Literature DB >> 32861513

Structural and Biophysical Mechanisms of Class C G Protein-Coupled Receptor Function.

Amr Ellaithy1, Javier Gonzalez-Maeso2, Diomedes A Logothetis3, Joshua Levitz4.   

Abstract

Groundbreaking structural and spectroscopic studies of class A G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), such as rhodopsin and the β2 adrenergic receptor, have provided a picture of how structural rearrangements between transmembrane helices control ligand binding, receptor activation, and effector coupling. However, the activation mechanism of other GPCR classes remains more elusive, in large part due to complexity in their domain assembly and quaternary structure. In this review, we focus on the class C GPCRs, which include metabotropic glutamate receptors (mGluRs) and gamma-aminobutyric acid B (GABAB) receptors (GABABRs) most prominently. We discuss the unique biophysical questions raised by the presence of large extracellular ligand-binding domains (LBDs) and constitutive homo/heterodimerization. Furthermore, we discuss how recent studies have begun to unravel how these fundamental class C GPCR features impact the processes of ligand binding, receptor activation, signal transduction, regulation by accessory proteins, and crosstalk with other GPCRs.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  G protein-coupled receptors; GABA(B) receptor; calcium-sensing receptor; metabotropic glutamate receptor

Year:  2020        PMID: 32861513      PMCID: PMC7642020          DOI: 10.1016/j.tibs.2020.07.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Trends Biochem Sci        ISSN: 0968-0004            Impact factor:   13.807


  128 in total

1.  A new approach to analyze cell surface protein complexes reveals specific heterodimeric metabotropic glutamate receptors.

Authors:  Etienne Doumazane; Pauline Scholler; Jurriaan M Zwier; Eric Trinquet; Philippe Rondard; Jean-Philippe Pin
Journal:  FASEB J       Date:  2010-09-08       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 2.  G protein-coupled receptor oligomerization revisited: functional and pharmacological perspectives.

Authors:  Sergi Ferré; Vicent Casadó; Lakshmi A Devi; Marta Filizola; Ralf Jockers; Martin J Lohse; Graeme Milligan; Jean-Philippe Pin; Xavier Guitart
Journal:  Pharmacol Rev       Date:  2014-02-10       Impact factor: 25.468

Review 3.  Impact of GPCR Structures on Drug Discovery.

Authors:  Miles Congreve; Chris de Graaf; Nigel A Swain; Christopher G Tate
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2020-04-02       Impact factor: 41.582

4.  Structure of class C GPCR metabotropic glutamate receptor 5 transmembrane domain.

Authors:  Andrew S Doré; Krzysztof Okrasa; Jayesh C Patel; Maria Serrano-Vega; Kirstie Bennett; Robert M Cooke; James C Errey; Ali Jazayeri; Samir Khan; Ben Tehan; Malcolm Weir; Giselle R Wiggin; Fiona H Marshall
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2014-07-06       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Ca(2+) requirement for high-affinity gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) binding at GABA(B) receptors: involvement of serine 269 of the GABA(B)R1 subunit.

Authors:  T Galvez; S Urwyler; L Prézeau; J Mosbacher; C Joly; B Malitschek; J Heid; I Brabet; W Froestl; B Bettler; K Kaupmann; J P Pin
Journal:  Mol Pharmacol       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 4.436

6.  Identification of three residues essential for 5-hydroxytryptamine 2A-metabotropic glutamate 2 (5-HT2A·mGlu2) receptor heteromerization and its psychoactive behavioral function.

Authors:  José L Moreno; Carolina Muguruza; Adrienne Umali; Steven Mortillo; Terrell Holloway; Fuencisla Pilar-Cuéllar; Giuseppe Mocci; Jeremy Seto; Luis F Callado; Rachael L Neve; Graeme Milligan; Stuart C Sealfon; Juan F López-Giménez; J Javier Meana; Deanna L Benson; Javier González-Maeso
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2012-11-05       Impact factor: 5.157

7.  Chronic methamphetamine self-administration dysregulates 5-HT2A and mGlu2 receptor expression in the rat prefrontal and perirhinal cortex: Comparison to chronic phencyclidine and MK-801.

