Helena Earl1,2,3, Louise Hiller4, Anne-Laure Vallier5, Shrushma Loi4, Karen McAdam6,7, Luke Hughes-Davies1,7, Daniel Rea8, Donna Howe4, Kerry Raynes4, Helen B Higgins4, Maggie Wilcox9, Chris Plummer10,11, Betania Mahler-Araujo12,13, Elena Provenzano3,12, Anita Chhabra14, Sophie Gasson4, Claire Balmer4, Jean E Abraham1,2,3, Carlos Caldas1,2,3,15, Peter Hall16, Bethany Shinkins17, Christopher McCabe18, Claire Hulme17,19, David Miles20, Andrew M Wardley21,22, David A Cameron16, Janet A Dunn4. 1. Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK. 2. Cambridge Breast Cancer Research Unit, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK. 3. NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, Cambridge, UK. 4. Warwick Clinical Trials Unit, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK. 5. Cambridge Clinical Trials Unit - Cancer Theme, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK. 6. Department of Oncology, North West Anglia NHS Foundation Trust, Peterborough City Hospital, Peterborough, UK. 7. Department of Oncology, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK. 8. Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit (CRCTU), Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK. 9. Independent Cancer Patients' Voice, London, UK. 10. Translational and Clinical Research Institute, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK. 11. Department of Cardiology, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK. 12. Department of Histopathology, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK. 13. Metabolic Research Laboratories, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK. 14. Pharmacy, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK. 15. Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK. 16. Edinburgh University Cancer Research Centre, Institute of Genetics and Molecular Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, UK. 17. Academic Unit of Health Economics, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK. 18. Institute of Health Economics, Edmonton, AB, Canada. 19. Health Economics Group, University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, UK. 20. Medical Oncology, Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, Northwood, UK. 21. NIHR Manchester Clinical Research Facility at The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK. 22. Division of Cancer Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The addition of adjuvant trastuzumab to chemotherapy has significantly improved outcomes for people with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive, early, potentially curable breast cancer. Twelve months' trastuzumab, tested in registration trials, was adopted as standard adjuvant treatment in 2006. Subsequently, similar outcomes were demonstrated using 9 weeks of trastuzumab. Shorter durations were therefore tested for non-inferiority. OBJECTIVES: To establish whether or not 6 months' adjuvant trastuzumab is non-inferior to 12 months' in the treatment of HER2-positive early breast cancer using a primary end point of 4-year disease-free survival. DESIGN: This was a Phase III randomised controlled non-inferiority trial. SETTING: The setting was 152 NHS hospitals. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 4088 patients with HER2-positive early breast cancer who it was planned would receive both chemotherapy and trastuzumab took part. INTERVENTION: Randomisation (1 : 1) to 6 months' or 12 months' trastuzumab treatment. MAIN OUTCOMES: The primary end point was disease-free survival. The secondary end points were overall survival, cost-effectiveness and cardiac function during treatment with trastuzumab. Assuming a 4-year disease-free survival rate of 80% with 12 months' trastuzumab, 4000 patients were required to demonstrate non-inferiority of 6 months' trastuzumab (5% one-sided significance, 85% power), defining the non-inferiority limit as no worse than 3% below the standard arm. Costs and quality-adjusted life-years were estimated using a within-trial analysis and a lifetime decision-analytic model. RESULTS:Between 4 October 2007 and 31 July 2015, 2045 patients were randomised to 12 months' trastuzumab and 2043 were randomised to 6 months' trastuzumab. Sixty-nine per cent of patients had ER-positive disease; 90% received anthracyclines (49% with taxanes; 41% without taxanes); 10% received taxanes without