| Literature DB >> 32868438 |
Lorenzo Duso1,2, Christoph Zechner3,2,4.
Abstract
Compartmentalization of biochemical processes underlies all biological systems, from the organelle to the tissue scale. Theoretical models to study the interplay between noisy reaction dynamics and compartmentalization are sparse, and typically very challenging to analyze computationally. Recent studies have made progress toward addressing this problem in the context of specific biological systems, but a general and sufficiently effective approach remains lacking. In this work, we propose a mathematical framework based on counting processes that allows us to study dynamic compartment populations with arbitrary interactions and internal biochemistry. We derive an efficient description of the dynamics in terms of differential equations which capture the statistics of the population. We demonstrate the relevance of our approach by analyzing models inspired by different biological processes, including subcellular compartmentalization and tissue homeostasis.Entities:
Keywords: counting processes; moment equations; stochastic population modeling
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32868438 PMCID: PMC7502757 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2003734117
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A ISSN: 0027-8424 Impact factor: 11.205
Fig. 1.Compartment population exhibiting chemical and compartmental dynamics. Compartment events alter the number of compartments in the population and, in general, also their content. Chemical events act only on the compartment contents, without changing the compartment number. (A) Schematic illustration of a simple example. This system is driven by an influx of compartments containing green molecules. The compartments can then randomly undergo binary fusion events. At the same time, the content of each compartment is subject to chemical modifications of two types: a bimolecular conversion of two green molecules into a yellow one, and a constant degradation of yellow molecules. (B–D) Output of one stochastic simulation of this specific model. (B) The marginals of the joint number distribution are shown at three time points. (C) Stochastic trajectory of the total number of compartments in the population. The positive and negative updates are caused by intake and fusion events, respectively. (D) The trajectories of the total amount of molecules in the population are affected by the chemical events and compartment influx, but not by compartment fusion.
Several examples of population transition classes and the structure of their rate laws
| Description | Stoichiometry | Propensity function |
| Compartment intake | ||
| Compartment exit | ||
| Binary coagulation | ||
| Binary fragmentation | ||
| Chemical reaction |
Fig. 2.Expected moment dynamics of compartment number and total mass for the nested birth–death model and the coagulation–fragmentation case study. Solutions obtained from moment equations (ODEs) are compared with Monte Carlo averages from stochastic simulations (SSA). Error bars and shaded areas correspond to 1 SD above and below the mean. (A) Schematic illustration of the nested birth–death system. (B and C) Moment dynamics for parameters , , , and . The content of new compartments is Poisson distributed mean . The superimposed black lines show one stochastic realization of Eqs. and in B and C, respectively. A small section (highlighted in red) is enlarged in Insets to illustrate the stochastic jump dynamics. (D) Schematic illustration of the coagulation–fragmentation model. (E and F) Expected moment dynamics for parameters = 10, , , , and varying according to the ratios shown in the legend.
Fig. 3.Moment dynamics and steady-state properties of the cell communication model and the stem cell system. (A) Schematic illustration of the reaction network and the cell–cell interaction mechanism in the cell communication model. The yellow square symbolizes the active gene state. The green square represents the expressed protein species. (B) Expected dynamics of the total protein mass for different values of , with 1 SD above and below the mean. Lines and shaded areas correspond to the result of moment equations, while dots and error bars were obtained from averaging stochastic simulations. The population comprises cells, of which only one is in the active state at time 0. Parameters are set to , , , and . (C) Variance-to-mean ratio of the steady-state total protein mass, obtained by moment equations and plotted as a function of . (Inset) The expected steady-state protein distribution in one cell, computed with stochastic simulations for the range of communication rates used in B. The dotted and dashed lines are analytical solutions, respectively, for no cell communication and infinitely fast communication (i.e., gene always active). (D) Schematic illustration of the stem cell model. Stem cells are indicated by an orange nucleus, and differentiated cells are indicated by a purple one. The green square represents a factor associated with cell cycle progression that induces stem cell division. The reference parameter values for E–H are set to , , , and . (E) (Upper) The accumulation-reset stochastic dynamics of in stem cells is shown for the initial transient of a single realization, starting with one stem cell. (Lower) The corresponding changes in total cell number and stem cell number. (F) Comparison of the expected dynamics for the total cell number (blue) and stem cell number (orange) obtained from moment equations (ODEs) and stochastic simulations (SSA), for two different initial conditions. (G) Dependency of the steady-state stem cell fraction on variations of some model parameters around their reference values, computed from moment equations. (H) Robust dynamics of the stem cell fraction, upon applying a perturbation at time where was suddenly downscaled by a factor of 5. In red, the expected stem cell fraction obtained from moment equations. In orange, one particular stochastic realization.