Literature DB >> 32918698

Birth cohort differences in cognitive performance in 75- and 80-year-olds: a comparison of two cohorts over 28 years.

Matti Munukka1, Kaisa Koivunen2, Mikaela von Bonsdorff2, Sarianna Sipilä2, Erja Portegijs2, Isto Ruoppila2, Taina Rantanen2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate cohort differences in cognitive performance in older men and women born and assessed 28 years apart.
METHODS: Data in this study were drawn from two age-homogeneous cohorts measured in the same laboratory using the same standardized cognitive performance tests. Participants in the first cohort were born in 1910 and 1914 and assessed in 1989-1990 (Evergreen project, n = 500). Participants in the second cohort were born in 1938 or 1939 and 1942 or 1943 and assessed in 2017-2018 (Evergreen II, n = 726). Participants in both cohorts were assessed at age 75 and 80 years and were recruited from the population register. Cognitive performance was measured using the Digit Span test from the Wechsler Memory Scale (WMS), Digit Symbol test from the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale (WAIS) and phonemic Verbal Fluency test from the Schaie-Thurstone Adult Mental Abilities Test. Reaction time assessing motor and mental responses was measured with a simple finger movement task, followed by a complex finger movement task. T-tests were used to study cohort differences and linear regression models to study possible factors underlying differences.
RESULTS: We found statistically significant cohort differences in all the cognitive performance tests, except for the digit span test and simple movement task in men, the later-born cohort performing better in all the measured outcomes.
CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study provide strong evidence that cognitive performance is better in more recent cohorts of older people compared to their counterparts measured 28 years earlier.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cognitive performance; Digit span test; Digit symbol test; Reaction time; Verbal fluency test

Year:  2020        PMID: 32918698     DOI: 10.1007/s40520-020-01702-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aging Clin Exp Res        ISSN: 1594-0667            Impact factor:   3.636


  25 in total

1.  Cohort differences in cognitive aging and terminal decline in the Seattle Longitudinal Study.

Authors:  Denis Gerstorf; Nilam Ram; Christiane Hoppmann; Sherry L Willis; K Warner Schaie
Journal:  Dev Psychol       Date:  2011-07

2.  The Flynn effect and memory function.

Authors:  Sallie Baxendale
Journal:  J Clin Exp Neuropsychol       Date:  2010-01-29       Impact factor: 2.475

3.  Not your parents' test scores: cohort reduces psychometric aging effects.

Authors:  Elizabeth M Zelinski; Robert F Kennison
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2007-09

4.  The WAIS-III and WAIS-IV: Daubert motions favor the certainly false over the approximately true.

Authors:  James R Flynn
Journal:  Appl Neuropsychol       Date:  2009

5.  Flynn effects on sub-factors of episodic and semantic memory: parallel gains over time and the same set of determining factors.

Authors:  Michael Rönnlund; Lars-Göran Nilsson
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2008-11-13       Impact factor: 3.139

6.  Cohort effects in age-associated cognitive trajectories.

Authors:  Hiroko H Dodge; Jian Zhu; Ching-Wen Lee; Chung-Chou Ho Chang; Mary Ganguli
Journal:  J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci       Date:  2013-11-23       Impact factor: 6.053

7.  Secular changes in late-life cognition and well-being: Towards a long bright future with a short brisk ending?

Authors:  Denis Gerstorf; Gizem Hülür; Johanna Drewelies; Peter Eibich; Sandra Duezel; Ilja Demuth; Paolo Ghisletta; Elisabeth Steinhagen-Thiessen; Gert G Wagner; Ulman Lindenberger
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2015-03-23

8.  Better Cognition in New Birth Cohorts of 70 Year Olds, But Greater Decline Thereafter.

Authors:  Valgeir Thorvaldsson; Peter Karlsson; Johan Skoog; Ingmar Skoog; Boo Johansson
Journal:  J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 4.077

9.  Birth cohort differences in fluid cognition in old age: comparisons of trends in levels and change trajectories over 30 years in three population-based samples.

Authors:  Peter Karlsson; Valgeir Thorvaldsson; Ingmar Skoog; Pia Gudmundsson; Boo Johansson
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2015-01-19

10.  Cohort Differences in Cognitive Aging in the Longitudinal Aging Study Amsterdam.

Authors:  Anamaria Brailean; Martijn Huisman; Martin Prince; A Matthew Prina; Dorly J H Deeg; Hannie Comijs
Journal:  J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci       Date:  2018-09-20       Impact factor: 4.077

View more
  3 in total

1.  Improved Cognitive Function in the Tromsø Study in Norway From 2001 to 2016.

Authors:  Bente Johnsen; Bjørn Heine Strand; Ieva Martinaityte; Ellisiv B Mathiesen; Henrik Schirmer
Journal:  Neurol Clin Pract       Date:  2021-12

2.  Adult motor neuron disease death rates in Finland 1998-2019.

Authors:  Jussi O T Sipilä; Manu Jokela
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2022-10-03       Impact factor: 6.682

3.  Age Is Only a Number Also in Hyperacute Stroke Care-But Not an Irrelevant One.

Authors:  Jussi O T Sipilä
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-08-13       Impact factor: 4.964

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.