| Literature DB >> 32904265 |
Yoichi Yoshida1,2,3, Xiao-Meng Zhang2, Hao Wang2,4, Toshio Machida5,6, Seiichiro Mine1,5,7, Eiichi Kobayashi1,3, Akihiko Adachi1,3, Tomoo Matsutani1,3, Ikuo Kamitsukasa8,9, Takeshi Wada10, Akiyo Aotsuka10, Katsuro Iwase2, Go Tomiyoshi2,11, Rika Nakamura2,11, Natsuko Shinmen2,11, Hideyuki Kuroda11, Hirotaka Takizawa12, Koichi Kashiwado13, Hideo Shin14, Yuichi Akaogi15, Junichiro Shimada15, Eiichiro Nishi16,17, Mikiko Ohno16,17, Minoru Takemoto18,19, Koutaro Yokote18, Kenichiro Kitamura20, Yasuo Iwadate1,3, Takaki Hiwasa1,2,3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Serum antibody markers have been increasingly identified not only for cancer and autoimmune diseases but also for atherosclerosis-related diseases such as acute ischemic stroke (AIS), acute myocardial infarction (AMI), diabetes mellitus (DM), and chronic kidney disease (CKD). Biomarkers for transient ischemic attack (TIA) and non-ST segment elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTEACS) are potentially useful for detection of early phase of atherosclerotic changes against AIS and AMI, respectively.Entities:
Keywords: Acute ischemic stroke; Acute myocardial infarction; Atherosclerosis; Autoantibody biomarker; Biomarkers; Cardiology; Cardiovascular system; Clinical research; DNAJC2; Diagnostics; Hematological system; Neurology; Neurosurgery
Year: 2020 PMID: 32904265 PMCID: PMC7452465 DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e04661
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Heliyon ISSN: 2405-8440
Baseline characteristics of subjects.
| Screening | Validation cohort | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TIA (n = 20) | Stroke (n = 621) | HD (n = 285) | |||
| cCI (n = 65) | AIS (n = 464) | TIA (n = 92) | |||
| Age (years) | 67.5 ± 19.1 | 73.3 ± 9.2∗∗ | 75.5 ± 11.5∗∗ | 70.2 ± 11.6∗∗ | 52.3 ± 11.7 |
| Male gender | 12 (60.0%) | 48 (73.8%) | 271 (58.4%) | 55 (59.7%) | 188 (65.9%) |
| Hypertension | 13 (65.0%) | 53 (81.5%)∗∗ | 335 (72.2%)∗∗ | 60 (65.2%)∗∗ | 57 (20.0%) |
| Diabetes | 7 (35.0%) | 22 (33.8%)∗∗ | 125 (26.9%)∗∗ | 26 (28.3%)∗∗ | 11 (3.9%) |
| Hyperlipidemia | 8 (40.0%) | 25 (38.5%)∗∗ | 122 (26.3%)∗∗ | 36 (39.1%)∗∗ | 40 (14.0%) |
| CVD | 1 (5.0%) | 2 (3.1%)∗∗ | 40 (8.6%)∗∗ | 5 (5.4%)∗∗ | 0 (0.0%) |
| Obesity (BMI ≥ 25) | 5 (25.0%) | 11 (16.9%) | 127 (27.4%) | 30 (32.6%) | 88 (30.9%) |
| Smoking | 11 (55.0%) | 33 (50.8%) | 228 (49.1%) | 43 (46.7%) | 132 (46.3%) |
Data represents means (±SD) for continuous data and n (%) for categorical data.
∗∗p < 0.001 versus HD.
TIA, transient ischemic attack; AIS, acute ischemic stroke; HD, healthy donor; cCI, chronic cerebral infarction; CVD, cardiovascular disease.
Genes of candidate antigen in the screening.
| Gene name | Full name (Homology) | Accession No. | CDS | Site of cloned region |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NM_001539 | 192..1385 | 108..857 | ||
| NM_014377 | 252..2117 | 176..925 |
clone isolated by screening using sera of patients with TIA.
clone isolated by screening using sera of patients with NSTEACS.
