Literature DB >> 32875373

Patient outcomes, patient experiences and process indicators associated with the routine use of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in cancer care: a systematic review.

Caitlin Graupner1,2, Merel L Kimman3, Suzanne Mul4, Annerika H M Slok5, Danny Claessens5, Jos Kleijnen6,7, Carmen D Dirksen3, Stéphanie O Breukink4,8.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: In current cancer care, there is a growing debate about the value of using patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in daily clinical follow-up. A systematic review of the literature was conducted to assess the evidence of the effectiveness of the routine use of PROMs in daily cancer care in terms of patient outcomes, patient experiences and process indicators and to identify the effect of giving feedback about PROM findings to patients and/or health care professionals (HCPs).
METHODS: A systematic search was performed. Studies were eligible for inclusion when they (1) used a PROM as an intervention, with or without feedback to patients and/or HCPs, compared with not using a PROM, and (2) used a PROM as an intervention with feedback to patients and/or HCPs, compared with using a PROM without giving feedback to patients and/or HCPs.
RESULTS: After screening of 8341 references, 22 original studies met the inclusion criteria. Most studies found a positive effect on survival, symptoms, HRQoL and patient satisfaction. In general, using feedback to patient and/or HCPs about the PROM results led to better symptom control, HRQoL, patient satisfaction and patient-doctor communication. The majority of included studies had insufficient power to detect significant differences in the outcomes assessed.
CONCLUSION: This review shows that predominantly positive findings were found in the use of a PROM in daily cancer care. Additionally, more positive effects were seen when feedback is provided to patient and/or health care professionals, and it is thus highly recommended that this is always done.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cancer; PROM; Patient-reported outcome measures; Patient-reported outcomes

Year:  2020        PMID: 32875373      PMCID: PMC7767901          DOI: 10.1007/s00520-020-05695-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Support Care Cancer        ISSN: 0941-4355            Impact factor:   3.603


  49 in total

1.  Impact of computerized quality of life screening on physician behaviour and patient satisfaction in lung cancer outpatients.

Authors:  P Taenzer; B D Bultz; L E Carlson; M Speca; T DeGagne; K Olson; R Doll; Z Rosberger
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2000 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.894

2.  Does routine assessment and real-time feedback improve cancer patients' psychosocial well-being?

Authors:  A Boyes; S Newell; A Girgis; P McElduff; R Sanson-Fisher
Journal:  Eur J Cancer Care (Engl)       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 2.520

Review 3.  Palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia (PPE): a literature review with commentary on experience in a cancer centre.

Authors:  Joan D Webster-Gandy; Chris How; Karen Harrold
Journal:  Eur J Oncol Nurs       Date:  2007-03-09       Impact factor: 2.398

4.  Symptoms and treatment burden associated with cancer treatment: results from a cross-sectional national survey in the U.S.

Authors:  David H Henry; Hema N Viswanathan; Eric P Elkin; Shana Traina; Shawn Wade; David Cella
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2008-01-17       Impact factor: 3.603

5.  Use of health-related quality-of-life assessments in daily clinical oncology nursing practice: a community hospital-based intervention study.

Authors:  Doranne L Hilarius; Paul H Kloeg; Chad M Gundy; Neil K Aaronson
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2008-08-01       Impact factor: 6.860

6.  Electronic real-time assessment of patient-reported outcomes in routine care-first findings and experiences from the implementation in a comprehensive cancer center.

Authors:  Freya Trautmann; Leopold Hentschel; Beate Hornemann; Anke Rentsch; Michael Baumann; Gerhard Ehninger; Jochen Schmitt; Markus Schuler
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2016-02-18       Impact factor: 3.603

7.  Does a patient-held quality-of-life diary benefit patients with inoperable lung cancer?

Authors:  Moyra E Mills; Liam J Murray; Brian T Johnston; Chris Cardwell; Michael Donnelly
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2008-11-24       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  Assessment is not enough: a randomized controlled trial of the effects of HRQL assessment on quality of life and satisfaction in oncology clinical practice.

Authors:  Sarah K Rosenbloom; David E Victorson; Elizabeth A Hahn; Amy H Peterman; David Cella
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 3.894

9.  An International Collaborative Standardizing a Comprehensive Patient-Centered Outcomes Measurement Set for Colorectal Cancer.