anthracyclines; 54% received trastuzumab sequentially after chemotherapy; and 85% received adjuvant chemotherapy (58% were node negative). At 6.1 years' median follow-up, with 389 (10%) deaths and 566 (14%) disease-free survival events, the 4-year disease-free survival rates for the 4088 patients were 89.5% (95% confidence interval 88.1% to 90.8%) in the 6-month group and 90.3% (95% confidence interval 88.9% to 91.5%) in the 12-month group (hazard ratio 1.10, 90% confidence interval 0.96 to 1.26; non-inferiority p = 0.01), demonstrating non-inferiority of 6 months' trastuzumab. Congruent results were found for overall survival (non-inferiority p = 0.0003) and landmark analyses 6 months from starting trastuzumab [non-inferiority p = 0.03 (disease-free-survival) and p = 0.006 (overall survival)]. Six months' trastuzumab resulted in fewer patients reporting adverse events of severe grade [365/1929 (19%) vs. 460/1935 (24%) for 12-month patients; p = 0.0003] or stopping early because of cardiotoxicity [61/1977 (3%) vs. 146/1941 (8%) for 12-month patients; p < 0.0001]. Health economic analysis showed that 6 months' trastuzumab resulted in significantly lower lifetime costs than and similar lifetime quality-adjusted life-years to 12 months' trastuzumab, and thus there is a high probability that 6 months' trastuzumab is cost-effective compared with 12 months' trastuzumab. Patient-reported experiences in the trial highlighted fatigue and aches and pains most frequently. LIMITATIONS: The type of chemotherapy and timing of trastuzumab changed during the recruitment phase of the study as standard practice altered. CONCLUSIONS: PERSEPHONE demonstrated that, in the treatment of HER2-positive early breast cancer, 6 months' adjuvant trastuzumab is non-inferior to 12 months'. Six months' treatment resulted in significantly less cardiac toxicity and fewer severe adverse events. FUTURE WORK: Ongoing translational work investigates patient and tumour genetic determinants of toxicity, and trastuzumab efficacy. An individual patient data meta-analysis with PHARE and other trastuzumab duration trials is planned. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN52968807, EudraCT 2006-007018-39 and ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00712140. FUNDING: This project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme and will be published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 24, No. 40. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: The addition of adjuvant trastuzumab to chemotherapy has significantly improved outcomes for people with humanepidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive, early, potentially curable breast cancer. Twelve months' trastuzumab, tested in registration trials, was adopted as standard adjuvant treatment in 2006. Subsequently, similar outcomes were demonstrated using 9 weeks of trastuzumab. Shorter durations were therefore tested for non-inferiority. OBJECTIVES: To establish whether or not 6 months' adjuvant trastuzumab is non-inferior to 12 months' in the treatment of HER2-positive early breast cancer using a primary end point of 4-year disease-free survival. DESIGN: This was a Phase III randomised controlled non-inferiority trial. SETTING: The setting was 152 NHS hospitals. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 4088 patients with HER2-positive early breast cancer who it was planned would receive both chemotherapy and trastuzumab took part. INTERVENTION: Randomisation (1 : 1) to 6 months' or 12 months' trastuzumab treatment. MAIN OUTCOMES: The primary end point was disease-free survival. The secondary end points were overall survival, cost-effectiveness and cardiac function during treatment with trastuzumab. Assuming a 4-year disease-free survival rate of 80% with 12 months' trastuzumab, 4000 patients were required to demonstrate non-inferiority of 6 months' trastuzumab (5% one-sided significance, 85% power), defining the non-inferiority limit as no worse than 3% below the standard arm. Costs and quality-adjusted life-years were estimated using a within-trial analysis and a lifetime decision-analytic model. RESULTS: Between 4 October 2007 and 31 July 2015, 2045 patients were randomised to 12 months' trastuzumab and 2043 were randomised to 6 months' trastuzumab. Sixty-nine per cent of patients had ER-positive disease; 90% received anthracyclines (49% with taxanes; 