Figure 1Western blot analysis. Glutathione-S-transferase (GST) (lane 1) and affinity-purified GST-tagged DnaJ heat shock protein family (Hsp40) member C2 (DNAJC2) (lane 2) proteins were separated on sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gels and blotted using an anti-GST antibody (a); the sera of healthy donors (HDs) (b); or the sera of patients with transient ischemic attack (TIA) (c, d), acute ischemic stroke (AIS) (e), non-ST segment elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTEACS). (f), and acute myocardial infarction (AMI) (g). Arrows at 58 kDa and 28 kDa indicate GST-DNAJC2 and GST proteins, respectively. Asterisks indicate partially degraded proteins. Molecular weights are shown on the left. The full, non-adjusted image of Figure 1 is shown in the supplementary figure S1.
Figure 2Serum levels of DNAJC2 antibodies (DNAJC2-Abs) in stroke patients examined by amplified luminescent proximity homogeneous assay-linked immunosorbent assay (AlphaLISA) in the validation cohort. The DNAJC2-Ab levels measured as Alpha photon counts were compared between the HDs and the patients with TIA, AIS, or chronic-phase cerebral infarction (cCI) in box-whisker plots displaying the 10th, 20th, 50th, 80th, and 90th percentiles (a). ∗∗∗p < 0.001 by the Mann–Whitney U test with type I error adjustment using the Bonferroni procedure, not significant (n.s.), p = 1 by the Kruskal–Wallis test with type I error adjustment using the Bonferroni procedure. Receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) analysis was performed to assess the ability of DNAJC2-Abs to detect TIA (b), AIS (c), and chronic cerebral infarction (cCI) (d). Table 3 summarizes areas under the curves (AUCs), 95% confidence intervals (CIs), cutoff values, sensitivity, specificity, and p values calculated using ROC analysis.
Summary of receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis.
| TIA | AIS | cCI | AMI | DM | Type 1 CKD | Type 2 CKD | Type 3 CKD | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUC∗ | 0.6477 | 0.6619 | 0.6987 | 0.6714 | 0.6765 | 0.8182 | 0.8232 | 0.7305 |
| 95% CI | 0.5814–0.7140 | 0.6225–0.7013 | 0.6278–0.7697 | 0.6053–0.7376 | 0.6112–0.7419 | 0.7605–0.8759 | 0.7432–0.9031 | 0.6597–0.8013 |
| Cutoff value | 8,193 | 9,836 | 9,102 | 23,188 | 25,354 | 9,973 | 12,374 | 10,878 |
| Sensitivity (%) | 61.96 | 44.83 | 60.00 | 43.75 | 36.72 | 91.72 | 75.00 | 72.36 |
| Specificity (%) | 63.86 | 81.05 | 73.68 | 86.72 | 95.31 | 57.32 | 78.05 | 65.85 |
| <0.0001 | <0.0001 | <0.0001 | <0.0001 | <0.0001 | <0.0001 | <0.0001 | <0.0001 |
∗Area under the curve (AUC) values, 95% confidence interval (CI), cutoff values, sensitivity (%), specificity (%), and p values calculated by ROC analysis are shown.
Figure 3Association between DNAJC2-Ab levels and other clinical parameters in stroke patients. Correlations between DNAJC2-Ab levels and age (a), sex (b), hypertension (c), diabetes mellitus (DM) (d), hyperlipidemia (e), cardiovascular disease (CVD) (f), obesity (body mass index ≥25) (g), and smoking (h) were examined using Spearman's correlation analysis (a) or the Mann–Whitney U test (b–h).
Logistic regression of predictive factors for AIS (n = 906; no. of events = 621).
| Univariate analysis | Multivariate analysis | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OR | 95% CI | OR | 95% CI | |||
| Age (≥60) | 18.9 | 13.2–26.9 | <0.0001 | 10.8 | 7.26–16.1 | <0.0001 |
| Male | 0.77 | 0.58–1.03 | 0.0835 | |||
| HT | 10.4 | 7.38–14.5 | <0.0001 | 4.96 | 3.32–7.41 | <0.0001 |
| DM | 9.62 | 5.13–18.0 | <0.0001 | 5.71 | 2.73–11.9 | <0.0001 |
| HL | 2.56 | 1.76–3.73 | <0.0001 | 1.00 | 0.61–1.64 | 0.9991 |
| CVD | 11.6 | 2.79–48.0 | 0.0007 | 2.37 | 0.54–10.5 | 0.2560 |
| Obesity (BMI ≥ 25) | 0.87 | 0.64–1.18 | 0.3767 | |||
| Smoking | 1.13 | 0.85–1.49 | 0.4104 | |||
| DNAJC2 (>9837) | 3.41 | 2.44–4.76 | <0.0001 | 2.14 | 1.39–3.30 | 0.0005 |
HT, hypertension; DM, diabetes mellitus; HL, hyperlipidemia; CVD, cardiovascular disease; OR, odds ratio, 95% CI, 95% confidence interval.
