most advanced agent of this kind is T-vec (Talimogene laherparepvec), an attenuated HSV engineered to encode granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) which is approved for intratumoral infection in advanced melanoma4 and which seems to render synergistic effects if combined with systemic treatment with anti-cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen 4 (CTLA-4)5 or anti-programmed death-ligand 1 (PD1)6 monoclonal antibodies as immune checkpoint inhibitors. In essence, the main factors that determine the antitumor effect are believed to be due to (1) immunogenic tumor cell death that releases antigens that can be presented by dendritic cells (especially cDC1 cells) and presentation of immunostimulatory molecules (calreticulin membrane expression, ATP release in the tumor microenvironment)7; (2) presence of moieties that are recognized by innate receptors of the immune system, triggering maturation of dendritic cells and causing local inflammation notably via type I interferon secretion7; and (3) recruitment and activation of antitumor T cells.7 In this scenario our group set out to identify routinely used attenuated viral vaccines that could be used via the intratumoral route. The advantage of repurposing such approved and marketed agents is that clinical development would be much simplified based on solid safety records. Rotavirus infection is a serious threat causing severe diarrhea in infants. Attenuated vaccines are protective when orally given. These commercially available double-stranded RNA (dsRNA) viral attenuated strains turned out to be very potent stimulators of the nuclear factor kappa-light-chain-enhancer of activated B cells (NFκΒ) and type I interferon pathways. Interestingly, this stimulation is independent from the innate Toll-like immune receptors but dependent on another PRRs known as retinoic acid induced gene 1 (RIG-I), which is able to detect intracytoplasmic dsRNA.8 Furthermore, rotavirus exerts cytopathic effects, killing a variety of both adult and pediatric cancer cell lines in culture with features of immunogenic cell death (ATP release).7 Interestingly, if given intratumorally to mouse bearing transplantable tumors, including pediatric syngeneic neuroblastoma murine models, remarkable local therapeutic effects are elicited that are dependent on natural killer cells (NK), CD4 and CD8 T cell immunity. Most importantly, in murine models that are refractory to immune checkpoint-targeted therapies, intratumoral rotavirus is able to synergize and overcome resistance to anti-CTLA-4 or anti-PD-L1 monoclonal antibodies, including against tumor lesions growing subcutaneously on the contralateral uninjected flank (anenestic effect). It is of important note that prevaccination of mice prior such intratumoral virotherapy does not spoil efficacy. In the same line, the yellow fever vaccine strain 17D used for travelers and dwellers in endemic areas is also cytopathic for a large panel of human and mouse tumor cell lines, and intratumor administration clearly delays tumor progression in a manner mediated by CD8 T cell immunity with some measurable effect against non-injected concomitant tumors.10 Very importantly, efficacy was potentiated by previous vaccination against the virus in a manner dependent on T cell antiviral immunity. In this case additive effects with systemic immunostimulatory monoclonal antibodies directed to anti-PD1 or anti-CD137 were found. Similarly, Newman et al reported that intratumoral injections of anti-influenza vaccines could also elicit immune-mediated antitumor activity in an aggressive melanoma syngeneic transplantable tumor model (Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS), in press). Similar to the rotavirus observation, inactivated influenza virus was sufficient to show activity against tumors on intratumoral administration. However, and most surprisingly, only unadjuvanted inactivated influenza vaccines were able to generate such antitumor efficacy. Indeed, squalene-based adjuvanted influenza vaccines were losing their antitumor activity because adjuvants were recruiting interleukin-10-secreting B regulatory cells. Importantly, for none of these three strategies, pre-existing immunization against the corresponding pathogen/vaccine did preclude the antitumor efficacy of its intratumoral delivery. It is to be considered that while 17D yellow fever and influenza vaccines are approved for injected routes of administration, rotavirus vaccines are only approved for oral administration. However, because rotavirus vaccines have mostly polysaccharides as adjuvants, they should, like for yellow fever and influenza vaccines, be amenable to a rapid clinical translation for in situ virus-vaccine cancer immunotherapy. All considered, these new studies open the field for repurposing viral vaccines in strategies combining local virotherapy and other immunotherapy agents (figure 1). This is not at odds with intratumoral compounds based on viral immunity such as Toll-like receptor (TLR3, TLR9) or stimulator of interferon genes protein (STING) agonists that are being developed for intratumoral administration.1 2 In any case, it is clear that what best mimics a local viral infection is the virus itself. These agents have a number of pros and cons if compared with the preclinically studied repurposed vaccines. Prevaccination is probably an interesting safety feature that seems to increase efficacy or that at least does not spoil it. Another question that can only be addressed in humans is the prime-boosting effect of injecting multiple tumor lesions at different time points within the same patient. Such strategy could better address the cancer heterogeneity existing within metastatic patients while amplifying pre-existing anticancer immune responses. Also, these intratumoral virus vaccines could be of great value to trigger the antitumor immunity in a neoadjuvant setting in order to avoid postsurgery relapses. Last but not least, these commercially available and pediatric-grade anti-infectious vaccines could be of interest to treat cancers arising in infants and children, or any other rare tumor indication which is not frequent enough to benefit from registration trials of pattern recognition receptor agonists and oncolytic viruses.
Figure 1

