| Literature DB >> 32891179 |
Lei Wang1, Carol S Ringelberg2, Bal R Singh3,4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Gene expression profile analysis on mammalian cell lines and animal models after exposure to botulinum neurotoxin (BoNT) has been investigated in several studies in recent years. Microarray analysis provides a powerful tool for identifying critical signaling pathways involved in the biological and inflammatory responses to BoNT and helps determine the mechanism of the function of botulinum toxins. One of the pivotal clinical characteristics of BoNT is its prolonged on-site effects. The role of BoNT on the blockage of neurotransmitter acetylcholine release in the neuromuscular junction has been well established. However, the effects of the treatment time of BoNT on the human cellular model and its potential mechanism remain to be defined.Entities:
Keywords: Biological signaling; Botulinum neurotoxin type A; Clostridium botulinum; Gene expression profile; Host response; Microarray analysis; Neuroblastoma SH-SY5Y cells; Neurological signaling pathways; Zinc
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32891179 PMCID: PMC7487822 DOI: 10.1186/s40360-020-00443-0
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Pharmacol Toxicol ISSN: 2050-6511 Impact factor: 2.483
Fig. 1Heat map presentation of the differentially expressed genes after BoNT/A 4 and 48-h treatment. The heat map includes 1368 probes after running the ANOVA analysis with unadjusted p-value < 0.01. The values are mean centered with yellow indicating higher expression and blue indicating lower expression. Compared to the 4-h treatment, the 48-h treatment induces 744 up-regulated and 624 down-regulated genes
Fig. 2Proportions of numbers of genes involved in the top 20 Uniprot functional groups
Top five groups among the 122 identified DAVID functional groups
| Gene Function Group | # of Genes count | % of Genes | Probe # with > 2 fold change | Fold change range | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alternative splicing | 660 | 60.44 | 2.74E-21 | 79↑ 64↓ | 19.41 ~ 2.03 26.63 ~ 2.02 |
| Protein binding | 566 | 51.83 | 5.45E-12 | 47↑ 66↓ | 32.28 ~ 2.03 31.23 ~ 2.01 |
| Phosphoprotein | 560 | 51.28 | 3.77E-25 | 54↑ 64↓ | 32.28 ~ 2.03 31.23 ~ 2.01 |
| Splice variant | 517 | 47.34 | 1.27E-18 | 66↑ 52↓ | 11.66 ~ 2.03 26.63 ~ 2.01 |
| Nucleus | 363 | 33.24 | 1.51E-14 | 29↑ 34↓ | 16.95 ~ 2.03 31.23 ~ 2.01 |
BoNT/A effects with gene list and fold changes from the DAVID Analysis
| DAVID Analysis: Functional Annotation Groups | Gene Title (Gene Symbol) | Fold change 48 h vs. 4 h |
|---|---|---|
| Nervous system development | cholinergic receptor, muscarinic 3 (CHRM3) sparc/osteonectin, cwcv and kazal-like domains proteoglycan (testican) 1 (SPOCK1) neural epidermal growth factor-like EGFL like 1 (NELL1) | 32.28 ↑ 17.07 ↑ 16.95↑ |
| Proteinaceous extracellular matrix | collagen, type I, alpha 2 (COL1A2) | 11.99 ↓ |
| Signaling pathways regulating pluripotency of stem cells | inhibitor of DNA binding 3, dominant negative helix-loop-helix protein (ID3) inhibitor of DNA binding 2, dominant negative helix-loop-helix protein (ID2) | 8.13 ↓ 31.23 ↓ |
| Cellular function and signal Transduction | Rho GTPase activating protein 36 (ARHGAP36) | 11.66↑ |
| Apoptosis | insulin like growth factor binding protein 3 (IGFBP3) serum/glucocorticoid regulated kinase 1 (SGK1) | 13.26 ↓ 26.63 ↓ |
Fig. 3Functional groups listed by the up- or down-regulated set and the numbers of genes involved in each function group. a, 20 top functions for upregulated groups and b, 20 top functions for down-regulated groups