Literature DB >> 34555822

A novel technique for accurate electrode placement over cortical targets for transcranial electrical stimulation (tES) clinical trials.

Mayank Jog1, Cole Anderson1, Elizabeth Kim1, Avery Garrett1, Antoni Kubicki1, Sara Gonzalez1, Kay Jann2, Marco Iacoboni1, Roger Woods1, Danny Jj Wang2, Katherine L Narr1.   

Abstract

Objective. We present an easy-to-implement technique for accurate electrode placement over repeated transcranial electrical stimulation (tES) sessions across participants and time. tES is an emerging, non-invasive neuromodulation technique that delivers electrical stimulation using scalp electrodes.Approach.The tES electrode placement technique was developed during an exploratory clinical trial aimed at targeting a specific MNI-atlas cortical coordinate inN= 59 depressed participants (32 F, mean age: 31.1 ± 8.3 SD). Each participant completed 12 sessions of active or sham stimulation, administered using high-definition (HD) or conventional sized electrode montages placed according to the proposed technique. Neuronavigation data measuring the distances between the identified and the intended stimulation site, simulations, and cerebral blood flow (CBF) data at baseline and post-treatment were acquired to evaluate the targeting characteristics of the proposed technique.Main results.Neuronavigation measurements indicate accurate electrode placement to within 1 cm of the stimulation target on average across repeated sessions. Simulations predict that these placement characteristics result in minimal electric field differences at the stimulation target (>0.90 correlation, and <10% change in the modal electric field and targeted volume). Additionally, significant changes in %CBF (relative to baseline) under the stimulation target in the active stimulation group relative to sham confirmed that the proposed placement technique introduces minimal bias in the spatial location of the cortical coordinate ultimately targeted. Finally, we show proof of concept that the proposed technique provides similar accuracy of electrode placement at other cortical targets.Significance.For voxel-level cortical targets, existing techniques based on cranial landmarks are suboptimal. Our results show that the proposed electrode placement approach provides high consistency for the accurate targeting of such specific cortical regions. Overall, the proposed technique now enables the accurate targeting of locations not accessible with the existing 10-20 system such as scalp-projections of clinically-relevant cortical coordinates identified by brain mapping studies. Clinical trial ID: NCT03556124.
© 2021 IOP Publishing Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cortical targeting; electrode placement; neuromodulation; neuronavigation; transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS); transcranial electrical stimulation (tES)

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34555822      PMCID: PMC8594950          DOI: 10.1088/1741-2552/ac297d

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neural Eng        ISSN: 1741-2552            Impact factor:   5.043


  46 in total

1.  Using the international 10-20 EEG system for positioning of transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  Uwe Herwig; Peyman Satrapi; Carlos Schönfeldt-Lecuona
Journal:  Brain Topogr       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 3.020

2.  Resting-state networks link invasive and noninvasive brain stimulation across diverse psychiatric and neurological diseases.

Authors:  Michael D Fox; Randy L Buckner; Hesheng Liu; M Mallar Chakravarty; Andres M Lozano; Alvaro Pascual-Leone
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-09-29       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Effects of Electrode Drift in Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation.

Authors:  Adam J Woods; Vaughn Bryant; Daniela Sacchetti; Felix Gervits; Roy Hamilton
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2014-12-24       Impact factor: 8.955

4.  Increased left prefrontal brain perfusion after MRI compatible tDCS attenuates momentary ruminative self-referential thoughts.

Authors:  Chris Baeken; Jonathan Remue; Marie-Anne Vanderhasselt; Andre R Brunoni; Sara De Witte; Romain Duprat; Ernst H W Koster; Rudi De Raedt; Guo-Rong Wu
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2017-09-06       Impact factor: 8.955

Review 5.  The application of tDCS for the treatment of psychiatric diseases.

Authors:  Min-Fang Kuo; Po-See Chen; Michael A Nitsche
Journal:  Int Rev Psychiatry       Date:  2017-02-16

6.  Pharmacological modulation of cortical excitability shifts induced by transcranial direct current stimulation in humans.

Authors:  M A Nitsche; K Fricke; U Henschke; A Schlitterlau; D Liebetanz; N Lang; S Henning; F Tergau; W Paulus
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2003-08-29       Impact factor: 5.182

7.  Extending the Human Connectome Project across ages: Imaging protocols for the Lifespan Development and Aging projects.

Authors:  Michael P Harms; Leah H Somerville; Beau M Ances; Jesper Andersson; Deanna M Barch; Matteo Bastiani; Susan Y Bookheimer; Timothy B Brown; Randy L Buckner; Gregory C Burgess; Timothy S Coalson; Michael A Chappell; Mirella Dapretto; Gwenaëlle Douaud; Bruce Fischl; Matthew F Glasser; Douglas N Greve; Cynthia Hodge; Keith W Jamison; Saad Jbabdi; Sridhar Kandala; Xiufeng Li; Ross W Mair; Silvia Mangia; Daniel Marcus; Daniele Mascali; Steen Moeller; Thomas E Nichols; Emma C Robinson; David H Salat; Stephen M Smith; Stamatios N Sotiropoulos; Melissa Terpstra; Kathleen M Thomas; M Dylan Tisdall; Kamil Ugurbil; Andre van der Kouwe; Roger P Woods; Lilla Zöllei; David C Van Essen; Essa Yacoub
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2018-09-24       Impact factor: 6.556

8.  A review of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) for the individualized treatment of depressive symptoms.

Authors:  Mayank V Jog; Danny J J Wang; Katherine L Narr
Journal:  Pers Med Psychiatry       Date:  2019-05-07

Review 9.  The contribution of interindividual factors to variability of response in transcranial direct current stimulation studies.

Authors:  Lucia M Li; Kazumasa Uehara; Takashi Hanakawa
Journal:  Front Cell Neurosci       Date:  2015-05-12       Impact factor: 5.505

10.  Electrode Placement in Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation-How Reliable Is the Determination of C3/C4?

Authors:  Tonya L Rich; Bernadette T Gillick
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2019-03-22
View more
  1 in total

1.  Differences in electric field strength between clinical and non-clinical populations induced by prefrontal tDCS: A cross-diagnostic, individual MRI-based modeling study.

Authors:  Yuki Mizutani-Tiebel; Shun Takahashi; Temmuz Karali; Eva Mezger; Lucia Bulubas; Irina Papazova; Esther Dechantsreiter; Sophia Stoecklein; Boris Papazov; Axel Thielscher; Frank Padberg; Daniel Keeser
Journal:  Neuroimage Clin       Date:  2022-04-16       Impact factor: 4.891

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.