Literature DB >> 17874953

Not your parents' test scores: cohort reduces psychometric aging effects.

Elizabeth M Zelinski1, Robert F Kennison.   

Abstract

Increases over birth cohorts in psychometric abilities may impact effects of aging. Data from 2 cohorts of the Long Beach Longitudinal Study, matched on age but tested 16 years apart, were modeled over ages 55-87 to test the hypothesis that the more fluid abilities of reasoning, list and text recall, and space would show larger cohort differences than vocabulary. This hypothesis was confirmed. At age 74, average performance estimates for people from the more recently born cohort were equivalent to those of people from the older cohort when they were up to 15 years younger. This finding suggests that older adults may perform like much younger ones from the previous generation on fluid measures, indicating higher levels of abilities than expected. This result could have major implications for the expected productivity of an aging workforce as well as for the quality of life of future generations. However, cohort improvements did not mitigate age declines. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2007 APA, all rights reserved).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17874953      PMCID: PMC4169292          DOI: 10.1037/0882-7974.22.3.546

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Aging        ISSN: 0882-7974


  30 in total

1.  The unity and diversity of executive functions and their contributions to complex "Frontal Lobe" tasks: a latent variable analysis.

Authors:  A Miyake; N P Friedman; M J Emerson; A H Witzki; A Howerter; T D Wager
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 2.  Heritability estimates versus large environmental effects: the IQ paradox resolved.

Authors:  W T Dickens; J R Flynn
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 8.934

3.  The IQ paradox: resolved? Still an open question.

Authors:  John C Loehlin
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 8.934

Review 4.  Assessing psychological change in adulthood: an overview of methodological issues.

Authors:  Christopher Hertzog; John R Nesselroade
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2003-12

5.  Sixteen-year longitudinal and time lag changes in memory and cognition in older adults.

Authors:  E M Zelinski; K P Burnight
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  1997-09

6.  The relationship between prior functioning on cognitive and personality dimensions and subject attrition in longitudinal research.

Authors:  T M Cooney; K W Schaie; S L Willis
Journal:  J Gerontol       Date:  1988-01

7.  National estimates of the quantity and cost of informal caregiving for the elderly with dementia.

Authors:  K M Langa; M E Chernew; M U Kabeto; A R Herzog; M B Ofstedal; R J Willis; R B Wallace; L M Mucha; W L Straus; A M Fendrick
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 5.128

8.  An item analysis which takes individual differences into account.

Authors:  G Rasch
Journal:  Br J Math Stat Psychol       Date:  1966-05       Impact factor: 3.380

9.  Age differences in fluid and crystallized intelligence.

Authors:  J L Horn; R B Cattell
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  1967

10.  Adult age differences in multiple cognitive functions: differentiation, dedifferentiation, or process-specific change?

Authors:  Elizabeth M Zelinski; Kayan L Lewis
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2003-12
View more
  10 in total

1.  Cohort differences in cognitive aging and terminal decline in the Seattle Longitudinal Study.

Authors:  Denis Gerstorf; Nilam Ram; Christiane Hoppmann; Sherry L Willis; K Warner Schaie
Journal:  Dev Psychol       Date:  2011-07

2.  List and text recall differ in their predictors: replication over samples and time.

Authors:  Kayan L Lewis; Elizabeth M Zelinski
Journal:  J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci       Date:  2010-05-24       Impact factor: 4.077

3.  Midlife memory improvement predicts preservation of hippocampal volume in old age.

Authors:  Paul R Borghesani; Kurt E Weaver; Elizabeth H Aylward; Anne L Richards; Tara M Madhyastha; Ali R Kahn; Olivia Liang; Rachel L Ellenbogen; M Faisal Beg; K Warner Schaie; Sherry L Willis
Journal:  Neurobiol Aging       Date:  2010-11-12       Impact factor: 4.673

4.  How Interventions Might Improve Cognition in Healthy Older Adults.

Authors:  Elizabeth M Zelinski
Journal:  Int J Gaming Comput Mediat Simul       Date:  2013

5.  Cohorts based on decade of death: no evidence for secular trends favoring later cohorts in cognitive aging and terminal decline in the AHEAD study.

Authors:  Gizem Hülür; Frank J Infurna; Nilam Ram; Denis Gerstorf
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2012-10-08

6.  The association between higher order abilities, processing speed, and age are variably mediated by white matter integrity during typical aging.

Authors:  Paul R Borghesani; Tara M Madhyastha; Elizabeth H Aylward; Maya A Reiter; Bruce R Swarny; K Warner Schaie; Sherry L Willis
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2013-03-16       Impact factor: 3.139

7.  Secular trends in cognitive trajectories of diverse older adults.

Authors:  Jet M J Vonk; Miguel Arce Rentería; Justina F Avila; Nicole Schupf; James M Noble; Richard Mayeux; Adam M Brickman; Jennifer J Manly
Journal:  Alzheimers Dement       Date:  2019-10-28       Impact factor: 21.566

8.  Confirming the cognition of rising scores: Fox and Mitchum (2013) predicts violations of measurement invariance in series completion between age-matched cohorts.

Authors:  Mark C Fox; Ainsley L Mitchum
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-05-07       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Cohort Differences in Cognitive Aging in the Longitudinal Aging Study Amsterdam.

Authors:  Anamaria Brailean; Martijn Huisman; Martin Prince; A Matthew Prina; Dorly J H Deeg; Hannie Comijs
Journal:  J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci       Date:  2018-09-20       Impact factor: 4.077

10.  Birth cohort differences in cognitive performance in 75- and 80-year-olds: a comparison of two cohorts over 28 years.

Authors:  Matti Munukka; Kaisa Koivunen; Mikaela von Bonsdorff; Sarianna Sipilä; Erja Portegijs; Isto Ruoppila; Taina Rantanen
Journal:  Aging Clin Exp Res       Date:  2020-09-12       Impact factor: 3.636

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.