Repurposing anti-infectious viral vaccines for intratumoral immunotherapy to turn cold tumors into hot and overcome resistance to immune checkpoint-targeted therapies.

Repurposing anti-infectious viral vaccines for intratumoral immunotherapy to turn cold tumors into hot and overcome resistance to immune checkpoint-targeted therapies.
  10 in total

Review 1.  Immunogenic cell death in cancer and infectious disease.

Authors:  Lorenzo Galluzzi; Aitziber Buqué; Oliver Kepp; Laurence Zitvogel; Guido Kroemer
Journal:  Nat Rev Immunol       Date:  2016-10-17       Impact factor: 53.106

Review 2.  Optimizing oncolytic virotherapy in cancer treatment.

Authors:  Kevin Harrington; Daniel J Freeman; Beth Kelly; James Harper; Jean-Charles Soria
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2019-07-10       Impact factor: 84.694

3.  Repurposing rotavirus vaccines for intratumoral immunotherapy can overcome resistance to immune checkpoint blockade.

Authors:  Tala Shekarian; Eva Sivado; Anne-Catherine Jallas; Stéphane Depil; Janice Kielbassa; Isabelle Janoueix-Lerosey; Gregor Hutter; Nadège Goutagny; Christophe Bergeron; Alain Viari; Sandrine Valsesia-Wittmann; Christophe Caux; Aurélien Marabelle
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2019-10-23       Impact factor: 17.956

Review 4.  Pharmacological modulation of nucleic acid sensors - therapeutic potential and persisting obstacles.

Authors:  Claire Vanpouille-Box; Jules A Hoffmann; Lorenzo Galluzzi
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2019-09-25       Impact factor: 84.694

Review 5.  Intratumoral Delivery of Immunotherapy-Act Locally, Think Globally.

Authors:  M Angela Aznar; Nicola Tinari; Antonio J Rullán; Alfonso R Sánchez-Paulete; María E Rodriguez-Ruiz; Ignacio Melero
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  2017-01-01       Impact factor: 5.422

6.  Talimogene Laherparepvec Improves Durable Response Rate in Patients With Advanced Melanoma.

Authors:  Robert H I Andtbacka; Howard L Kaufman; Frances Collichio; Thomas Amatruda; Neil Senzer; Jason Chesney; Keith A Delman; Lynn E Spitler; Igor Puzanov; Sanjiv S Agarwala; Mohammed Milhem; Lee Cranmer; Brendan Curti; Karl Lewis; Merrick Ross; Troy Guthrie; Gerald P Linette; Gregory A Daniels; Kevin Harrington; Mark R Middleton; Wilson H Miller; Jonathan S Zager; Yining Ye; Bin Yao; Ai Li; Susan Doleman; Ari VanderWalde; Jennifer Gansert; Robert S Coffin
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-05-26       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  Talimogene Laherparepvec in Combination With Ipilimumab in Previously Untreated, Unresectable Stage IIIB-IV Melanoma.

Authors:  Igor Puzanov; Mohammed M Milhem; David Minor; Omid Hamid; Ai Li; Lisa Chen; Michael Chastain; Kevin S Gorski; Abraham Anderson; Jeffrey Chou; Howard L Kaufman; Robert H I Andtbacka
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-06-13       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  Oncolytic Virotherapy Promotes Intratumoral T Cell Infiltration and Improves Anti-PD-1 Immunotherapy.

Authors:  Antoni Ribas; Reinhard Dummer; Igor Puzanov; Ari VanderWalde; Robert H I Andtbacka; Olivier Michielin; Anthony J Olszanski; Josep Malvehy; Jonathan Cebon; Eugenio Fernandez; John M Kirkwood; Thomas F Gajewski; Lisa Chen; Kevin S Gorski; Abraham A Anderson; Scott J Diede; Michael E Lassman; Jennifer Gansert; F Stephen Hodi; Georgina V Long
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2017-09-07       Impact factor: 41.582

9.  Starting the fight in the tumor: expert recommendations for the development of human intratumoral immunotherapy (HIT-IT).

