Literature DB >> 32879870

Resident Behaviours to Prioritize According to Canadian Plastic Surgeons.

Peter Mankowski1, Daniel Demsey1, Erin Brown1, Aaron Knox2.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Many articles have been published outlining the resident selection process for plastic surgery training programs. However, which qualities Canadian plastic surgeons value most in their current residents remains unclear. A national survey study was conducted to identify which attributes surgeons associate with the highest resident performance and which behaviours trainees should prioritize during their training.
METHODS: A literature review was performed to identify studies that documented attributes valued in plastic surgery applicants and characteristics of high-performing surgical residents. These qualities were extracted to construct a survey consisting of both ranking and open-ended questions. After an iterative review process, the survey was disseminated nationally to consultants and trainees of Canadian plastic surgery training programs.
RESULTS: Survey responses were obtained from 120 invitees and a weighted rank was calculated for each evaluated attribute. The terms integrity, professional, and work ethic were viewed as the most important attributes prized by surgeons. Dishonesty, lack of dependability, and unprofessionalism were viewed as the most concerning behaviours. Additionally, disinterest and arrogance were identified by the open-ended questions as behaviours surgeons would like to see less frequently in their trainees. When compared to surgeons, trainees undervalued the importance of knowledge and the impact of unprofessional behaviour.
CONCLUSIONS: With the multiple roles that a resident must fulfill, understanding which attributes are of the most importance will help focus self-directed learning and development within residency programs. Ultimately, instilling the importance of integrity and professionalism is most highly valued by members of the Canadian plastic surgery community.
© 2020 The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  clinical competence; education; internship and residency; plastic; professionalism; surgery

Year:  2020        PMID: 32879870      PMCID: PMC7436847          DOI: 10.1177/2292550320903424

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plast Surg (Oakv)        ISSN: 2292-5503            Impact factor:   0.947


  30 in total

1.  Resident selection protocols in plastic surgery: a national survey of plastic surgery independent program directors.

Authors:  Alexander T Nguyen; Jeffrey E Janis
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 4.730

2.  Outcome analysis of factors impacting the plastic surgery match.

Authors:  Jeyhan S Wood; Lisa R David
Journal:  Ann Plast Surg       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 1.539

3.  Selecting the best and brightest: A comparison of residency match processes in the United States and Canada.

Authors:  E M Krauss; M Bezuhly; J G Williams
Journal:  Plast Surg (Oakv)       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 0.947

4.  Selection criteria for the integrated model of plastic surgery residency.

Authors:  Jeffrey R LaGrasso; Debbie A Kennedy; James G Hoehn; Salmon Ashruf; Adrian M Przybyla
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 4.730

5.  The nature of general surgery resident performance problems.

Authors:  Reed G Williams; Nicole K Roberts; Cathy J Schwind; Gary L Dunnington
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 3.982

6.  The independent plastic surgery match: an in-depth analysis of the applicants and process.

Authors:  J Garrett Harper; Kenna S Given; Barbara Pettitt; Albert Losken
Journal:  Ann Plast Surg       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 1.539

7.  Factors used by program directors to select hand surgery fellows.

Authors:  Matthew S Nies; Alexander J Bollinger; Charles Cassidy; Peter J L Jebson
Journal:  J Hand Surg Am       Date:  2014-08-29       Impact factor: 2.230

8.  Improving applicant selection: identifying qualities of the unsuccessful otolaryngology resident.

Authors:  Karam W Badran; Kanwar Kelley; Christian Conderman; Hossein Mahboubi; William B Armstrong; Naveen D Bhandarkar
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2014-08-05       Impact factor: 3.325

9.  An evaluation of plastic surgery resident selection factors.

Authors:  Fan Liang; Pamela A Rudnicki; Noah H Prince; Stuart Lipsitz; James W May; Lifei Guo
Journal:  J Surg Educ       Date:  2014-09-11       Impact factor: 2.891

Review 10.  Objective Assessment of General Surgery Residents Followed by Remediation.

Authors:  Becca L Gas; EeeLN H Buckarma; Monali Mohan; T K Pandian; David R Farley
Journal:  J Surg Educ       Date:  2016-07-29       Impact factor: 2.891

View more
  2 in total

1.  The Death of Expertise.

Authors:  Mirko S Gilardino; Richard J Warren; Jugpal S Arneja
Journal:  Plast Surg (Oakv)       Date:  2022-09-21       Impact factor: 0.558

2.  The Ideal Applicant to the Saudi Plastic Surgery Residency Program.

Authors:  Qutaiba N M Shah Mardan; Nouf A Alamari; Hatan M Alzahrani; Mohammed A Almarghoub; Nouf A Al Saud; Moraya S Alqahtani
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2021-02-18
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.