Literature DB >> 29332995

On the Functional Form of Temporal Discounting: An Optimized Adaptive Test.

Daniel R Cavagnaro1, Gabriel J Aranovich2, Samuel M McClure3, Mark A Pitt4, Jay I Myung4.   

Abstract

The tendency to discount the value of future rewards has become one of the best-studied constructs in the behavioral sciences. Although hyperbolic discounting remains the dominant quantitative characterization of this phenomenon, a variety of models have been proposed and consensus around the one that most accurately describes behavior has been elusive. To help bring some clarity to this issue, we propose an Adaptive Design Optimization (ADO) method for fitting and comparing models of temporal discounting. We then conduct an ADO experiment aimed at discriminating among six popular models of temporal discounting. Rather than supporting a single underlying model, our results show that each model is inadequate in some way to describe the full range of behavior exhibited across subjects. The precision of results provided by ADO further identify specific properties of models, such as accommodating both increasing and decreasing impatience, that are mandatory to describe temporal discounting broadly.

Entities:  

Keywords:  adaptive designs; design optimization; intertemporal choice; model selection; temporal discounting

Year:  2016        PMID: 29332995      PMCID: PMC5764197          DOI: 10.1007/s11166-016-9242-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Risk Uncertain        ISSN: 0895-5646


  42 in total

1.  The Importance of Complexity in Model Selection.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Math Psychol       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 2.223

2.  Mild opioid deprivation increases the degree that opioid-dependent outpatients discount delayed heroin and money.

Authors:  Louis A Giordano; Warren K Bickel; George Loewenstein; Eric A Jacobs; Lisa Marsch; Gary J Badger
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2002-07-13       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 3.  A review of delay-discounting research with humans: relations to drug use and gambling.

Authors:  Brady Reynolds
Journal:  Behav Pharmacol       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 2.293

Review 4.  A framework for studying the neurobiology of value-based decision making.

Authors:  Antonio Rangel; Colin Camerer; P Read Montague
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2008-06-11       Impact factor: 34.870

5.  Sweet future: fluctuating blood glucose levels affect future discounting.

Authors:  X T Wang; Robert D Dvorak
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2010-01-20

6.  Do pretty women inspire men to discount the future?

Authors:  Margo Wilson; Martin Daly
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2004-05-07       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 7.  Changing delay discounting in the light of the competing neurobehavioral decision systems theory: a review.

Authors:  Mikhail N Koffarnus; David P Jarmolowicz; E Terry Mueller; Warren K Bickel
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2012-12-05       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Optimal Decision Stimuli for Risky Choice Experiments: An Adaptive Approach.

Authors:  Daniel R Cavagnaro; Richard Gonzalez; Jay I Myung; Mark A Pitt
Journal:  Manage Sci       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 4.883

9.  Dopamine, time, and impulsivity in humans.

Authors:  Alex Pine; Tamara Shiner; Ben Seymour; Raymond J Dolan
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-06-30       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Formal comparison of dual-parameter temporal discounting models in controls and pathological gamblers.

Authors:  Jan Peters; Stephan Franz Miedl; Christian Büchel
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-11-30       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  7 in total

1.  A Model Guided Approach to Evoke Homogeneous Behavior During Temporal Reward and Loss Discounting.

Authors:  Janine Thome; Mathieu Pinger; Patrick Halli; Daniel Durstewitz; Wolfgang H Sommer; Peter Kirsch; Georgia Koppe
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2022-06-21       Impact factor: 5.435

2.  On the Appropriate Measure to Estimate Hyperbolic Discounting Rate (K) using the Method of Least Squares.

Authors:  Harli R Berk; Tanya A Gupta; Federico Sanabria
Journal:  Perspect Behav Sci       Date:  2021-08-12

Review 3.  Asking the right questions about the psychology of human inquiry: Nine open challenges.

Authors:  Anna Coenen; Jonathan D Nelson; Todd M Gureckis
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2019-10

4.  On the Neural and Mechanistic Bases of Self-Control.

Authors:  Brandon M Turner; Christian A Rodriguez; Qingfang Liu; M Fiona Molloy; Marjolein Hoogendijk; Samuel M McClure
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2019-02-01       Impact factor: 5.357

5.  ADOpy: a python package for adaptive design optimization.

Authors:  Jaeyeong Yang; Mark A Pitt; Woo-Young Ahn; Jay I Myung
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2021-04

6.  Rapid, precise, and reliable measurement of delay discounting using a Bayesian learning algorithm.

Authors:  Woo-Young Ahn; Hairong Gu; Yitong Shen; Nathaniel Haines; Hunter A Hahn; Julie E Teater; Jay I Myung; Mark A Pitt
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-07-21       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Flexible Utility Function Approximation via Cubic Bezier Splines.

Authors:  Sangil Lee; Chris M Glaze; Eric T Bradlow; Joseph W Kable
Journal:  Psychometrika       Date:  2020-09-26       Impact factor: 2.500

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.