| Literature DB >> 19732435 |
Matthias Haas1, Arno Dimmler, Werner Hohenberger, Gerhard G Grabenbauer, Gerald Niedobitek, Luitpold V Distel.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Recent evidence suggests that CD4+CD25+FoxP3+ regulatory T-cells (Treg) may be responsible for the failure of host anti-tumour immunity by suppressing cytotoxic T- cells. We assessed the prognostic significance of tumour infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL) in intestinal-type gastric cardiac cancer.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2009 PMID: 19732435 PMCID: PMC2749861 DOI: 10.1186/1471-230X-9-65
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Gastroenterol ISSN: 1471-230X Impact factor: 3.067
Figure 1Tissue microarrays. (A) Tissue microarray, tumor punches [TU], metastatic lymph node punches [LM] and control lymph node punches stained for CD3. (B) Primary tumor side. By means of a semi-automatic image processing software (Biomas, Erlangen, Germany), the count of positively stained cells was set into relation to the surface of the epithelial compartment [EC] (after exclusion of the luminal compartment [LC]) and the stromal compartment [SC], respectively. (C) FoxP3+ TILs in primary tumor site and the stromal compartment (D) FoxP3+ cells in the lymph node (E) FoxP3+ cells in control lymph node (F) CD3+ TILs in primary tumor site (G) CD8+ TILs in primary tumor site (H) CD20+ TILs in primary tumor site (I) CD68+ macrophages in primary tumor site (J) Granzyme B+ TILs in primary tumor site.
Patient characteristics: stage, grade and status.
| N (%) | ||
|---|---|---|
| Factor | All patients | 52 (100) |
| Gender | Male | 40 (76.9) |
| Female | 12 (23.1) | |
| TNM stage (UICC 2002) | I | 20 (39.2) |
| II | 19 (36.5) | |
| III | 10 (19.2) | |
| IV | 3 (5.8) | |
| Grading | G 1 | 1 (2) |
| G 2 | 29 (56) | |
| G 3 | 21 (40) | |
| G 4 | 1 (2) | |
| T category | T 1 | 12 (23) |
| T 2 | 32 (62) | |
| T 3 | 5 (10) | |
| T 4 | 3 (6) | |
| N category | N 0 | 24 (46.2) |
| N + | 28 (53.8) | |
| N 1 | 22 (42.3) | |
| N 2 | 6 (11.5) | |
| Any Relapse | Yes | 17 (32.7) |
| No | 35 (67.3) | |
| Local recurrence | Yes | 5 (9.6) |
| No | 47 (90.4) | |
| Distant Metastasis | Yes | 14 (26.9) |
| No | 38 (73.1) | |
| Status | Alive with NED | 25 (48) |
| Dead of disease | 15 (29) | |
| Dead without disease | 12 (23) | |
Patient characteristics: follow-up and survival.
| Mean | Median | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | 64.6 | 67.0 | 61.5 - 67.7 |
| Follow-up time (months) | 71.2 | 61.0 | 54.7 - 57.8 |
| Overall survival time (months) | 58.6 | 50.0 | 46.4 - 70.8 |
| NED-survival time (months) | 55.7 | 41.5 | 43.1 - 68.3 |
| Time to relapse (months) | 23.8 | 17.0 | 13.8 - 33.7 |
Descriptive statistics for TILs and macrophages in the primary tumour, metastatic lymph nodes and non affected lymph nodes for intraepithelial and stromal location.
| Cells per mm2 | Mean | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CD3 | 122.8 | 895.7 | 63.5 | 645.1 | 3710.1 | 7686.7 |
| CD8 | 114.5 | 424.4 | 98.0 | 358.2 | 1071.9 | 2436.1 |
| CD20 | 18.9 | 438.7 | 9.4 | 351.4 | 5612.7 | n.d. |
| CD68 | 18.7 | 482.7 | 17.9 | 617.1 | 1457.8 | 506.4 |
| FoxP3 | 14.3 | 187.5 | 12.1 | 90.2 | 532.0 | 337.0 |
| Gran.B | 3.0 | 39.8 | 0.8 | 42.3 | 89.4 | 46.9 |
| CD3 | 71.2 - 174.5 | 714.6 - 1076.8 | 3.7 - 123.3 | 389.4 - 900.9 | 3149.5 - 4270.7 | 7088.1 - 8285.4 |
| CD8 | 51.1 - 178.0 | 299.6 - 549.2 | 0 (-35.3) - 231.3 | 146.2 - 570.3 | 696.9 - 1447.0 | 2203.2 - 2669.0 |
| CD20 | 0 (-0.1) - 37.9 | 249.7 - 627.7 | 0 (-2.1) - 20.9 | 180.9 - 521.8 | 4800.7 - 6424.8 | n.d. |
| CD68 | 12.5 - 24.9 | 407.6 - 557.7 | 2.2 - 33.6 | 388.6 - 845.6 | 1051.8 - 1863.9 | 451.5 - 561.4 |
| FoxP3 | 6.5 - 22.2 | 142.0 - 233.0 | 5.7 - 18.5 | 51.5 - 128.8 | 179.3 - 884.7 | 256.2 - 417.7 |
| Gran.B | 0.6 - 5.4 | 28.3 - 51.2 | 0 - 1.7 | 21.4 - 63.2 | 17.7 - 161.1 | 32.8 - 61.0 |
| CD3 | 40.9 | 752.1 | 18.3 | 366.2 | 3625.3 | 7752.0 |
| CD8 | 21.6 | 212.7 | 2.8 | 203.7 | 888.5 | 2433.4 |
| CD20 | 0 | 146.7 | 0 | 242.8 | 5855.7 | n.d. |
| CD68 | 11.5 | 480.9 | 2.3 | 487.5 | 1238.8 | 478.6 |
| FoxP3 | 3.6 | 125.9 | 8.0 | 75.6 | 225.7 | 245.4 |
| Gran.B | 0 | 26.7 | 0 | 23.4 | 42.9 | 34.1 |
Numbers represent mean and median values for labelled cells per mm2. In addition, 95% confidence intervals of the mean are given.
