| Literature DB >> 29464021 |
Hao Wang1,2, Xiao-Meng Zhang1, Go Tomiyoshi1,3, Rika Nakamura1,3, Natsuko Shinmen1,3, Hideyuki Kuroda3, Risa Kimura1, Seiichiro Mine4,5,6, Ikuo Kamitsukasa7,8, Takeshi Wada9, Akiyo Aotsuka9, Yoichi Yoshida1,4, Eiichi Kobayashi4, Tomoo Matsutani4, Yasuo Iwadate4, Kazuo Sugimoto1,10, Masahiro Mori10, Akiyuki Uzawa10, Mayumi Muto10, Satoshi Kuwabara10, Minoru Takemoto11, Kazuki Kobayashi11, Harukiyo Kawamura11, Ryoichi Ishibashi11, Koutaro Yokote11, Mikiko Ohno12,13, Po-Min Chen12, Eiichiro Nishi12,13, Koh Ono12, Takeshi Kimura12, Toshio Machida6, Hirotaka Takizawa14, Koichi Kashiwado15, Hideaki Shimada16, Masaaki Ito16, Ken-Ichiro Goto1, Katsuro Iwase1, Hiromi Ashino1, Akiko Taira1, Emiko Arita1, Masaki Takiguchi1, Takaki Hiwasa1.
Abstract
Transient ischemic attack (TIA) is a predictor for cerebral infarction (CI), and early diagnosis of TIA is extremely important for the prevention of CI. We set out to identify novel antibody biomarkers for TIA and CI, and detected matrix metalloproteinase 1 (MMP1), chromobox homolog 1 (CBX1), and chromobox homolog 5 (CBX5) as candidate antigens using serological identification of antigens by recombinant cDNA expression cloning (SEREX) and Western blotting to confirm the presence of serum antibodies against the antigens. Amplified luminescent proximity homogeneous assay-linked immunosorbent assay (AlphaLISA) revealed that serum antibody levels were significantly higher in patients with TIA or acute-phase CI (aCI) compared with healthy donors (P < 0.01). Spearman's correlation analysis and multivariate logistic regression analysis demonstrated that levels of anti-MMP1, anti-CBX1, and anti-CBX5 antibodies were associated with age, cigarette-smoking habits, and blood pressure. Thus, serum levels of antibodies against MMP1, CBX1, and CBX5 could potentially serve as useful tools for diagnosing TIA and predicting the onset of aCI.Entities:
Keywords: Gerotarget; SEREX; TIA; antibody biomarker; atherosclerosis; cerebral infarction
Year: 2017 PMID: 29464021 PMCID: PMC5814161 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.23789
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Oncotarget ISSN: 1949-2553
Figure 1Immunoscreening of TIA antigens by SEREX
Recombinant expression cloning proteins were blotted onto nitrocellulose membranes and reacted with sera from 19 TIA patients. Arrows indicate positive phage clones. Positive clones were recloned twice to obtain monoclonality.
Figure 2The presence of serum antibodies against MMP1, CBX1, and CBX5 antigenic proteins
Representative results of Western blotting are shown, which revealed that all of the affinity-purified GST fusion antigenic proteins were detected at the expected sizes (GST-MMP1: 65 kDa; GST-CBX1: 50 kDa; and GST-CBX5: 52 kDa). GST and GST fusion proteins were electrophoresed through SDS-polyacrylamide gels followed by staining with Coomassie Brilliant Blue (CBB) or Western blotting using anti-GST (αGST) or patient sera (#256, #297, and #304). Arrows indicate specific reactions to GST-MMP1 and GST-CBX1, and the asterisk represents degradation products after electrophoresis. Molecular weights are shown to the left.
Figure 3Comparison of serum MMP1-Abs, CBX1-Abs, and CBX5-Abs levels between HDs and TIA or aCI patients
Antigens used were GST-MMP1 a., GST-CBX1 b., and GST-CBX5 c. Serum levels of antibodies after subtraction of the levels against control GST examined by AlphaLISA are shown using a box-whisker. The box plots display the 10th, 20th, 50th, 80th, and 90th percentiles. P values vs. HD specimens are shown. Table 1 shows the averages, SDs, cutoff values, total numbers, positivity numbers, positivity rates (%), and P values.
