Literature DB >> 16688451

Monitoring chemotherapy and radiotherapy of solid tumors.

Wolfgang A Weber1, Hinrich Wieder.   

Abstract

PET imaging with the glucose analog fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG-PET) has been evaluated in numerous studies to monitor tumor response in patients undergoing chemo- and radiotherapy. The clinical value of FDG-PET for differentiation of residual or recurrent viable tumor and therapy-induced fibrosis or scar tissue has been documented for various solid tumors. Furthermore, there are now several reports suggesting that quantitative assessment of therapy-induced changes in tumor FDG uptake may allow prediction of tumor response and patient outcome very early in the course of therapy. In nonresponding patients, treatment may be adjusted according to the individual chemo- and radiosensitivity of the tumor tissue. Since the number of alternative treatments for solid tumors (e.g., second-line chemotherapy agents, protein kinase, or angiogenesis inhibitors) is continuously increasing, early prediction of tumor response to chemotherapy and radiotherapy by FDG-PET has enormous potential to "personalize" treatment and to reduce the side-effects and costs of ineffective therapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16688451     DOI: 10.1007/s00259-006-0133-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging        ISSN: 1619-7070            Impact factor:   9.236


  64 in total

1.  New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, National Cancer Institute of the United States, National Cancer Institute of Canada.

Authors:  P Therasse; S G Arbuck; E A Eisenhauer; J Wanders; R S Kaplan; L Rubinstein; J Verweij; M Van Glabbeke; A T van Oosterom; M C Christian; S G Gwyther
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2000-02-02       Impact factor: 13.506

2.  Prediction of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy by sequential F-18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in patients with advanced-stage ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Norbert Avril; Stefanie Sassen; Barbara Schmalfeldt; Joerg Naehrig; Stephan Rutke; Wolfgang A Weber; Martin Werner; Henner Graeff; Markus Schwaiger; Walther Kuhn
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2005-09-12       Impact factor: 44.544

3.  PET/CT with intravenous contrast can be used for PET attenuation correction in cancer patients.

Authors:  A K Berthelsen; S Holm; A Loft; T L Klausen; F Andersen; L Højgaard
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2005-05-21       Impact factor: 9.236

4.  Enhanced staging and all chemotherapy preoperatively in patients with potentially resectable gastric carcinoma.

Authors:  J A Ajani; P F Mansfield; P M Lynch; P W Pisters; B Feig; P Dumas; D B Evans; I Raijman; K Hargraves; S Curley; D M Ota
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  Positron emission tomography using [(18)F]-fluorodeoxy-D-glucose to predict the pathologic response of breast cancer to primary chemotherapy.

Authors:  I C Smith; A E Welch; A W Hutcheon; I D Miller; S Payne; F Chilcott; S Waikar; T Whitaker; A K Ah-See; O Eremin; S D Heys; F J Gilbert; P F Sharp
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  FDG PET studies during treatment: prediction of therapy outcome in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Eva Brun; Elisabeth Kjellén; Jan Tennvall; Tomas Ohlsson; Anders Sandell; Roland Perfekt; Roland Perfekt; Johan Wennerberg; Sven Erik Strand
Journal:  Head Neck       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 3.147

7.  Tumor Treatment Response Based on Visual and Quantitative Changes in Global Tumor Glycolysis Using PET-FDG Imaging. The Visual Response Score and the Change in Total Lesion Glycolysis.

Authors:  Steven M. Larson; Yusuf Erdi; Timothy Akhurst; Madhu Mazumdar; Homer A. Macapinlac; Ronald D. Finn; Cecille Casilla; Melissa Fazzari; Neil Srivastava; Henry W.D. Yeung; John L. Humm; Jose Guillem; Robert Downey; Martin Karpeh; Alfred E. Cohen; Robert Ginsberg
Journal:  Clin Positron Imaging       Date:  1999-05

8.  Fluorodeoxyglucose uptake in vitro: aspects of method and effects of treatment with gemcitabine.

Authors:  U Haberkorn; I Morr; F Oberdorfer; M E Bellemann; J Blatter; A Altmann; B Kahn; G van Kaick
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 10.057

9.  Positron emission tomography scanning poorly predicts response to preoperative chemotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Jeffrey L Port; Michael S Kent; Robert J Korst; Roger Keresztes; Matthew A Levin; Nasser K Altorki
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 4.330

10.  In vitro assessment of 2-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose, L-methionine and thymidine as agents to monitor the early response of a human adenocarcinoma cell line to radiotherapy.

