OBJECTIVE: This work examines the claim made in the literature that the inverse problem associated with image reconstruction in sparse-view computed tomography (CT) can be solved with a convolutional neural network (CNN). METHODS: Training, and testing image/data pairs are generated in a dedicated breast CT simulation for sparse-view sampling, using two different object models. The trained CNN is tested to see if images can be accurately recovered from their corresponding sparse-view data. For reference, the same sparse-view CT data is reconstructed by the use of constrained total-variation (TV) minimization (TVmin), which exploits sparsity in the gradient magnitude image (GMI). RESULTS: There is a significant discrepancy between the image obtained with the CNN and the image that generated the data. TVmin is able to accurately reconstruct the test images. CONCLUSION: We find that the sparse-view CT inverse problem cannot be solved for the particular published CNN-based methodology that we chose, and the particular object model that we tested. SIGNIFICANCE: The inability of the CNN to solve the inverse problem associated with sparse-view CT, for the specific conditions of the presented simulation, draws into question similar unsupported claims being made for the use of CNNs and deep-learning to solve inverse problems in medical imaging.
OBJECTIVE: This work examines the claim made in the literature that the inverse problem associated with image reconstruction in sparse-view computed tomography (CT) can be solved with a convolutional neural network (CNN). METHODS: Training, and testing image/data pairs are generated in a dedicated breast CT simulation for sparse-view sampling, using two different object models. The trained CNN is tested to see if images can be accurately recovered from their corresponding sparse-view data. For reference, the same sparse-view CT data is reconstructed by the use of constrained total-variation (TV) minimization (TVmin), which exploits sparsity in the gradient magnitude image (GMI). RESULTS: There is a significant discrepancy between the image obtained with the CNN and the image that generated the data. TVmin is able to accurately reconstruct the test images. CONCLUSION: We find that the sparse-view CT inverse problem cannot be solved for the particular published CNN-based methodology that we chose, and the particular object model that we tested. SIGNIFICANCE: The inability of the CNN to solve the inverse problem associated with sparse-view CT, for the specific conditions of the presented simulation, draws into question similar unsupported claims being made for the use of CNNs and deep-learning to solve inverse problems in medical imaging.
Authors: Zheng Zhang; Sean Rose; Jinghan Ye; Amy E Perkins; Buxin Chen; Chien-Min Kao; Emil Y Sidky; Chi-Hua Tung; Xiaochuan Pan Journal: IEEE Trans Biomed Eng Date: 2018-04 Impact factor: 4.538