Comparison of serum antibody levels between HDs and TIA or aCI patients examined by AlphaLISA
| MMP1 | CBX1 | CBX5 | ||
| HD | Average | 16,284 | 30,297 | 22,668 |
| SD | 7,104 | 5,671 | 4,693 | |
| Cutoff value | 30,492 | 41,640 | 32,054 | |
| Total number | 119 | 123 | 122 | |
| Positive number | 3 | 3 | 2 | |
| Positive rate | 2.50% | 2.40% | 1.60% | |
| TIA | Average | 20,505 | 33,969 | 25,153 |
| SD | 8,688 | 6,764 | 5,129 | |
| Total number | 74 | 77 | 77 | |
| Positive number | 7 | 8 | 6 | |
| Positive rate | 9.50% | 7.80% | ||
| aCI | Average | 19,928 | 32,642 | 25,318 |
| SD | 8,435 | 6,835 | 5,029 | |
| Total number | 153 | 158 | 158 | |
| Positive number | 16 | 18 | 15 | |
| Positive rate | 9.50% | |||
| 0.64 | 0.16 | 0.82 |
The average, SD, cutoff values (average + 2SD), total sample number, number of serum samples in which antibody levels exceeded the cutoff value, and the positivity rate (%) are presented for HDs and patients as well as P values of statistical comparisons between HDs and patients. The antigens used were purified GST-MMP1, GST-CBX1, and GST-CBX5 proteins. P values lower than 0.05 and positivity rates higher than 10% are marked in bold.
Figure 4ROC analysis of MMP1-Abs, CBX1-Abs, and CBX5-Abs for the prediction of TIA or aCI
Numbers in the curves indicate cutoff values for marker levels, and those in parentheses indicate sensitivity (left) and specificity (right). AUC, 95% CI, and P values are shown.
Figure 5Comparison of serum MMP1-Ab levels between HDs and AMI or DM patients
Serum antibody levels against MMP1 in HDs and AMI a. or DM b. patients examined by AlphaLISA are shown using a box-whisker plot. The box plots display the 10th, 20th, 50th, 80th, and 90th percentiles. Table 2 shows the averages, SDs, a cutoff value, total numbers, positivity numbers, positivity rates (%), and P values.
Comparison of MMP1 antibody levels between HDs and AMI or DM patients examined by AlphaLISA
| MMP1 | ||
| HD | Average | 15,338 |
| SD | 3,655 | |
| Cutoff value | 22,649 | |
| Total number | 128 | |
| Positive number | 2 | |
| Positive rate | 1.60% | |
| AMI | Average | 19,578 |
| SD | 4,766 | |
| Total number | 128 | |
| Positive number | 34 | |
| Positive rate | ||
| DM | Average | 18,306 |
| SD | 5,897 | |
| Total number | 128 | |
| Positive number | 30 | |
| Positive rate | ||
| 0.059 |
The antigens used were purified GST-MMP1 proteins. See Table 1 for further details.
Figure 6ROC analysis of MMP1-Abs levels for predicting AMI and DM
ROC curves for assessing the ability of MMP1-Abs to predict AMI a. or DM b. are shown. Numbers in the figures are the same as those shown in Figure 4.
Comparison of CBX5 antibody levels between HDs and DM patients examined by AlphaLISA
| CBX5 | ||
| HD | Average | 17,132 |
| SD | 3,333 | |
| Cutoff value | 23,799 | |
| Total number | 128 | |
| Positive number | 4 | |
| Positive rate | 3.10% | |
| DM | Average | 18,909 |
| SD | 4,083 | |
| Total number | 128 | |
| Positive number | 12 | |
| Positive rate | 9.40% | |
The antigens used were purified GST-CBX5 proteins. See Table 1 for further details.
