| Literature DB >> 32863998 |
Nana Zhang1, Meng Cao1, Yixin Duan1, Haixia Bai1, Xiang Li1, Yili Wang1.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: We performed a meta-analysis and an experimental validation to investigate the association between tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) and the outcome of gastric cancer (GC) patients to provide prognostic indicators for clinical practice.Entities:
Keywords: gastric cancer; meta-analysis; outcome; prognostic indicators; tumor infiltrating lymphocytes
Year: 2019 PMID: 32863998 PMCID: PMC7444703 DOI: 10.5114/aoms.2019.86101
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Arch Med Sci ISSN: 1734-1922 Impact factor: 3.318
Patient characteristics (n = 147)
| Feature | Frequency, |
|---|---|
| Age [years]: | |
| ≤ 45 | 20 (13.6) |
| 45–60 | 52 (35.4) |
| ≥ 60 | 75 (51.0) |
| Sex: | |
| Female | 31 (21.1) |
| Male | 116 (78.9) |
| Tumor location: | |
| Cardia | 38 (25.9) |
| Antrum | 66 (44.9) |
| Corpus | 43 (29.2) |
| Lymph node involvement: | |
| Negative | 62 (42.2) |
| Positive | 85 (57.8) |
| TNM stage: | |
| IA–IB | 39 (26.5) |
| IIA–IIB | 40 (27.2) |
| IIIA–IIIC | 68 (46.3) |
| IV | 0 (0) |
| Grade: | |
| G1 | 3 (2.0) |
| G2 | 58 (39.5) |
| G3 | 70 (47.6) |
| G4 | 16 (10.9) |
Figure 1Flow diagram of the study selection process
Main characteristics of the included studies
| Author, year [ref.] | Country | Sample number (male/female) | Lymph node metastasis (positive/negative) | Tumor stage (I/II/III/IV) | Detection method | TILs phenotype | TILs location | Cut-off for overexpression | Follow-up [months] Median (range) | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grogg 2003 [ | America | 110 (72/38) | 29/81 | 15/15/43/37 | HE | TIL | IT | Median | 1–131 | OS |
| Lee 2008 [ | Korea | 220 (156/164) | 165/55 | 67/53/55/45 | IHC | CD3, CD8 | IT | 75th percentile | 66.4 (1–108) | OS |
| Perrone 2008 [ | Italy | 110 (53/57) | 79/31 | NA | IHC | FOXP3 | IT | Median | 36–108 | OS, RFS |
| Haas 2009 [ | Germany | 52 (40/12) | 28/24 | 20/19/10/3 | IHC | FOXP3, CD3, CD8, GrB | TS, TP | Median | 61 (36–132) | DFS |
| Shen 2010 [ | China | 135 (90/45) | 84/51 | 40/28/60/7 | IHC | FOXP3, CD4, CD8 | IT | Median | 57 (5–120) | OS |
| Kashimura 2011 [ | Japan | 123 (89/34) | 42/81 | 80/10/13/20 | IHC | FOXP3 | IT | Median | 1–108 | OS, DFS |
| Kim HI 2011 [ | Korea | 180 (126/54) | 107/73 | 0/81/99/0 | IHC | CD3, CD4, CD8 FOXP3, GrB | IT | Median | 45 | OS |
| Wang 2011 [ | China | 107 (69/38) | 69/38 | NA | IHC | FOXP3 | IT, PT | Median | 62 (2–120) | OS |
| Chen 2012 [ | China | 152 (117/35) | 98/35 | 10/31/93/18 | HE | TIL | TN | 19.05/HPF | 12–144 | OS, DFS |
| Kim KJ 2013 [ | Korea | 99 (55/44) | 57/42 | Not clear | IHC | CD8 | IT | Median and 60th percentile | 59 (1–96) | OS |
| Kim JW 2014 [ | Korea | 243 (152/91) | 124/119 | 120/41/82/0 | IHC | CD3, CD4, CD8 | IT | Median | 74 (0–123) | OS, DFS |
| Arigami 2014 [ | Japan | 120 (74/46) | 66/54 | 46/16/36/22 | IHC | CD3 | IT | Median | 36 (1–112) | OS |
| Geng 2014 [ | China | 100 (61/39) | 68/32 | NA | ICH | FOXP3 | IT | 25.0 % field | > 60 | OS |
| Liu 2015 [ | China | 166 (125/41) | 118/48 | 23/41/80/22 | IHC | CD3, CD4, CD8, FOXP3 | IT, PT | Median | 79.59 (36–96) | OS |
| Kang 2016 [ | Korea | 120 (96/24) | 33/87 | 74/26/19/1 | HE | TIL | TS | Median | 22.2 (2.1–50.8) | RFS, DFS |
| Kawazoe 2016 [ | Japan | 487 (327/160) | 449/38 | 0/0/358/129 | IHC | CD3, CD4, CD8, FOXP3 | IT | Median | NA | OS |
| Kim EK 2016 [ | Korea | 396 (270/126) | 246/156 | 165/77/143/11 | ICH | CD3, FOXP3 | IT | Mean value | 53.9 (0–84.5) | OS |
| Dong 2016 [ | China | 100 (72/28) | NA | 0/36/34/30 | ICH | CD8 | IT | Median | 36.5 (2–88) | OS, DFS |
TIL – tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte, PT – peritumoral, IT – intratumoral, TS – tumor stroma, TN – tumor nest, TP – tumor parenchyma, OS – overall survival, DFS – disease-free survival, RFS – relapse-free survival, NA – not available, IHC – immunohistochemistry, HE – hematoxylin-eosin, DFS – disease-free survival.
Pooled associations between intratumoral TIL subsets and overall survial of patients with gastric cancer
| Subsets | No. of studies | No. of patients | Analysis model | HR (95% CI) | Heterogeneity | Publication bias Begg’s | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CD8+ TIL | 7 | 1630 | Fixed | 0.699 (0.625–0.782) | < 0.001 | 4.3%, 0.394 | 0.368, 0.825 |
| CD4+ TIL | 5 | 1211 | Fixed | 0.770 (0.673–0.881) | < 0.001 | 47.5%, 0.107 | 0.806, 0.578 |
| CD3+ TIL | 7 | 1812 | Fixed | 0.610 (0.526–0.708) | < 0.001 | 0.0%, 0.926 | 0.230, 0.391 |
| FOXP3+ TIL | 9 | 1793 | Random | 1.382 (0.944–2.025) | 0.096 | 77.4%, < 0.001 | 0.466, 0.080 |
Figure 2Forest plots of studies evaluating hazard ratios of high level of intratumoral TIL subsets in gastric cancer. Forest plots of the prognostic effect on OS of CD8+ T cells (A), CD3+ T cells (B). Forest plots of studies evaluating hazard ratios of high level of intratumoral TIL subsets in gastric cancer. Forest plots of the prognostic effect on OS of CD4+ T cells (C), FOXP3+ T cells (D)
Figure 3Funnel plots of association of intratumoral FOXP3+ T cell infiltration with overall survival in select studies
Figure 4Images (400×) were the positive T cells of FOXP3 (A), OX40 (B), CD8 (C), and GrB (D), infiltrating intratumoral Tissue
Figure 5Kaplan-Meier curves. A, B – the survival rate with respect to the density of GrB+ T cells (p = 0.007), and the total number of CD8+, FOXP3+, OX40+ T cells (p = 0.009)