Literature DB >> 30826917

A cost effective custom dental guard for transoral robotic surgery.

Daniel Benito1, Margaret C Michel2, Punam G Thakkar1, Joseph F Goodman1, Nader Sadeghi3, Arjun S Joshi1.   

Abstract

There has been an increasing use of transoral robotic surgery (TORS) as studies have demonstrated its effectiveness for treating a variety of conditions. Postoperative complications of TORS include hemorrhage, tooth injury, dehydration, aspiration pneumonia, and prolonged percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tube dependency. Dental injury has not been adequately discussed although it has been reported to be a common complication in multiple studies, with repair costs ranging from $700 to $3000 and average time spent to address the injury estimated to be 2.6 h. The incidence of this injury is likely due to the standard dental guard, which is not customizable to the patient's teeth, therefore, not optimal for dental protection. Many alternative dental guards have been proposed to reduce the rate of dental injury. However, the previously presented alternatives are high cost, not time efficient, or have the potential for molding error rendering them less effective. We propose a guard that is cheap, time efficient, and effective in preventing dental injury. A retrospective study of 124 patients who underwent TORS over a period of 6 years with the proposed dental guard was conducted. No dental complications were observed in any of these cases. A cost analysis showed that this guard saved $4526.64 for our relatively small patient cohort. This guard can save money, time, and stress for both the patient and the surgeon, as well as reduce the number and severity of medico-legal claims related to perioperative dental injury.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cost effective; Custom dental guard; Dental injury; Transoral robotic surgery

Year:  2019        PMID: 30826917     DOI: 10.1007/s11701-019-00942-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Robot Surg        ISSN: 1863-2483


  15 in total

1.  Cost-effective dental protection during rigid endoscopy.

Authors:  Mark Domanski; Patty Lee; Nader Sadeghi
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 3.325

2.  'Boil and Bite' mouth guards for direct laryngoscopy.

Authors:  G J Crossland; A G Pfleiderer
Journal:  Clin Otolaryngol       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 2.597

3.  Surgeon experience and complications with Transoral Robotic Surgery (TORS).

Authors:  Stanley H Chia; Neil D Gross; Jeremy D Richmon
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2013-09-06       Impact factor: 3.497

4.  The use of custom-made dental splints for robotic and rigid endoscopic surgery of the upper aerodigestive tract.

Authors:  K M Ubayasiri; W S Cho; P Smith; R Thorpe; M-S Mansuri; D Laugharne; S Mortimore
Journal:  Clin Otolaryngol       Date:  2017-12-18       Impact factor: 2.597

5.  Transoral robotic surgery (TORS) for base of tongue neoplasms.

Authors:  Bert W O'Malley; Gregory S Weinstein; Wendy Snyder; Neil G Hockstein
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 3.325

6.  Transoral robotic surgery: a multicenter study to assess feasibility, safety, and surgical margins.

Authors:  Gregory S Weinstein; Bert W O'Malley; J Scott Magnuson; William R Carroll; Kerry D Olsen; Lixia Daio; Eric J Moore; F Christopher Holsinger
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2012-07-02       Impact factor: 3.325

7.  Dental injury after conventional direct laryngoscopy: a prospective observational study.

Authors:  J Mourão; J Neto; C Luís; C Moreno; J Barbosa; J Carvalho; J Tavares
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 6.955

8.  Transoral robotic surgery for oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma: a prospective study of feasibility and functional outcomes.

Authors:  Eric J Moore; Kerry D Olsen; Jan L Kasperbauer
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 3.325

9.  Functional and quality-of-life outcomes of transoral robotic surgery for carcinoma of unknown primary.

Authors:  Kasim Durmus; Hafiz S Patwa; Hamza N Gokozan; Cuneyt Kucur; Theodoros N Teknos; Amit Agrawal; Matthew O Old; Enver Ozer
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2014-05-02       Impact factor: 3.325

10.  Dental considerations in anaesthesia.

Authors:  Vaibhav Sahni
Journal:  JRSM Open       Date:  2016-12-01
View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  [Robot-assisted head and neck surgery].

Authors:  P J Schuler; F Boehm; L R Schild; J Greve; T K Hoffmann
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2021-02       Impact factor: 1.284

Review 2.  Current Advances in Robotics for Head and Neck Surgery-A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Felix Boehm; Rene Graesslin; Marie-Nicole Theodoraki; Leon Schild; Jens Greve; Thomas K Hoffmann; Patrick J Schuler
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-03-19       Impact factor: 6.639

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.