Figure 7Comparison of serum CBX5-Abs levels between HDs and DM patients
Serum antibody levels against CBX5 in HDs and DM patients examined by AlphaLISA are shown by a box-whisker plot a. The box plots display the 10th, 20th, 50th, 80th, and 90th percentiles. Table 3 shows averages, SDs, one cutoff value, total numbers, positivity numbers, positivity rates (%), and P values. The results were also evaluated by ROC analysis b.
Correlation analysis between serum antibody marker levels and the indices in HDs, TIA and aCI patients.
| MMP1 | CBX1 | CBX5 | ||||||||||
| Spearman | Multivariate | Spearman | Multivariate | Spearman | Multivariate | |||||||
| r value | r value | r value | r value | r value | r value | |||||||
| Gender | 0.031 | 0.5712 | 0.069 | 0.2207 | 0.063 | 0.2356 | -0.012 | 0.8291 | -0.054 | 0.3055 | 0.111 | |
| Age | 0.191 | -0.146 | 0.253 | 0.056 | 0.3073 | 0.189 | 0.062 | 0.2658 | ||||
| Height | -0.072 | 0.1887 | 0.010 | 0.8622 | -0.106 | -0.114 | 0.012 | 0.8243 | -0.074 | 0.1803 | ||
| Weight | -0.023 | 0.6786 | -0.013 | 0.8206 | -0.034 | 0.5212 | 0.100 | 0.0704 | 0.054 | 0.3149 | 0.105 | 0.0574 |
| BMI | 0.009 | 0.8676 | 0.006 | 0.9086 | 0.032 | 0.5468 | -0.087 | 0.1168 | 0.047 | 0.3829 | -0.100 | 0.0692 |
| Blood pressure | 0.117 | 0.006 | 0.9212 | 0.086 | 0.1399 | -0.114 | 0.158 | 0.173 | ||||
| Smoking | 0.163 | -0.076 | 0.1759 | 0.117 | -0.024 | 0.6581 | 0.219 | 0.103 | 0.0628 | |||
| Smoking period | 0.237 | 0.136 | 0.187 | -0.006 | 0.9174 | 0.264 | 0.058 | 0.2902 | ||||
| Alcohol | -0.033 | 0.5469 | 0.102 | 0.0709 | -0.100 | 0.0602 | 0.053 | 0.3354 | -0.026 | 0.6209 | -0.026 | 0.6365 |
| Alcohol frequency | -0.002 | 0.9677 | -0.123 | -0.066 | 0.2204 | -0.063 | 0.2543 | 0.059 | 0.2683 | 0.020 | 0.7142 | |
| Working | -0.187 | -0.112 | -0.200 | -0.013 | 0.8076 | -0.130 | -0.037 | 0.5033 | ||||
| WBC | 0.128 | 0.031 | 0.5887 | 0.007 | 0.9028 | 0.020 | 0.7177 | 0.132 | -0.086 | 0.1182 | ||
| RBC | -0.005 | 0.9287 | 0.007 | 0.9005 | -0.016 | 0.7713 | -0.058 | 0.2969 | 0.040 | 0.4629 | -0.034 | 0.5357 |
| PLT | -0.133 | -0.069 | 0.2209 | -0.125 | -0.033 | 0.5535 | -0.142 | -0.066 | 0.2325 | |||
| TC | -0.141 | 0.040 | 0.4756 | -0.133 | -0.174 | -0.107 | 0.0668 | -0.065 | 0.2429 | |||
| HDL-c | -0.081 | 0.2093 | -0.030 | 0.5976 | -0.111 | 0.0795 | 0.031 | 0.5729 | -0.109 | 0.0847 | 0.013 | 0.8109 |
| LDL-c | -0.129 | -0.076 | 0.1767 | -0.069 | 0.2748 | 0.177 | -0.063 | 0.3149 | 0.021 | 0.7043 | ||
| TG | 0.049 | 0.4354 | 0.042 | 0.4590 | 0.041 | 0.5019 | 0.009 | 0.8674 | 0.123 | 0.091 | 0.0999 | |
| Total protein | 0.039 | 0.4854 | 0.024 | 0.6738 | 0.028 | 0.6071 | 0.136 | -0.012 | 0.8340 | -0.081 | 0.1448 | |
| Albumin | 0.003 | 0.9601 | 0.001 | 0.9879 | -0.044 | 0.4319 | -0.080 | 0.1485 | -0.013 | 0.8229 | 0.135 | |
