| Literature DB >> 32910258 |
P J Schuler1,2, F Boehm3,4, L R Schild3,4, J Greve3,4, T K Hoffmann3,4.
Abstract
Robot-assisted surgery (RAS) has already been approved for several clinical applications in head and neck surgery. In some Anglo-American regions, RAS is currently the common standard for treatment of oropharyngeal diseases. Systematic randomized studies comparing established surgical procedures with RAS in a large number of patients are unavailable so far. Experimental publications rather describe how to reach poorly accessible anatomical regions using RAS, or represent feasibility studies on the use of transoral robotic surgery (TORS) in established surgical operations. With general application of RAS in clinical practice, the question of financial reimbursement arises. Furthermore, the technical applications currently on the market still require some specific improvements for routine use in head and neck surgery.Entities:
Keywords: Computer-assisted surgery; Head and neck neoplasms; Health care costs; Robotic surgical procedures; Treatment outcome
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 32910258 DOI: 10.1007/s00106-020-00934-w
Source DB: PubMed Journal: HNO ISSN: 0017-6192 Impact factor: 1.284