Authors:  A Marabelle; R Andtbacka; K Harrington; I Melero; R Leidner; T de Baere; C Robert; P A Ascierto; J-F Baurain; M Imperiale; S Rahimian; D Tersago; E Klumper; M Hendriks; R Kumar; M Stern; K Öhrling; C Massacesi; I Tchakov; A Tse; J-Y Douillard; J Tabernero; J Haanen; J Brody
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2018-11-01       Impact factor: 32.976

10.  Repurposing the yellow fever vaccine for intratumoral immunotherapy.

Authors:  Maria Angela Aznar; Carmen Molina; Alvaro Teijeira; Inmaculada Rodriguez; Arantza Azpilikueta; Saray Garasa; Alfonso R Sanchez-Paulete; Luna Cordeiro; Iñaki Etxeberria; Maite Alvarez; Sergio Rius-Rocabert; Estanislao Nistal-Villan; Pedro Berraondo; Ignacio Melero
Journal:  EMBO Mol Med       Date:  2019-11-19       Impact factor: 12.137

  10 in total
  11 in total

1.  Tumor density is associated with response to endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle injection of cisplatin.

Authors:  C Matthew Kinsey; Raúl San José Estépar; Jason H T Bates; Bernard F Cole; George Washko; Michael Jantz; Hiren Mehta
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2020-09       Impact factor: 2.895

2.  A novel cancer vaccine for melanoma based on an approved vaccine against measles, mumps, and rubella.

Authors:  Manlio Fusciello; Erkko Ylösmäki; Sara Feola; Arttu Uoti; Beatriz Martins; Karri Aalto; Firas Hamdan; Jacopo Chiaro; Salvatore Russo; Tapani Viitala; Vincenzo Cerullo
Journal:  Mol Ther Oncolytics       Date:  2022-04-19       Impact factor: 6.311

Review 3.  Repurposing Infectious Diseases Vaccines Against Cancer.

Authors:  Liese Vandeborne; Pan Pantziarka; An M T Van Nuffel; Gauthier Bouche
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-05-13       Impact factor: 6.244

Review 4.  Intratumoural administration and tumour tissue targeting of cancer immunotherapies.

Authors:  Ignacio Melero; Eduardo Castanon; Maite Alvarez; Stephane Champiat; Aurelien Marabelle
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2021-05-18       Impact factor: 66.675

Review 5.  A combination of PD‑1/PD‑L1 inhibitors: The prospect of overcoming the weakness of tumor immunotherapy (Review).

Authors:  Xianbin Kong; Peng Lu; Chuanxin Liu; Yuzhu Guo; Yuying Yang; Yingying Peng; Fangyuan Wang; Zhichao Bo; Xiaoxin Dou; Haoyang Shi; Jingyan Meng
Journal:  Mol Med Rep       Date:  2021-03-24       Impact factor: 2.952

Review 6.  Advances in immunotherapy for hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Bruno Sangro; Pablo Sarobe; Sandra Hervás-Stubbs; Ignacio Melero
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2021-04-13       Impact factor: 73.082

Review 7.  Repurposing CD8+ T cell immunity against SARS-CoV-2 for cancer immunotherapy: a positive aspect of the COVID-19 pandemic?

Authors:  Shashi Gujar; Jonathan G Pol; Youra Kim; Guido Kroemer
Journal:  Oncoimmunology       Date:  2020-07-16       Impact factor: 8.110

Review 8.  Oncolytic Viruses and Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: Preclinical Developments to Clinical Trials.

Authors:  June Kyu Hwang; JinWoo Hong; Chae-Ok Yun
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-11-16       Impact factor: 5.923

9.  Intratumoral expression of interleukin 23 variants using oncolytic vaccinia virus elicit potent antitumor effects on multiple tumor models via tumor microenvironment modulation.

Authors:  Lingjuan Chen; Hongqi Chen; Junjie Ye; Yan Ge; Haiyan Wang; Enyong Dai; Jinghua Ren; Weilin Liu; Congrong Ma; Songguang Ju; Z Sheng Guo; Zuqiang Liu; David L Bartlett
Journal:  Theranostics       Date:  2021-05-03       Impact factor: 11.556

Review 10.  Combinatorial Approaches for Cancer Treatment Using Oncolytic Viruses: Projecting the Perspectives through Clinical Trials Outcomes.

Authors:  Alexander Malogolovkin; Nizami Gasanov; Alexander Egorov; Marianna Weener; Roman Ivanov; Alexander Karabelsky
Journal:  Viruses       Date:  2021-06-29       Impact factor: 5.048

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.