| tBil | -0.035 | 0.5350 | -0.025 | 0.6592 | -0.007 | 0.8944 | -0.009 | 0.8767 | -0.012 | 0.8325 | 0.009 | 0.8643 |
| AST | 0.051 | 0.3490 | 0.106 | 0.0602 | 0.015 | 0.7746 | 0.051 | 0.3548 | 0.075 | 0.1649 | 0.098 | 0.0747 |
| ALT | -0.044 | 0.4192 | -0.113 | -0.096 | 0.0743 | -0.138 | 0.001 | 0.9781 | -0.094 | 0.0873 | ||
| γ-GTP | 0.047 | 0.4177 | -0.025 | 0.6538 | 0.028 | 0.6177 | 0.090 | 0.1014 | 0.139 | -0.010 | 0.8506 | |
| ALP | 0.110 | 0.0785 | 0.012 | 0.8255 | 0.096 | 0.1175 | 0.026 | 0.6382 | 0.108 | 0.0796 | 0.011 | 0.8398 |
| LDH | 0.134 | 0.019 | 0.7343 | 0.093 | 0.0970 | -0.052 | 0.3434 | 0.141 | 0.100 | 0.0706 | ||
| UA | 0.019 | 0.7571 | 0.098 | 0.0815 | 0.072 | 0.2247 | 0.176 | 0.104 | 0.0803 | -0.046 | 0.4086 | |
| CRP | 0.114 | 0.0699 | -0.127 | 0.066 | 0.2821 | -0.117 | 0.154 | 0.028 | 0.6133 | |||
| HbA1C | 0.067 | 0.2951 | -0.027 | 0.6277 | 0.097 | 0.1193 | 0.016 | 0.7755 | 0.066 | 0.2884 | 0.073 | 0.1855 |
The data on study individuals were obtained from HD subjects in Chiba Prefectural Sawara Hospital and Port Square Kashiwado Clinic and TIA or aCI patients in Chiba Prefectural Sawara Hospital, Chiba Rosai Hospital, and Chiba Aoba Municipal Hospital. Correlation coefficients (r) and P values were calculated via Spearman’s correlation analysis and multivariate logistic regression analysis. P values less than 0.05 are marked in bold.
Baseline characteristics of participants in HD, TIA and aCI groups
| HD | TIA | aCI | |
|---|---|---|---|
| (Total of 123) | (Total of 77) | (Total of 158) | |
| Male gender | 85 (69.1) | 48 (62.3) | 119 (75.3) |
| Age | 51.85 ± 8.75 | 69.6 ± 11.74 | 57.67 ± 7.61 |
| Height | 165.86 ± 8.72 | 158.79 ± 10.41 | 163.79 ± 8.45 |
| Weight | 65.67± 13.06 | 59.68 ± 11.71 | 64.81 ± 12.46 |
| Body mass index | 23.77 ± 3.98 | 23.67 ± 3.46 | 24.1 ± 4 |
| Smoking | 62 (50.4) | 42 (54.5) | 105 (66.5) |
| Hypertension | 15 (12.2) | 48 (62.3) | 90 (57) |
| DM | 0 | 18 (23.4) | 42 (26.6) |
The HDs were from Chiba Prefectural Sawara Hospital and Port Square Kashiwado Clinic. The TIA or aCI patients were from Chiba Prefectural Sawara Hospital, Chiba Rosai Hospital, and Chiba Aoba Municipal Hospital. Classical risk factors for atherosclerosis, including gender, age, body mass index, smoking, incidence of hypertension and diabetes, were evaluated from clinical records. Participants were considered as smoking if they currently smoked or had a history of smoking. Hypertension was defined as a history of blood pressure above 140 mmHg in systolic or 90 mmHg in diastolic pressure or the use of antihypertensive agents. DM was defined as having undergone antidiabetic therapy or having a history of diabetes. Data expresses as the average ± standard deviation for numerical data and n (%) for categorical data.