Literature DB >> 30051531

Oncologic outcomes with transoral robotic surgery for supraglottic squamous cell carcinoma: Results of the French Robotic Surgery Group of GETTEC.

Marianne Doazan1, Stéphane Hans2, Sylvain Morinière3, Benjamin Lallemant4, Sébastien Vergez5, Karine Aubry6, Erwan De Monès7, Florent Espitalier8, Franck Jegoux9, Pierre Pradat10, Philippe Céruse1,11.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Transoral robotic surgery (TORS) is an option to treat supraglottic squamous cell carcinomas (SCCs). We studied the oncologic outcomes after TORS for supraglottic laryngectomy (SGL).
METHODS: We conducted a multicenter observational study of SGL using TORS for patients with supraglottic SCC with at least 2 years of follow-up.
RESULTS: One hundred twenty-two patients were included in our study. Mean follow-up was 42.8 months. Local control was 94.3% at 2 years and 90.2% at 5 years. Overall survival and disease-free survival were 86.9% and 95.1% at 2 years, and 78.7% and 94.3% at 5 years, respectively. Sixty-three patients (51.6%) received adjuvant radiotherapy. For 16 of them, this was due to close or positive margins.
CONCLUSION: Local control rate after TORS SGL was at least equivalent to what has been described in the literature for open or transoral laser surgery, or with radiotherapy. Using TORS seems to be an effective therapeutic treatment of early-stage and intermediate-stage supraglottic SCCs.
© 2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  da Vinci robotic system; head and neck cancer; oncologic outcomes; supraglottic laryngectomy; transoral robotic surgery

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30051531     DOI: 10.1002/hed.25199

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Head Neck        ISSN: 1043-3074            Impact factor:   3.147


  8 in total

1.  [Robotics in otorhinolaryngology, head and neck surgery].

Authors:  F Böhm; J Greve; R Riepl; T K Hoffmann; P J Schuler
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2021-07-16       Impact factor: 1.284

Review 2.  [Robot-assisted head and neck surgery].

Authors:  P J Schuler; F Boehm; L R Schild; J Greve; T K Hoffmann
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2021-02       Impact factor: 1.284

Review 3.  Transoral robotic cordectomy for glottic carcinoma: a rapid review.

Authors:  Jérôme R Lechien; Robin Baudouin; Marta P Circiu; Carlos M Chiesa-Estomba; Lise Crevier-Buchman; Stephane Hans
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2022-06-22       Impact factor: 3.236

4.  Transoral robotic surgery vs open surgery in head and neck cancer. A systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  À Roselló; R Albuquerque; X Roselló-Llabrés; A Marí-Roig; A Estrugo-Devesa; J López-López
Journal:  Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal       Date:  2020-09-01

5.  Comparison of Survival After Transoral Robotic Surgery vs Nonrobotic Surgery in Patients With Early-Stage Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

Authors:  Anthony T Nguyen; Michael Luu; Jon Mallen-St Clair; Alain C Mita; Kevin S Scher; Diana J Lu; Stephen L Shiao; Allen S Ho; Zachary S Zumsteg
Journal:  JAMA Oncol       Date:  2020-10-01       Impact factor: 31.777

Review 6.  Current Role of Surgery in the Management of Oropharyngeal Cancer.

Authors:  Wojciech Golusiński; Ewelina Golusińska-Kardach
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2019-05-24       Impact factor: 6.244

7.  The robotic-assisted extended "Sistrunk" approach for tumors of the upper aerodigestive tract with limited transoral access: First description of oncological and functional outcomes.

Authors:  Christian Simon; Avinash Beharry; Vinidh Paleri; Pascaline Dübi; Karma Lambercy; F Christopher Holsinger; Jelena Todic
Journal:  Head Neck       Date:  2022-06-02       Impact factor: 3.821

Review 8.  Current Advances in Robotics for Head and Neck Surgery-A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Felix Boehm; Rene Graesslin; Marie-Nicole Theodoraki; Leon Schild; Jens Greve; Thomas K Hoffmann; Patrick J Schuler
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-03-19       Impact factor: 6.639

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.