Figure 2Mean counts of TIL-subtypes in different compartments. The counts are given per mm2. (A) CD3+ counts (B) CD8+ counts (C) FoxP3+ counts. The asterisks (*) indicate that a statistical significant difference (p < 0.001 level) was observed between intraepithelial and stromal compartment of primary tumor and metastatic tissue of the lymph node, respectively, and between affected and uninvolved lymph node.
Figure 3Prognostic significance of FoxP3. NED-survival rates in relation to the TIL infiltration were calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method and analyzed by the log-rank test. (A) Distribution of FoxP3+ cell counts in stromal compartment of primary tumor. The abscissa shows the average number of intraepithelial FoxP3+ TILs while the ordinate depicts the number of cases in each class. (B) Impact of FoxP3+ TILs in epithelial compartment of primary tumor, (C) impact of FoxP3+ TIL in stromal compartment of primary tumor, (D) impact of FoxP3+ TILs in tumor compartment of metastasis, (E) impact of FoxP3+ TILs in stromal compartment of metastasis, (F) impact of FoxP3+ cells in lymph nodes.
Univariate and multivariate analysis of NED-survival according to Cox's proportional hazards model.
| Univariate Analysis | Multivariate Analysis | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, years (continuous) | 1.01 | 0.96-1.06 | 0.78 | - | - | - |
| Gender (female [n = 12] vs male [n = 40]) | 0.48 | 0.11-2.10 | 0.33 | - | - | - |
| Stage (UICC II and higher [n = 32] vs. UICC I [n = 20]) | 3.72 | 1.07-12.98 | 0.04 | 2.00 | 0.42-9.09 | 0.39 |
| Grade (3+4 [n = 22] vs. 1+2 [n = 30]) | 1.43 | 0.55-3.71 | 0.46 | - | - | - |
| T category (T3/T4 [n = 8] vs. T1/T2 [n = 44]) | 2.48 | 0.80-7.68 | 0.11 | - | - | - |
| N category (. N+ [n = 28] vs N0 [n = 24]) | 3.27 | 1.06-10.02 | 0.04 | 2.04 | 0.51-8.33 | 0.32 |
| Number of metastatic lymph nodes (continuous) | 1.35 | 1.17-1.56 | <0.001 | - | - | - |
| CD3+ TIL | 0.76 | 0.29-1.98 | 0.58 | - | - | - |
| CD8+ TIL | 1.26 | 0.48-3.32 | 0.63 | - | - | - |
| CD20+ TIL | 2.05 | 0.79-5.32 | 0.14 | - | - | - |
| CD68+ TIM | 0.69 | 0.27-1.80 | 0.45 | - | - | - |
| FoxP3+ TIL | 0.78 | 0.30-2.03 | 0.61 | - | - | - |
| Granzyme B+ TIL | 0.72 | 0.21-2.53 | 0.61 | - | - | - |
| - | - | - | ||||
| CD3+ TIL | 0.86 | 0.33-2.23 | 0.76 | - | - | - |
| CD8+ TIL | 0.85 | 0.33-2.20 | 0.74 | - | - | - |
| CD20+ TIL | 0.80 | 0.31-2.08 | 0.65 | - | - | - |
| CD68+ TIM | 0.81 | 0.31-2.10 | 0.66 | - | - | - |
| FoxP3+ TIL | 0.23 | 0.08-0.72 | 0.25 | 0.08-0.78 | ||
| Granzyme B+ TIL | 0.87 | 0.33-2.29 | 0.78 | - | - | - |
| Ratio stromal CD68 (primary tumour)/stromal FoxP3 (primary tumour) | 4.02 | 1.31-12.36 | ||||
| CD3+ TIL | 0.32 | 0.09-1.12 | 0.07 | |||
| CD8+ TIL | 1.14 | 0.35-3.76 | 0.83 | |||
| CD20+ TIL | 0.20 | 0.03-1.58 | 0.13 | |||
| CD68+ TIM | 0.96 | 0.29-3.16 | 0.95 | |||
| FoxP3+ TIL | 0.58 | 0.17-1.99 | 0.39 | |||
| Granzyme B+ TIL | 0.88 | 0.19-4.09 | 0.87 | |||
| CD3+ TIL | 0.61 | 0.19-2.03 | 0.42 | |||
| CD8+ TIL | 1.16 | 0.35-3.81 | 0.81 | |||
| CD20+ TIL | 0.51 | 0.15-1.75 | 0.28 | |||
| CD68+ TIM | 1.30 | 0.40-4.28 | 0.66 | |||
| FoxP3+ TIL | 0.81 | 0.25-2.69 | 0.74 | |||
| Granzyme B+ TIL | 0.75 | 0.23-2.46 | 0.63 | |||
| CD3+ | 0.47 | 0.17-1.26 | 0.13 | |||
| CD8+ | 0.84 | 0.32-2.19 | 0.72 | |||
| CD20+ | ||||||
| CD68+ | 0.56 | 0.21-1.47 | 0.24 | |||
| FoxP3+ | 1.03 | 0.40-2.68 | 0.95 | |||
| Granzyme B+ | 0.35 | 0.12-0.99 | ||||
For multivariate Cox's proportional hazards model UICC-stage and nodal status were adopted as covariates. Median values were used as cut-off.