Literature DB >> 23737689

A comparison of patient knowledge of clinical trials and trialist priorities.

P Cameron1, G R Pond, R Y Xu, P M Ellis, J R Goffin.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Recruitment to clinical trials remains poor, and patient knowledge of clinical trials is one barrier to recruitment. To identify knowledge deficits, we conducted and compared surveys measuring actual patient knowledge and clinical trialist priorities for patient knowledge.
METHODS: Consenting patients at a tertiary cancer centre answered a survey that included 2 opinion questions about their own knowledge and willingness to join a trial, and22 knowledge questions. Clinical researchers at the centre were asked 13 questions about the importance of various trials factors.
RESULTS: Of 126 patients surveyed, 16% had joined a clinical trial, and 42% had a secondary school education or less. The mean correct response rate on the knowledge questions was 58%. Higher rates of correct responses were associated with lower age (p = 0.05), greater education (p = 0.006), prior trial participation (p < 0.001), agreement or strong agreement with perceived understanding of trials (p < 0.001), and willingness to join a clinical trial (p = 0.002). Trialists valued an understanding of the rationale for clinical trials and of randomization, placebo, and patient protection, but those particular topics were poorly understood by patients.
CONCLUSIONS: Patient knowledge about clinical trials is poor, including knowledge of several concepts ranked important by clinical trialists. The findings suggest that when developing education interventions, emphasis should be placed on the topics most directly related to patient care, and factors such as age and education level should be considered.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Clinical trials; education; knowledge; recruitment; surveys

Year:  2013        PMID: 23737689      PMCID: PMC3671026          DOI: 10.3747/co.20.1323

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Oncol        ISSN: 1198-0052            Impact factor:   3.677


  23 in total

1.  Factors associated with participation in breast cancer treatment clinical trials.

Authors:  Nancy E Avis; Kevin W Smith; Carol L Link; Gabriel N Hortobagyi; Edgardo Rivera
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2006-04-20       Impact factor: 44.544

2.  What do they know?: a content analysis of women's perceptions of trial information.

Authors:  Sara Kenyon; Mary Dixon-Woods
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 6.531

3.  Attitudes towards clinical research among cancer trial participants and non-participants: an interview study using a Grounded Theory approach.

Authors:  S M Madsen; S Holm; P Riis
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 2.903

4.  Does increased patient awareness improve accrual into cancer-related clinical trials?

Authors:  Carla R Stiles; Laureen Johnson; Darlene Whyte; Tevi Helland Nergaard; Jane Gardner; Jackson Wu
Journal:  Cancer Nurs       Date:  2011 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.592

5.  Do cancer patients fully understand clinical trial participation? A pilot study to assess informed consent and patient expectations.

Authors:  Ricardo J Wray; Jo Ellen Stryker; Eric Winer; George Demetri; Karen M Emmons
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 2.037

6.  An educational video to increase clinical trials enrollment among lung cancer patients.

Authors:  Wei Du; Darlene Mood; Shirish Gadgeel; Michael S Simon
Journal:  J Thorac Oncol       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 15.609

7.  The guinea pig syndrome: improving clinical trial participation among thoracic patients.

Authors:  Gwendolyn P Quinn; Bethany A Bell; Miriam Y Bell; Vicki D Caraway; Diane Conforte; Linda B Graci; Valerie L Powell-Stafford; Amber L Sapp; Cynthia O Shimizu; Elizabeth J Vaughn; Charles Williams; Gerold Bepler
Journal:  J Thorac Oncol       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 15.609

Review 8.  Audio-visual presentation of information for informed consent for participation in clinical trials.

Authors:  R E Ryan; M J Prictor; K J McLaughlin; S J Hill
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2008-01-23

9.  The impact of an educational DVD on cancer patients considering participation in a phase I clinical trial.

Authors:  Elizabeth L Strevel; Colin Newman; Gregory R Pond; Martha MacLean; Lillian L Siu
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 3.359

10.  A randomised controlled study of an audiovisual patient information intervention on informed consent and recruitment to cancer clinical trials.

Authors:  C Hutchison; C Cowan; T McMahon; J Paul
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2007-09-17       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  14 in total

1.  Characteristics of clinical trials that require participants to be fluent in English.

Authors:  Brian L Egleston; Omar Pedraza; Yu-Ning Wong; Roland L Dunbrack; Candace L Griffin; Eric A Ross; J Robert Beck
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2015-07-07       Impact factor: 2.486

2.  Untangling interactivity's effects: The role of cognitive absorption, perceived visual informativeness, and cancer information overload.

Authors:  Aurora Occa; Susan E Morgan; Wei Peng; Bingjing Mao; Soroya Julian McFarlane; Kim Grinfeder; Margaret Byrne
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2020-10-13

3.  Knowledge and attitudes regarding medical research studies among patients with breast cancer and gynecological diseases.

Authors:  Michael P Lux; Thomas Hildebrandt; Sandra-Maria Knetzger; Michael G Schrauder; Sebastian M Jud; Alexander Hein; Claudia Rauh; Peter A Fasching; Matthias W Beckmann; Falk C Thiel
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2015-08-14       Impact factor: 4.430

4.  Placebo-controlled clinical trials: how trial documents justify the use of randomisation and placebo.

Authors:  Tapani Keränen; Arja Halkoaho; Emmi Itkonen; Anna-Maija Pietilä
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2015-01-11       Impact factor: 2.652

5.  What do adult outpatients included in clinical trials know about the investigational drugs being assessed: A cross-sectional study in France.

Authors:  Clémentine Fronteau; Maxime Paré; Philippe Benoit; Sophie Tollec; Catherine Hamon; Vérane Schwiertz; Christian Maillard; Amélie Cransac; Christelle Volteau; Jean-François Huon; Véronique Burgeot; Martine Tching-Sin; Corinne Guérin; Laurent Flet
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-08-13       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Knowledge, Attitudes and Perceptions of Saudis towards Participating in Clinical Trials.

Authors:  Mohamad A Al-Tannir; Nahid El-Bakri; Amani K Abu-Shaheen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-02-05       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Reducing attrition within clinical trials: The communication of retention and withdrawal within patient information leaflets.

Authors:  Anna Kearney; Anna Rosala-Hallas; Naomi Bacon; Anne Daykin; Alison R G Shaw; Athene J Lane; Jane M Blazeby; Mike Clarke; Paula R Williamson; Carrol Gamble
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-10-31       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Participant perception, still a major challenge to clinical research in developing countries-A mixed methods study.

Authors:  Wafaa Binti Mowlabaccus; Abha Jodheea-Jutton
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-07-30       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Clinical trials: Predictors of knowledge and attitudes towards participation.

Authors:  Oriana Awwad; Sajeda Maaiah; Basima A Almomani
Journal:  Int J Clin Pract       Date:  2020-09-21       Impact factor: 2.503

10.  Tailored Messages About Research Participation: Using an Interactive Information Aid to Improve Study Recruitment.

Authors:  Susan E Morgan; Wei Peng; Aurora Occa; Bingjing Mao; Soroya McFarlane; Gilles Grinfeder; Barbara Millet; Margaret M Byrne
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2022-02       Impact factor: 1.771

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.