Literature DB >> 26780652

Applications and implications of the exponentially modified gamma distribution as a model for time variabilities related to cell proliferation and gene expression.

A Golubev1.   

Abstract

A panel of published distributions of cell interdivision times (IDT) comprising 77 datasets related to 16 cell types, some studied under different conditions, was used to evaluate their conformance to the exponentially modified gamma distribution (EMGD) in comparison with distributions suggested for IDT data earlier. Lognormal, gamma, inverse Gaussian, and shifted Weibull and gamma distributions were found to be generally inferior to EMGD. Exponentially modified Gaussian (EMG) performed equally well. Although EMGD or EMG may be worse than some other distributions in specific cases, the reason that IDT distributions must be generated by a common mechanism of the cell cycle makes it unlikely that they differ essentially in different cell types. Therefore, exponentially modified peak functions, such as EMGD or EMG, are most appropriate if the use of a single distribution for IDT data is reasonable. EMGD is also shown to be the best descriptive tool for published data on the distribution of times between the bursts of mRNA synthesis at defined genes in single cells. EMG is inadequate to such data because its Gaussian component markedly extends to the negative time domain. The applicability of EMGD to comparable features of cells and genes behaviors are discussed to support the validity of the transition probability model and to relate the exponential component of EMGD to the times of cell dwelling in the restriction point of the cell cycle.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  Cell cycle; Single cell; Time distribution; Transcriptional cycle; Transition probability

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26780652     DOI: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2015.12.027

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Theor Biol        ISSN: 0022-5193            Impact factor:   2.691


  9 in total

Review 1.  A Tale of Two Concepts: Harmonizing the Free Radical and Antagonistic Pleiotropy Theories of Aging.

Authors:  Alexey Golubev; Andrew D Hanson; Vadim N Gladyshev
Journal:  Antioxid Redox Signal       Date:  2017-10-17       Impact factor: 8.401

2.  Characterization of dependencies between growth and division in budding yeast.

Authors:  Michael B Mayhew; Edwin S Iversen; Alexander J Hartemink
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 4.118

3.  A Multi-stage Representation of Cell Proliferation as a Markov Process.

Authors:  Christian A Yates; Matthew J Ford; Richard L Mort
Journal:  Bull Math Biol       Date:  2017-10-13       Impact factor: 1.758

4.  A drift-diffusion checkpoint model predicts a highly variable and growth-factor-sensitive portion of the cell cycle G1 phase.

Authors:  Zack W Jones; Rachel Leander; Vito Quaranta; Leonard A Harris; Darren R Tyson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-02-12       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Eternal sunshine of the spotless cycle.

Authors:  Lendert Gelens; Silvia Dm Santos
Journal:  Mol Syst Biol       Date:  2019-04-05       Impact factor: 11.429

6.  Analytical distributions for detailed models of stochastic gene expression in eukaryotic cells.

Authors:  Zhixing Cao; Ramon Grima
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-02-18       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Stochastic reaction networks in dynamic compartment populations.

Authors:  Lorenzo Duso; Christoph Zechner
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-08-31       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Cell size distribution of lineage data: analytic results and parameter inference.

Authors:  Chen Jia; Abhyudai Singh; Ramon Grima
Journal:  iScience       Date:  2021-02-24

9.  Exponentially Modified Peak Functions in Biomedical Sciences and Related Disciplines.

Authors:  A Golubev
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2017-06-05       Impact factor: 2.238

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.