Literature DB >> 28784040

The Vibrant Soundbridge® middle ear implant: A historical overview.

S Labassi1, M Beliaeff1, V Péan1, P Van de Heyning2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To present a historical overview of the Vibrant Soundbridge® (VSB) middle ear implant (MEI), since its beginning in the 1990s to date and to describe its course and contemplate what it might become in the future. HISTORY: MEIs started to take form in researchers' mind in the 1930s with the first experiment of Wilska. In the 1970s, several devices, such as the Goode and Perkins', the Maniglia's, or the Hough and Dormer's were created but remained prototypes. It is only in the 1990s the devices that emerged remained on the market. In 1994, Symphonix, Inc. was created and aimed to manufacture and commercialize its semi-implantable MEI, the VSB. The principle of the VSB lies on a direct drive of the sound to a vibratory structure of the middle ear through an electromagnetic transducer, the floating mass transducer (FMT). The particularity of the system VSB is the simplicity of the transducer which is made of both the magnet and the coil; thus, the FMT, fixed on a vibrating middle ear structure, mimics the natural movement of the ossicular chain by moving in the same direction. The goal of the VSB was to give an alternative to patients with mild-to-severe sensorineural hearing loss who could not wear hearing aids (HAs) or who were unsatisfied conventional HA users. Subsequent to Tjellström's experiment in 1997, implantations started to include etiologies such as otosclerosis, radical mastoidectomy, failed ossiculoplasty/tympanoplasty, and atresia. Nowadays, the VSB, with more than 20 years of experience, is the oldest and most used middle ear implant worldwide. It is well acknowledged that the straightforward design and reliability of the transducer have certainly contributed to the success of the device.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Floating mass transducer (FMT); Middle ear implant; Transducer; Vibrant Soundbridge; Vibrating ossicular replacement prosthesis (VORP)

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28784040     DOI: 10.1080/14670100.2017.1358913

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cochlear Implants Int        ISSN: 1467-0100


  8 in total

Review 1.  [Active hearing implants in chronic otitis media].

Authors:  S Lailach; C Müller; N Lasurashvili; H Seidler; T Zahnert
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2021-06       Impact factor: 1.284

2.  The vibrating ossicular prosthesis in children and adolescents: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Susen Lailach; Thomas Zahnert; Jan Maurer; John-Martin Hempel; Assen Koitschev; Daniela Hollfelder; Henning Frenzel; Barbara Wollenberg; Susan Arndt
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2019-09-30       Impact factor: 2.503

3.  Influence of Hearing Rehabilitation With Active Middle Ear and Bone Conduction Implants on Postural Control.

Authors:  Ingmar Seiwerth; Antonia Brylok; René Schwesig; Torsten Rahne; Laura Fröhlich; Andreas Lauenroth; Timothy E Hullar; Stefan K Plontke
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2022-05-11       Impact factor: 4.086

Review 4.  Beyond Tympanomastoidectomy: A Review of Less Common Postoperative Temporal Bone CT Findings.

Authors:  A Panda; M L Carlson; F E Diehn; J I Lane
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2020-11-12       Impact factor: 3.825

5.  Implantation of the Vibrant Soundbridge in a Case of Bilateral Malformation of the Middle and External Ear.

Authors:  Henryk Skarżyński; Łukasz Plichta; Bartłomiej Król; Katarzyna Beata Cywka; Piotr Henryk Skarżyński
Journal:  Am J Case Rep       Date:  2021-05-12

6.  Intraoperative quantification of floating mass transducer coupling quality in active middle ear implants: a multicenter study.

Authors:  Laura Fröhlich; Torsten Rahne; Stefan K Plontke; Tobias Oberhoffner; Rüdiger Dahl; Robert Mlynski; Oliver Dziemba; Aristotelis Aristeidou; Maria Gadyuchko; Sven Koscielny; Sebastian Hoth; Miriam H Kropp; Parwis Mir-Salim; Alexander Müller
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2020-09-03       Impact factor: 2.503

7.  Active Middle Ear Implant Evoked Auditory Brainstem Response Intensity-Latency Characteristics.

Authors:  Laura Fröhlich; Alexander Müller; Miriam H Kropp; Parwis Mir-Salim; Oliver Dziemba; Tobias Oberhoffner; Stefan K Plontke; Torsten Rahne
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2022-01-20       Impact factor: 4.003

8.  Results of Active Middle Ear Implantation in Patients With Mixed Hearing Loss After Middle Ear Surgery: A Prospective Multicenter Study (the ROMEO Study).

Authors:  Chan Il Song; Hyong-Ho Cho; Byung Yoon Choi; Jae Young Choi; Jin Woong Choi; Yun-Hoon Choung; Jong Woo Chung; Won-Ho Chung; Sung Hwa Hong; Yehree Kim; Byung Don Lee; Il-Woo Lee; Jong Dae Lee; Jun Ho Lee; Kyu-Yup Lee; Il Joon Moon; In Seok Moon; Seung-Ha Oh; Hong Ju Park; Shi Nae Park; Ji Won Seo
Journal:  Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2021-04-09       Impact factor: 3.372

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.