Literature DB >> 32890337

Colorectal resection in emergency general surgery: An EAST multicenter trial.

Brittany O Aicher1, Matthew C Hernandez, Alejandro Betancourt-Ramirez, Michael D Grossman, Holly Heise, Thomas J Schroeppel, Napaporn Kongkaewpaisan, Haytham M A Kaafarani, Afton Wagner, Daniel Grabo, Michael Scott, Gregory Peck, Gloria Chang, Kazuhide Matsushima, Daniel C Cullinane, Laura M Cullinane, Benjamin Stocker, Joseph Posluszny, Ursula J Simonoski, Richard D Catalano, Georgia Vasileiou, D Dante Yeh, Vaidehi Agrawal, Michael S Truitt, MaryAnne Pickett, Linda Dultz, Alison Muller, Adrian W Ong, Janika L San Roman, Nadine Barth, Oliver Fackelmayer, Catherine G Velopulos, Cheralyn Hendrix, Jordan M Estroff, Sahil Gambhir, Jeffry Nahmias, Kokila Jeyamurugan, Nikolay Bugaev, Victor Portillo, Matthew M Carrick, Lindsay O'Meara, Joseph Kufera, Martin D Zielinski, Brandon R Bruns.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Evidence comparing stoma creation (STM) versus anastomosis after urgent or emergent colorectal resection is limited. This study examined outcomes after colorectal resection in emergency general surgery patients.
METHODS: This was an Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma-sponsored prospective observational multicenter study of patients undergoing urgent/emergent colorectal resection. Twenty-one centers enrolled patients for 11 months. Preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative variables were recorded. χ, Mann-Whitney U test, and multivariable logistic regression models were used to describe outcomes and risk factors for surgical complication/mortality.
RESULTS: A total of 439 patients were enrolled (ANST, 184; STM, 255). The median (interquartile range) age was 62 (53-71) years, and the median Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) was 4 (1-6). The most common indication for surgery was diverticulitis (28%). Stoma group was older (64 vs. 58 years, p < 0.001), had a higher CCI, and were more likely to be immunosuppressed. Preoperatively, STM patients were more likely to be intubated (57 vs. 15, p < 0.001), on vasopressors (61 vs. 13, p < 0.001), have pneumoperitoneum (131 vs. 41, p < 0.001) or fecal contamination (114 vs. 33, p < 0.001), and had a higher incidence of elevated lactate (149 vs. 67, p < 0.001). Overall mortality was 13%, which was higher in STM patients (18% vs. 8%, p = 0.02). Surgical complications were more common in STM patients (35% vs. 25%, p = 0.02). On multivariable analysis, management with an open abdomen, intraoperative blood transfusion, and larger hospital size were associated with development of a surgical complication, while CCI, preoperative vasopressor use, steroid use, open abdomen, and intraoperative blood transfusion were independently associated with mortality.
CONCLUSION: This study highlights a tendency to perform fecal diversion in patients who are acutely ill at presentation. There is a higher morbidity and mortality rate in STM patients. Independent predictors of mortality include CCI, preoperative vasopressor use, steroid use, open abdomen, and intraoperative blood transfusion. Following adjustment by clinical factors, method of colon management was not associated with surgical complications or mortality. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic study, level IV.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32890337      PMCID: PMC7957828          DOI: 10.1097/TA.0000000000002894

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Trauma Acute Care Surg        ISSN: 2163-0755            Impact factor:   3.697


  27 in total

1.  Incidence, consequences, and risk factors for anastomotic dehiscence after colorectal surgery: a prospective monocentric study.

Authors:  Nicolas C Buchs; Pascal Gervaz; Michelle Secic; Pascal Bucher; Béatrice Mugnier-Konrad; Philippe Morel
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2007-11-22       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  Penetrating colon injuries requiring resection: diversion or primary anastomosis? An AAST prospective multicenter study.

Authors:  D Demetriades; J A Murray; L Chan; C Ordoñez; D Bowley; K K Nagy; E E Cornwell; G C Velmahos; N Muñoz; C Hatzitheofilou; C W Schwab; A Rodriguez; C Cornejo; K A Davis; N Namias; D H Wisner; R R Ivatury; E E Moore; J A Acosta; K I Maull; M H Thomason; D A Spain
Journal:  J Trauma       Date:  2001-05

3.  The incidence of anastomotic leaks in patients undergoing colorectal surgery.

Authors:  C Platell; N Barwood; G Dorfmann; G Makin
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 3.788

Review 4.  Systematic review of the definition and measurement of anastomotic leak after gastrointestinal surgery.

Authors:  J Bruce; Z H Krukowski; G Al-Khairy; E M Russell; K G Park
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 6.939

5.  Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after anterior resection of the rectum.

Authors:  P Matthiessen; O Hallböök; M Andersson; J Rutegård; R Sjödahl
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 3.788

6.  Dehydration is the most common indication for readmission after diverting ileostomy creation.

Authors:  Evangelos Messaris; Rishabh Sehgal; Susan Deiling; Walter A Koltun; David Stewart; Kevin McKenna; Lisa S Poritz
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 4.585

7.  Anastomotic dehiscence after resection and primary anastomosis in left-sided colonic emergencies.

Authors:  Sebastiano Biondo; David Parés; Esther Kreisler; Juan Martí Ragué; Domenico Fraccalvieri; Amador Garcia Ruiz; Eduardo Jaurrieta
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 4.585

8.  End-to-end versus end-to-side stapled anastomoses after anterior resection for rectal cancer.

Authors:  Giuseppe Brisinda; Serafino Vanella; Federica Cadeddu; Ignazio Massimo Civello; Francesco Brandara; Casimiro Nigro; Pasquale Mazzeo; Gaia Marniga; Giorgio Maria
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2009-01-01       Impact factor: 3.454

9.  The stapled gastrointestinal tract anastomosis: incidence of postoperative complications compared with the sutured anastomosis.

Authors:  J L Chassin; K M Rifkind; B Sussman; B Kassel; A Fingaret; S Drager; P S Chassin
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1978-11       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  Risk factors, short and long term outcome of anastomotic leaks in rectal cancer.

Authors:  Olof Jannasch; Tim Klinge; Ronny Otto; Costanza Chiapponi; Andrej Udelnow; Hans Lippert; Christiane J Bruns; Pawel Mroczkowski
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2015-11-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.