Literature DB >> 32909087

Visual selection and response selection without effector selection in tasks with circular arrays.

Robert W Proctor1, Alice F Healy2,3.   

Abstract

Charles Eriksen and colleagues conducted influential visual-search experiments with circular arrays for which the responses were either vocal naming or unimanual left-right switch movements. These methods have the advantages of the stimuli being equidistant from a centered fixation point and allowing study of visual selection and response selection when effector selection is not required, as in the more typical case in which responses are key presses of distinct fingers. Other researchers have used similar spatial arrangements, but with aimed movements of the limb or of a mouse-controlled cursor to study effects of stimulus identification, visual search, spatial stimulus-response compatibility, response-effect compatibility, and practice/transfer in isolation and jointly. We systematically review studies in these areas that include visual selection and response selection and execution, and examine implications of their results for the role of effector selection. Also, we illustrate that as one moves from simpler to more complex tasks, the results are consistent with a basic information-processing framework in which stimulus identification and selection of a target response location are distinct from selecting, planning, and moving an effector to the targeted location.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Attention: Selective; Goal-directed movements; Perception and Action; Response-effect compatibility; Spatial information processing; Stimulus-response compatibility; Visual search

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 32909087     DOI: 10.3758/s13414-020-02116-w

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 1943-3921            Impact factor:   2.199


  26 in total

1.  Operationism and the concept of perception.

Authors:  W R GARNER; H W HAKE; C W ERIKSEN
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1956-05       Impact factor: 8.934

2.  S-R compatibility: correspondence among paired elements within stimulus and response codes.

Authors:  P M FITTS; R L DEININGER
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1954-12

3.  The information capacity of the human motor system in controlling the amplitude of movement.

Authors:  P M FITTS
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1954-06

4.  Stimulus information as a determinant of reaction time.

Authors:  R HYMAN
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1953-03

5.  S-R compatibility: spatial characteristics of stimulus and response codes.

Authors:  P M FITTS; C M SEEGER
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1953-09

6.  Aiming error under transformed spatial mappings suggests a structure for visual-motor maps.

Authors:  H A Cunningham
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1989-08       Impact factor: 3.332

7.  Choice and stimulus-response compatibility affect duration of response selection.

Authors:  P Dassonville; S M Lewis; H E Foster; J Ashe
Journal:  Brain Res Cogn Brain Res       Date:  1999-01

8.  Time course of motor affordances evoked by pictured objects and words.

Authors:  Daniel N Bub; Michael E J Masson; Ragav Kumar
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2017-04-27       Impact factor: 3.332

9.  Pre- and poststimulus activation of response channels: a psychophysiological analysis.

Authors:  G Gratton; M G Coles; E J Sirevaag; C W Eriksen; E Donchin
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1988-08       Impact factor: 3.332

10.  Specificity effects in training and transfer of speeded responses.

Authors:  Alice F Healy; Erica L Wohldmann; Evan M Sutton; Lyle E Bourne
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 3.051

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.