Authors:  Jessica A Zerillo; Maartje G Schouwenburg; Annelotte C M van Bommel; Caleb Stowell; Jacob Lippa; Donna Bauer; Ann M Berger; Gilles Boland; Josep M Borras; Mary K Buss; Robert Cima; Eric Van Cutsem; Eino B van Duyn; Samuel R G Finlayson; Skye Hung-Chun Cheng; Corinna Langelotz; John Lloyd; Andrew C Lynch; Harvey J Mamon; Pamela K McAllister; Bruce D Minsky; Joanne Ngeow; Muhammad R Abu Hassan; Kim Ryan; Veena Shankaran; Melissa P Upton; John Zalcberg; Cornelis J van de Velde; Rob Tollenaar
Journal:  JAMA Oncol       Date:  2017-05-01       Impact factor: 31.777

10.  The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials.

Authors:  Julian P T Higgins; Douglas G Altman; Peter C Gøtzsche; Peter Jüni; David Moher; Andrew D Oxman; Jelena Savovic; Kenneth F Schulz; Laura Weeks; Jonathan A C Sterne
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2011-10-18
View more
  13 in total

1.  Factors associated with worsening sexual function during adjuvant endocrine therapy in a prospective clinic-based cohort of women with early-stage breast cancer.

Authors:  Neha Verma; Amanda L Blackford; Elissa Thorner; Jennifer Lehman; Claire Snyder; Vered Stearns; Karen Lisa Smith
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2022-10-05       Impact factor: 4.624

2.  An implementation study of electronic assessment of patient-reported outcomes in inpatient radiation oncology.

Authors:  Thomas Nordhausen; Katharina Lampe; Dirk Vordermark; Bernhard Holzner; Haifa-Kathrin Al-Ali; Gabriele Meyer; Heike Schmidt
Journal:  J Patient Rep Outcomes       Date:  2022-07-19

Review 3.  Patient reported outcomes in oncology: changing perspectives-a systematic review.

Authors:  Augusta Silveira; Teresa Sequeira; Joaquim Gonçalves; Pedro Lopes Ferreira
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2022-05-21       Impact factor: 3.077

4.  Patient-reported outcome measures in oncology: a qualitative study of the healthcare professional's perspective.

Authors:  Caitlin Graupner; S O Breukink; S Mul; D Claessens; A H M Slok; M L Kimman
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2021-03-02       Impact factor: 3.603

5.  Experiences of patients who developed oral mucositis during solid neoplasms treatment: a Ugandan qualitative study.

Authors:  Adriane Kamulegeya; Damalie Nakanjako; Jackson Orem; Harriet Mayanja-Kizza
Journal:  J Patient Rep Outcomes       Date:  2021-03-06

6.  Health-Related Quality of Life of Children and Adolescents With Congenital Hyperinsulinism - A Scoping Review.

Authors:  Kaja Kristensen; Julia Quitmann; Stefanie Witt
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2021-12-03       Impact factor: 5.555

Review 7.  Patient-centred care in thoracic surgery: a holistic approach-A review of the subjects of enhanced recovery after surgery, rehabilitation, pain management and patient-reported outcome measures in thoracic surgery.

Authors:  Alessandro Brunelli; Shanda H Blackmon; Mert Sentürk; Vinicius Cavalheri; Cecilia Pompili
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2022-02       Impact factor: 2.895

8.  Feasibility of a Digital Patient-Provider Communication Intervention to Support Shared Decision-Making in Chronic Health Care, InvolveMe: Pilot Study.

Authors:  Berit Seljelid; Cecilie Varsi; Lise Solberg Nes; Kristin Astrid Øystese; Elin Børøsund
Journal:  JMIR Form Res       Date:  2022-04-07

9.  Using Process Indicators to Monitor Documentation of Patient-Centred Variables in an Integrated Oncology and Palliative Care Pathway-Results from a Cluster Randomized Trial.

Authors:  Marianne Jensen Hjermstad; Julian Hamfjord; Nina Aass; Olav Dajani; Tonje Lundeby; Torunn Wester; Stein Kaasa
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-03       Impact factor: 6.639

10.  Using the MDASI-Adolescent for Early Symptom Identification and Mitigation of Symptom Impact on Daily Living in Adolescent and Young Adult Stem Cell Transplant Patients.

Authors:  Irtiza N Sheikh; Jeffrey Miller; Basirat Shoberu; Clark R Andersen; Jian Wang; Loretta A Williams; Kris M Mahadeo; Rhonda Robert
Journal:  Children (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-29
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.