Literature DB >> 14575632

Donor site morbidity in two different approaches to anterior iliac crest bone harvesting.

Giovanni Cricchio1, Stefan Lundgren.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Bone grafting is a surgical technique for the reconstruction of the atrophic edentulous maxilla prior to treatment with endosseous implants. The anterior iliac crest is a commonly used donor site.
PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the donor site morbidity and complications when harvesting corticocancellous bone from the medial table of the anterior iliac crest and compare this with results when bone was harvested from the lateral and superior table of the anterior iliac crest. In addition, the outcome of the oral rehabilitation was evaluated by means of a quality-of-life questionnaire.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study was composed of 70 consecutively treated patients with a mean age of 56 years. The patients were retrospectively evaluated with regard to postoperative donor site morbidity and complications at the donor site.
RESULTS: For the donor site morbidity, 74% of the patients were free of pain within 3 weeks, whereas 26% of the patients had a prolonged period of pain lasting from a few weeks to several months. For 11% of the patients, there was still some pain or discomfort 2 years after the grafting surgery. For gait disturbance the figures were similar: 79% had no problems after 3 weeks. For the eight patients who still had some pain after 2 years, which was considered permanent, three also had gait disturbance. There was a total of three major complications (4%), one iliac wing fracture and two neurologic injuries.
CONCLUSION: When harvesting a large amount of unicortical corticocancellous bone blocks from the the superolateral site of the iliac crest with a "peel off" technique, morbidity and complication rates do not differ significantly compared with those of the traditional anterior medial approach. Oral rehabilitation with maxillary reconstruction with bone grafts from the iliac crest and endosseous implants significantly improved oral function, facial appearance, and recreation/social activities and resulted in an overall improvement in quality of life in formerly edentulous patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14575632     DOI: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2003.tb00198.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Implant Dent Relat Res        ISSN: 1523-0899            Impact factor:   3.932


  28 in total

Review 1.  [Bone harvesting from the iliac crest].

Authors:  M Jäger; B Westhoff; A Wild; R Krauspe
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 1.087

2.  Historic and current strategies in bone tissue engineering: do we have a hope in Hench?

Authors:  Eileen Gentleman; Julia M Polak
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2006-11-22       Impact factor: 3.896

3.  Full rehabilitation with nobel clinician(®) and procera implant bridge(®): case report.

Authors:  D Spinelli; L Ottria; G DE Vico; R Bollero; A Barlattani; P Bollero
Journal:  Oral Implantol (Rome)       Date:  2013-10-15

4.  Immediate loading of four implants (BTLock(®)) in the maxilla and provisional restoration with guide-surgery (SimPlant, Materialise(®)): case report.

Authors:  D Spinelli; G DE Vico; R Schiavetti; M Bonino; A Pozzi; P Bollero; A Barlattani
Journal:  Oral Implantol (Rome)       Date:  2010-11-29

5.  The effect of Emdogain and platelet-derived growth factor on the osteoinductive potential of hydroxyapatite tricalcium phosphate.

Authors:  R C Chan; V Marino; P M Bartold
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2011-10-28       Impact factor: 3.573

6.  Transcrestal guided sinus lift without grafting materials: a 36 months clinical prospective study.

Authors:  D Spinelli; G DE Vico; R Condò; L Ottria; C Arcuri
Journal:  Oral Implantol (Rome)       Date:  2016-07-25

Review 7.  How efficacious is the combination of substitute bone graft with autogenous bone graft in comparison with substitute bone graft alone in the horizontal bone gain? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jonathan Meza-Mauricio; Camila-Pinheiro Furquim; Leonardo-Delfino Dos Reis; Marlon-Marx-Hilariano Maximiano; Gerardo Mendoza-Azpur; Francisco-Wilker-Mustafa-Gomes Muniz; Giulio Rasperini; Marcelo Faveri
Journal:  J Clin Exp Dent       Date:  2022-08-01

Review 8.  Complications related to bone augmentation procedures of localized defects in the alveolar ridge. A retrospective clinical study.

Authors:  Anders Torp Jensen; Simon Storgård Jensen; Nils Worsaae
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2016-03-02

9.  Effects of boric acid on bone formation after maxillary sinus floor augmentation in rabbits.

Authors:  Murat Ulu; Nükhet Kütük; Muhammet Furkan Cıcık; Suheyb Bilge; Hüseyin Akçay; Suna Saygılı; Mehmet İbrahim Tuğlu; Alper Alkan
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2018-10-22

10.  Single-crown restorations supported by short implants (6 mm) compared with standard-length implants (13 mm) in conjunction with maxillary sinus floor augmentation: a randomized, controlled clinical trial.

Authors:  Helle Baungaard Nielsen; Søren Schou; Niels Henrik Bruun; Thomas Starch-Jensen
Journal:  Int J Implant Dent       Date:  2021-07-16
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.