DNAJC2, elevated DNAJC2-Ab levels. DNAJC2-Ab cutoff was 9837 based on ROC curve analysis.
Logistic regression of predictive factors for TIA (n = 377; no. of events = 92).
| Univariate analysis | Multivariate analysis | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OR | 95% CI | OR | 95% CI | |||
| Age (≥60) | 9.97 | 5.65–17.6 | <0.0001 | 5.16 | 2.75–9.66 | <0.0001 |
| Male | 0.74 | 0.46–1.21 | 0.2304 | |||
| HT | 7.50 | 4.47–12.6 | <0.0001 | 3.38 | 1.86–6.14 | <0.0001 |
| DM | 9.81 | 4.61–20.9 | <0.0001 | 4.15 | 1.66–10.4 | 0.0023 |
| HL | 3.94 | 2.30–6.73 | <0.0001 | 2.03 | 1.05–3.92 | 0.0342 |
| CVD | 8.13 | 1.55–42.7 | 0.0132 | 1.22 | 0.20–7.51 | 0.8297 |
| Obesity (BMI ≥ 25) | 1.13 | 0.68–1.88 | 0.6301 | |||
| Smoking | 1.01 | 0.63–1.62 | 0.9653 | |||
| DNAJC2 (>9837) | 3.22 | 1.94–5.34 | <0.0001 | 2.54 | 1.36–4.74 | 0.0034 |
HT, hypertension; DM, diabetes mellitus; HL, hyperlipidemia; CVD, cardiovascular disease; OR, odds ratio, 95% CI, 95% confidence interval.
DNAJC2, elevated DNAJC2-Ab levels. DNAJC2-Ab cutoff was 9837 based on ROC curve analysis.
Figure 4Association between DNAJC2-Ab levels and other atherosclerotic diseases including AMI and DM. (a) Serum DNAJC2-Ab levels of the HDs and the patients with AMI or DM determined by AlphaLISA are shown as box-whisker plots, as described in the legend of Figure 2. The mean ages (±standard deviation) of the HDs and the patients with AMI and DM were 58.29 ± 5.63, 58.28 ± 8.5, and 58.37 ± 9.11 years, respectively. Results of the ROC analysis of DNAJC2-Abs to detect AMI (b), and DM (c) are also shown. ∗∗∗p < 0.001 by the Mann–Whitney U test with type I error adjustment using the Bonferroni procedure.
Figure 5Association between DNAJC2-Ab levels and chronic kidney disease (CKD). (a) Serum DNAJC2-Ab levels of the HDs and the patients with CKD are shown as box-whisker plots, as described in the legend of Figure 2. CKD patients were divided into three groups: type 1, diabetic kidney disease; type 2, nephrosclerosis; and type 3, glomerulonephritis. The mean age (±standard deviation) of the HDs and the patients with type 1, 2, and 3 CKD were 45.82 ± 11.66, 65.78 ± 10.28, 75.97 ± 9.94, and 66.05 ± 14.60 years, respectively. Results of the ROC analysis of DNAJC2-Abs to detect type 1, 2, and 3 CKD (b–d) are also shown. ∗∗∗p < 0.001 by the Mann–Whitney U test with type I error adjustment using the Bonferroni procedure.
Validation of predictive factors for stroke (n = 906; no. of events = 621).
| Clinical risk factor | Clinical risk factor | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stroke (+) | Stroke (-) | PPV | Stroke (+) | Stroke (-) | PPV | |
| Age (≥60) | 545 | 79 | 87.3% | 258 | 17 | 93.8% |
| HT | 448 | 57 | 88.7% | 212 | 15 | 93.4% |
| DM | 173 | 11 | 94.0% | 82 | 1 | 98.8% |
| Age (≥60) + HT | 406 | 28 | 93.5% | 199 | 7 | 96.6% |
| Age (≥60) + DM | 154 | 5 | 96.9% | 76 | 1 | 98.7% |
| HT + DM | 140 | 5 | 96.6% | 69 | 0 | 100% |
| Age (≥60) + HT + DM | 128 | 2 | 98.5% | 65 | 0 | 100% |
HT, hypertension; DM, diabetes mellitus; PPV, positive predictive value.
DNAJC2, elevated DNAJC2-Ab levels. DNAJC2-Ab cutoff was 9837 based on ROC curve analysis.