41% without taxanes); 10% received taxanes without anthracyclines; 54% received trastuzumab sequentially after chemotherapy; and 85% received adjuvant chemotherapy (58% were node negative). At 6.1 years' median follow-up, with 389 (10%) deaths and 566 (14%) disease-free survival events, the 4-year disease-free survival rates for the 4088 patients were 89.5% (95% confidence interval 88.1% to 90.8%) in the 6-month group and 90.3% (95% confidence interval 88.9% to 91.5%) in the 12-month group (hazard ratio 1.10, 90% confidence interval 0.96 to 1.26; non-inferiority p = 0.01), demonstrating non-inferiority of 6 months' trastuzumab. Congruent results were found for overall survival (non-inferiority p = 0.0003) and landmark analyses 6 months from starting trastuzumab [non-inferiority p = 0.03 (disease-free-survival) and p = 0.006 (overall survival)]. Six months' trastuzumab resulted in fewer patients reporting adverse events of severe grade [365/1929 (19%) vs. 460/1935 (24%) for 12-month patients; p = 0.0003] or stopping early because of cardiotoxicity [61/1977 (3%) vs. 146/1941 (8%) for 12-month patients; p < 0.0001]. Health economic analysis showed that 6 months' trastuzumab resulted in significantly lower lifetime costs than and similar lifetime quality-adjusted life-years to 12 months' trastuzumab, and thus there is a high probability that 6 months' trastuzumab is cost-effective compared with 12 months' trastuzumab. Patient-reported experiences in the trial highlighted fatigue and aches and pains most frequently. LIMITATIONS: The type of chemotherapy and timing of trastuzumab changed during the recruitment phase of the study as standard practice altered. CONCLUSIONS: PERSEPHONE demonstrated that, in the treatment of HER2-positive early breast cancer, 6 months' adjuvant trastuzumab is non-inferior to 12 months'. Six months' treatment resulted in significantly less cardiac toxicity and fewer severe adverse events. FUTURE WORK: Ongoing translational work investigates patient and tumour genetic determinants of toxicity, and trastuzumab efficacy. An individual patient data meta-analysis with PHARE and other trastuzumab duration trials is planned. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN52968807, EudraCT 2006-007018-39 and ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00712140. FUNDING: This project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme and will be published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 24, No. 40. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.
Entities:
Keywords:
ADJUVANT AND NEOADJUVANT THERAPY; DISEASE-FREE SURVIVAL; EARLY BREAST CANCER; HER2-POSITIVE; TRASTUZUMAB DURATION
Authors: Stuart D Russell; Kimberly L Blackwell; Julia Lawrence; John E Pippen; Matthew T Roe; Freda Wood; Virginia Paton; Eric Holmgren; Kenneth W Mahaffey Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2010-06-07 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Sara M Tolaney; Hao Guo; Sonia Pernas; William T Barry; Deborah A Dillon; Lauren Ritterhouse; Bryan P Schneider; Fei Shen; Kit Fuhrman; Michele Baltay; Chau T Dang; Denise A Yardley; Beverly Moy; P Kelly Marcom; Kathy S Albain; Hope S Rugo; Mathew J Ellis; Iuliana Shapira; Antonio C Wolff; Lisa A Carey; Beth Overmoyer; Ann H Partridge; Clifford A Hudis; Ian E Krop; Harold J Burstein; Eric P Winer Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2019-04-02 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Edith A Perez; Vera J Suman; Nancy E Davidson; Julie R Gralow; Peter A Kaufman; Daniel W Visscher; Beiyun Chen; James N Ingle; Shaker R Dakhil; Joanne Zujewski; Alvaro Moreno-Aspitia; Thomas M Pisansky; Robert B Jenkins Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2011-10-31 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Clifford A Hudis; William E Barlow; Joseph P Costantino; Robert J Gray; Kathleen I Pritchard; Judith-Anne W Chapman; Joseph A Sparano; Sally Hunsberger; Rebecca A Enos; Richard D Gelber; Jo Anne Zujewski Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2007-05-20 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: H M Earl; L Hiller; J Dunn; I Macpherson; D Rea; L Hughes-Davies; K McAdam; P Hall; J Mansi; D Wheatley; J E Abraham; C Caldas; S Gasson; E O'Riordan; M Wilcox; D Miles; D A Cameron; A Wardley Journal: Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) Date: 2020-07-25 Impact factor: 4.126