| Literature DB >> 32885155 |
Ming-Qian He1, Jing-Ya Wang1, Yue Wang1, Jing Sui2, Meng Zhang1, Xi Ding1, Yang Zhao1, Zi-Yi Chen1, Xiao-Xiao Ren1, Bing-Yin Shi1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: To date, there is only scare evidence characterizing the temporal features and progression of metabolic dysfunction in high-fat diet (HFD)-fed obese mice. Hence, its specific pathogenesis remains unclear.Entities:
Keywords: High-fat diet; Metabolic dysfunction; Metabolic inflammation; Obesity
Year: 2020 PMID: 32885155 PMCID: PMC7451745 DOI: 10.1016/j.cdtm.2020.06.003
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Chronic Dis Transl Med ISSN: 2095-882X
Fig. 1High-fat diet (HFD) led to progressive hyperglycemia and weight gain. (A) Weekly morning fasting body weight (FWt) measured for 21 weeks in control diet (CD)-fed and HFD-fed mice (n = 10/group). (B) Weekly morning fasting blood glucose (FBG) concentrations measured through 21 weeks in CD-fed and HFD-fed mice (n = 10/group). All data are presented as means ± SD (n = 5). Significance was determined by independent samples t-test. aP < 0.05; bP < 0.01.
Fig. 2Progressive glucose intolerance and insulin sensitivity assessed with intraperitoneal glucose tolerance testing (IPGTT) and intraperitoneal insulin tolerance testing (IPITT) in control diet (CD)-fed and High-fat diet (HFD)-fed mice. (A–C) IPGTT (2 g/kg) results (A: blood glucose values, B: the corresponding insulin secretion curves, C: Area under the curve (AUC) for the blood glucose levels) for CD and HFD-fed mice at multiple time points through 3 and 7 weeks of both diets. (D–F) IPITT (0.5 unit/kg) results (D: blood glucose values, E: glucose values expressed as percentages of the time 0 value, F: AUC for the blood glucose levels) for CD and HFD-fed mice at multiple time points through 3 and 7 weeks of both diets. All data are presented as means ± SD (n = 5). Significance was determined by independent samples t-test. aP < 0.05; bP < 0.01.
Fig. 3High-fat diet (HFD) led to progressive hyperlipidemia. The comparative serum lipid levels in two group after 5-week (A) and 9-week (B) feeding. All data are presented as means ± SD (n = 5). Significance was determined by independent samples t-test. aP < 0.05; bP < 0.01. LDL-C: low-density lipoprotein TC: total cholesterol; TG: Triglyceride; CD: control diet.
Fig. 4Dynamic changes in epididymal white adipose tissue (eWAT) over 21-week high-fat diet (HFD) feeding. Histologically quantified number of (A) adipocytes and (B) crown-like structures per mm2. In the 1st week of HFD, adipocyte size increased significantly. (C) The serum concentrations of MCP-1 in two groups after 9-week feeding. (D–L) mRNA expression levels of macrophage marker (E: F4/80), pro-inflammatory (M1) macrophage markers (D: MCP-1; F: IL6; G: TNF-α; H: iNOS), anti-inflammatory (M2) macrophage markers (I: CD206; J: Chi3l3), and genes responsible for insulin signaling (K: Resistin; L: Glut4). (M) Western blots of insulin signaling molecules (pAkt and Glut4) in eWAT. All mRNA expression data were normalized to control diet (CD) group and are presented as means ± SD (n = 5). Significance was determined by independent samples t-test. aP < 0.05; bP < 0.01.
Fig. 5Prolonged high-fat diet (HFD) feeding resulted in lipid accumulation in the liver. A significant elevation in triglyceride (TG) and cholesterol accumulation in the liver was detected at the 17th week (A) and 21st week (B). Lipid levels are presented as means ± SD (n = 5), and significance was determined by independent samples t-test. Density and integrated optical density (IOD) of red oil-stained liver sections are presented as medians with interquartile ranges, and significance was determined by Wilcoxon's rank sum test. aP < 0.05; bP < 0.01. TC: total cholesterol; CD: control diet.