Authors:  K Higashi; A C Clavo; R L Wahl
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 10.057

View more
  40 in total

1.  Instrumentation factors affecting variance and bias of quantifying tracer uptake with PET/CT.

Authors:  R K Doot; J S Scheuermann; P E Christian; J S Karp; P E Kinahan
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Assessment of histological response of paediatric bone sarcomas using FDG PET in comparison to morphological volume measurement and standardized MRI parameters.

Authors:  Timm Denecke; Patrick Hundsdörfer; Daniel Misch; Ingo G Steffen; Stefan Schönberger; Christian Furth; Michail Plotkin; Juri Ruf; Hubertus Hautzel; Brigitte Stöver; Regine Kluge; Uta Bierbach; Sylke Otto; James F Beck; Christiane Franzius; Günter Henze; Holger Amthauer
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2010-05-27       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 3.  Utility of functional imaging in prediction or assessment of treatment response and prognosis following thermotherapy.

Authors:  Mark W Dewhirst; Donald E Thrall; Gregory Palmer; Thies Schroeder; Zeljko Vujaskovic; H Cecil Charles; James Macfall; Terence Wong
Journal:  Int J Hyperthermia       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 3.914

4.  PET imaging for Treatment Response in Cancer.

Authors:  Janet F Eary
Journal:  PET Clin       Date:  2008-01-01

5.  Value of (18)F-FDG PET/CT for therapeutic assessment of patients with polymyalgia rheumatica receiving tocilizumab as first-line treatment.

Authors:  X Palard-Novello; S Querellou; M Gouillou; A Saraux; T Marhadour; F Garrigues; R Abgral; P Y Salaün; V Devauchelle-Pensec
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2016-01-11       Impact factor: 9.236

6.  PET imaging of apoptosis in tumor-bearing mice and rabbits after paclitaxel treatment with (18)F(-)Labeled recombinant human His10-annexin V.

Authors:  Haidong Qin; Ming-Rong Zhang; Lin Xie; Yanjie Hou; Zichun Hua; Minjin Hu; Zizheng Wang; Feng Wang
Journal:  Am J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2014-12-15

7.  FDG-PET/CT Imaging Predicts Histopathologic Treatment Responses after Neoadjuvant Therapy in Adult Primary Bone Sarcomas.

Authors:  Matthias R Benz; Johannes Czernin; William D Tap; Jeffrey J Eckardt; Leanne L Seeger; Martin S Allen-Auerbach; Sarah M Dry; Michael E Phelps; Wolfgang A Weber; Fritz C Eilber
Journal:  Sarcoma       Date:  2010-04-18

8.  Early detection of response to experimental chemotherapeutic Top216 with [18F]FLT and [18F]FDG PET in human ovary cancer xenografts in mice.

Authors:  Mette Munk Jensen; Kamille Dumong Erichsen; Fredrik Björkling; Jacob Madsen; Peter Buhl Jensen; Liselotte Højgaard; Maxwell Sehested; Andreas Kjær
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-09-24       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Cancer Response Criteria and Bone Metastases: RECIST 1.1, MDA and PERCIST.

Authors:  Colleen M Costelloe; Hubert H Chuang; John E Madewell; Naoto T Ueno
Journal:  J Cancer       Date:  2010-06-28       Impact factor: 4.207

10.  Metabolic response evaluated by 18F-FDG PET/CT as a potential screening tool in identifying a subgroup of patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer for immediate maintenance therapy after first-line chemotherapy.

Authors:  Seung Hwan Moon; Su-Hee Cho; Lee Chun Park; Jun Ho Ji; Jong-Mu Sun; Jin Sock Ahn; Keunchil Park; Joon Young Choi; Myung-Ju Ahn
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2013-04-18       Impact factor: 9.236

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.