Literature DB >> 32909075

Virtual screening of potentially endocrine-disrupting chemicals against nuclear receptors and its application to identify PPARγ-bound fatty acids.

Chaitanya K Jaladanki1,2, Yang He3, Li Na Zhao1, Sebastian Maurer-Stroh1,2, Lit-Hsin Loo1,2, Haiwei Song4, Hao Fan5.   

Abstract

Nuclear receptors (NRs) are key regulators of energy homeostasis, body development, and sexual reproduction. Xenobiotics binding to NRs may disrupt natural hormonal systems and induce undesired adverse effects in the body. However, many chemicals of concerns have limited or no experimental data on their potential or lack-of-potential endocrine-disrupting effects. Here, we propose a virtual screening method based on molecular docking for predicting potential endocrine-disrupting chemicals (EDCs) that bind to NRs. For 12 NRs, we systematically analyzed how multiple crystal structures can be used to distinguish actives and inactives found in previous high-throughput experiments. Our method is based on (i) consensus docking scores from multiple structures at a single functional state (agonist-bound or antagonist-bound), (ii) multiple functional states (agonist-bound and antagonist-bound), and (iii) multiple pockets (orthosteric site and alternative sites) of these NRs. We found that the consensus enrichment from multiple structures is better than or comparable to the best enrichment from a single structure. The discriminating power of this consensus strategy was further enhanced by a chemical similarity-weighted scoring scheme, yielding better or comparable enrichment for all studied NRs. Applying this optimized method, we screened 252 fatty acids against peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPARγ) and successfully identified 3 previously unknown fatty acids with Kd = 100-250 μM including two furan fatty acids: furannonanoic acid (FNA) and furanundecanoic acid (FUA), and one cyclopropane fatty acid: phytomonic acid (PTA). These results suggested that the proposed method can be used to rapidly screen and prioritize potential EDCs for further experimental evaluations.

Entities:  

Keywords:  EDC; Furan fatty acid; In silico toxicity prediction; Nuclear receptors; ToxCast; Virtual screening

Year:  2020        PMID: 32909075     DOI: 10.1007/s00204-020-02897-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Toxicol        ISSN: 0340-5761            Impact factor:   5.153


  88 in total

Review 1.  Protein flexibility is an important component of structure-based drug discovery.

Authors:  Heather A Carlson
Journal:  Curr Pharm Des       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 3.116

Review 2.  Nuclear receptor structure: implications for function.

Authors:  David L Bain; Aaron F Heneghan; Keith D Connaghan-Jones; Michael T Miura
Journal:  Annu Rev Physiol       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 19.318

3.  Association of the Pro12Ala variant in the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma2 gene with obesity in two Caucasian populations.

Authors:  B A Beamer; C J Yen; R E Andersen; D Muller; D Elahi; L J Cheskin; R Andres; J Roth; A R Shuldiner
Journal:  Diabetes       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 9.461

4.  Dominant negative mutations in human PPARgamma associated with severe insulin resistance, diabetes mellitus and hypertension.

Authors:  I Barroso; M Gurnell; V E Crowley; M Agostini; J W Schwabe; M A Soos; G L Maslen; T D Williams; H Lewis; A J Schafer; V K Chatterjee; S O'Rahilly
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1999 Dec 23-30       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Structure- and Ligand-Based Virtual Screening on DUD-E+: Performance Dependence on Approximations to the Binding Pocket.

Authors:  Ann E Cleves; Ajay N Jain
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2020-04-21       Impact factor: 4.956

6.  Intra-domain communication between the N-terminal and DNA-binding domains of the androgen receptor: modulation of androgen response element DNA binding.

Authors:  Jacqueline Brodie; Iain J McEwan
Journal:  J Mol Endocrinol       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 5.098

7.  Detection of lactobacillic acid in low erucic rapeseed oil--A note of caution when quantifying cyclic fatty acid monomers in vegetable oils.

Authors:  Olivier Berdeaux; Stéphane Gregoire; Cindie Fournier; William W Christie; Pierre Lambelet; Jean-Louis Sébédio
Journal:  Chem Phys Lipids       Date:  2010-07-21       Impact factor: 3.329

8.  Polyunsaturated fatty acids: From diet to binding to ppars and other nuclear receptors.

Authors:  A Bordoni; M Di Nunzio; F Danesi; P L Biagi
Journal:  Genes Nutr       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 5.523

9.  Target flexibility: an emerging consideration in drug discovery and design.

Authors:  Pietro Cozzini; Glen E Kellogg; Francesca Spyrakis; Donald J Abraham; Gabriele Costantino; Andrew Emerson; Francesca Fanelli; Holger Gohlke; Leslie A Kuhn; Garrett M Morris; Modesto Orozco; Thelma A Pertinhez; Menico Rizzi; Christoph A Sotriffer
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2008-09-12       Impact factor: 7.446

10.  An overview on the presence of cyclopropane fatty acids in milk and dairy products.

Authors:  Augusta Caligiani; Angela Marseglia; Gerardo Palla
Journal:  J Agric Food Chem       Date:  2014-07-24       Impact factor: 5.279

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  The new kids on the block: Emerging obesogens.

Authors:  Raquel Chamorro-Garcia; Almudena Veiga-Lopez
Journal:  Adv Pharmacol       Date:  2021-07-08

2.  Predicting the binding of small molecules to nuclear receptors using machine learning.

Authors:  Azhagiya Singam Ettayapuram Ramaprasad; Martyn T Smith; David McCoy; Alan E Hubbard; Michele A La Merrill; Kathleen A Durkin
Journal:  Brief Bioinform       Date:  2022-05-13       Impact factor: 13.994

3.  Structure-based virtual screening of CYP1A1 inhibitors: towards rapid tier-one assessment of potential developmental toxicants.

Authors:  Janice Jia Ni Goh; Julian Behn; Cheng-Shoong Chong; Guorui Zhong; Sebastian Maurer-Stroh; Hao Fan; Lit-Hsin Loo
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2021-06-28       Impact factor: 5.153

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.