Literature DB >> 32870390

Cellular responses to deproteinized bovine bone mineral biofunctionalized with bone-conditioned medium.

Ludovica Parisi1,2,3,4, Daniel Buser2, Vivianne Chappuis2, Maria B Asparuhova5,6.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The aim of the study was to investigate whether the osteoinductive properties of bone-conditioned medium (BCM) harvested from cortical bone chips within a clinically relevant short-term period can enhance the biologic characteristics of deproteinized bovine bone mineral (DBBM) in vitro.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: To assess the biofunctionalization of DBBM, the adhesive, proliferative, and differentiation properties of mesenchymal stromal ST2, pre-osteoblastic MC3T3-E1, and primary bone-derived cells grown on BCM-coated DBBM were examined by crystal violet staining of adherent cells, BrdU ELISA, and qRT-PCR, respectively.
RESULTS: BCM extracted within 20 min or 24 h in either Ringer's solution (BCM-RS) or RS mixed with autologous serum (BCM-RS + S) increased the adhesive properties of all three cell types seeded on DBBM. The 20-min BCM-RS preparation appeared more potent than the 24-h preparation. BCM-RS made within 20 min or 24 h had strong pro-proliferative effects on all cell types grown on DBBM. RS + S alone exhibited a considerable pro-proliferative effect, suggesting an impact of the serum on cellular growth. DBBM coated with BCM-RS or BCM-RS + S, made within 20 min or 24 h each, caused a significant induction of osteogenic differentiation marker expression with a higher potency of the BCM-RS + S. Finally, a strong additive effect of fresh bone chips combined with BCM-coated DBBM on the osteogenic differentiation of the three cell types was observed.
CONCLUSIONS: Altogether, the data strongly support the biofunctionalization of DBBM with BCM extracted within a clinically relevant time window of 20 min. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Pre-activation of non-osteoinductive biomaterials with BCM, prepared from autologous bone chips during a guided bone regeneration (GBR) procedure, bears the potential of an optimal treatment modality for bone defects in daily practice.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Autologous bone; Bone augmentation; Bone substitute; Gene expression; Growth factors; Osteogenesis

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32870390      PMCID: PMC7966141          DOI: 10.1007/s00784-020-03528-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Oral Investig        ISSN: 1432-6981            Impact factor:   3.573


  62 in total

1.  Conditioned medium from fresh and demineralized bone enhances osteoclastogenesis in murine bone marrow cultures.

Authors:  Jordi Caballé-Serrano; Guenther Schuldt Filho; Dieter D Bosshardt; Jordi Gargallo-Albiol; Daniel Buser; Reinhard Gruber
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2015-03-06       Impact factor: 5.977

Review 2.  A review of bone substitutes.

Authors:  Solon T Kao; Daniel D Scott
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 2.802

3.  Long-term stability of early implant placement with contour augmentation.

Authors:  D Buser; V Chappuis; U Kuchler; M M Bornstein; J G Wittneben; R Buser; Y Cavusoglu; U C Belser
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  2013-10-24       Impact factor: 6.116

4.  Autogenous bone harvest for implant reconstruction.

Authors:  Avichai Stern; Golaleh Barzani
Journal:  Dent Clin North Am       Date:  2015-01-02

5.  Conditioned medium of demineralized freeze-dried bone activates gene expression in periodontal fibroblasts in vitro.

Authors:  Guenther Schuldt Filho; Jordi Caballé-Serrano; Kosaku Sawada; Dieter D Bosshardt; Marco Aurélio Bianchini; Daniel Buser; Reinhard Gruber
Journal:  J Periodontol       Date:  2015-03-19       Impact factor: 6.993

6.  Histologic analysis of clinical biopsies taken 6 months and 3 years after maxillary sinus floor augmentation with 80% bovine hydroxyapatite and 20% autogenous bone mixed with fibrin glue.

Authors:  M Hallman; S Lundgren; L Sennerby
Journal:  Clin Implant Dent Relat Res       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 3.932

7.  Morbidity of harvesting of retromolar bone grafts: a prospective study.

Authors:  Emeka Nkenke; Martin Radespiel-Tröger; Jörg Wiltfang; Stefan Schultze-Mosgau; Gerhard Winkler; Friedrich Wilhelm Neukam
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 5.977

Review 8.  Bone augmentation procedures in implant dentistry.

Authors:  Matteo Chiapasco; Paolo Casentini; Marco Zaniboni
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 2.804

9.  Donor site morbidity in two different approaches to anterior iliac crest bone harvesting.

Authors:  Giovanni Cricchio; Stefan Lundgren
Journal:  Clin Implant Dent Relat Res       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 3.932

Review 10.  Bone substitutes in orthopaedic surgery: from basic science to clinical practice.

Authors:  V Campana; G Milano; E Pagano; M Barba; C Cicione; G Salonna; W Lattanzi; G Logroscino
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2014-05-28       Impact factor: 3.896

View more
  2 in total

1.  Activation of Human Osteoblasts via Different Bovine Bone Substitute Materials With and Without Injectable Platelet Rich Fibrin in vitro.

Authors:  Solomiya Kyyak; Sebastian Blatt; Eik Schiegnitz; Diana Heimes; Henning Staedt; Daniel G E Thiem; Keyvan Sagheb; Bilal Al-Nawas; Peer W Kämmerer
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2021-02-17

2.  Testosterone Enanthate: An In Vitro Study of the Effects Triggered in MG-63 Cells.

Authors:  Benedetta Ghezzi; Ludovica Parisi; Elena Calciolari; Andrea Toffoli; Biagio Matera; Simone Lumetti; Giovanni Passeri; Guido Maria Macaluso
Journal:  Biomolecules       Date:  2022-08-21
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.