Authors:  Peter U Hámor; Jana Šírová; Tomáš Páleníček; Magdalena Zaniewska; Věra Bubeníková-Valešová; Marek Schwendt
Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav       Date:  2018-09-18       Impact factor: 3.533

8.  Structural mechanism of ligand activation in human calcium-sensing receptor.

Authors:  Yong Geng; Lidia Mosyak; Igor Kurinov; Hao Zuo; Emmanuel Sturchler; Tat Cheung Cheng; Prakash Subramanyam; Alice P Brown; Sarah C Brennan; Hee-Chang Mun; Martin Bush; Yan Chen; Trang X Nguyen; Baohua Cao; Donald D Chang; Matthias Quick; Arthur D Conigrave; Henry M Colecraft; Patricia McDonald; Qing R Fan
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2016-07-19       Impact factor: 8.140

9.  Structural basis for KCTD-mediated rapid desensitization of GABAB signalling.

Authors:  Sanduo Zheng; Nohely Abreu; Joshua Levitz; Andrew C Kruse
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2019-02-27       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Rearrangement of the transmembrane domain interfaces associated with the activation of a GPCR hetero-oligomer.

Authors:  Li Xue; Qian Sun; Han Zhao; Xavier Rovira; Siyu Gai; Qianwen He; Jean-Philippe Pin; Jianfeng Liu; Philippe Rondard
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2019-06-24       Impact factor: 14.919

View more
  14 in total

Review 1.  The role of ADRB2 gene polymorphisms in malignancies.

Authors:  Yaqian Wang; Shujuan Jiang
Journal:  Mol Biol Rep       Date:  2021-03-06       Impact factor: 2.316

2.  Amino acid sensor conserved from bacteria to humans.

Authors:  Vadim M Gumerov; Ekaterina P Andrianova; Miguel A Matilla; Karen M Page; Elizabet Monteagudo-Cascales; Annette C Dolphin; Tino Krell; Igor B Zhulin
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2022-03-01       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 3.  G protein-coupled receptor-effector macromolecular membrane assemblies (GEMMAs).

Authors:  Sergi Ferré; Francisco Ciruela; Carmen W Dessauer; Javier González-Maeso; Terence E Hébert; Ralf Jockers; Diomedes E Logothetis; Leonardo Pardo
Journal:  Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2021-09-01       Impact factor: 13.400

4.  G-protein activation by a metabotropic glutamate receptor.

Authors:  Alpay B Seven; Ximena Barros-Álvarez; Marine de Lapeyrière; Makaía M Papasergi-Scott; Michael J Robertson; Chensong Zhang; Robert M Nwokonko; Yang Gao; Justin G Meyerowitz; Jean-Philippe Rocher; Dominik Schelshorn; Brian K Kobilka; Jesper M Mathiesen; Georgios Skiniotis
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2021-06-30       Impact factor: 69.504

5.  Differences in interactions between transmembrane domains tune the activation of metabotropic glutamate receptors.

Authors:  Jordana K Thibado; Jean-Yves Tano; Joon Lee; Leslie Salas-Estrada; Davide Provasi; Alexa Strauss; Joao Marcelo Lamim Ribeiro; Guoqing Xiang; Johannes Broichhagen; Marta Filizola; Martin J Lohse; Joshua Levitz
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2021-04-21       Impact factor: 8.713

Review 6.  Structural Characterization of Receptor-Receptor Interactions in the Allosteric Modulation of G Protein-Coupled Receptor (GPCR) Dimers.

Authors:  Raudah Lazim; Donghyuk Suh; Jai Woo Lee; Thi Ngoc Lan Vu; Sanghee Yoon; Sun Choi
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-03-22       Impact factor: 6.208

7.  Single-Molecule Fluorescence Imaging Reveals GABAB Receptor Aggregation State Changes.

Authors:  Fang Luo; GeGe Qin; Lina Wang; Xiaohong Fang
Journal:  Front Chem       Date:  2022-01-19       Impact factor: 5.221

8.  Biophysical and functional characterization of the human TAS1R2 sweet taste receptor overexpressed in a HEK293S inducible cell line.

Authors:  Christine Belloir; Marine Brulé; Lucie Tornier; Fabrice Neiers; Loïc Briand
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-11-15       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Conserved residues in the extracellular loop 2 regulate Stachel-mediated activation of ADGRG2.

Authors:  Abanoub A Gad; Pedram Azimzadeh; Nariman Balenga
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-07-07       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 10.  Molecular mechanisms of metabotropic GABAB receptor function.

Authors:  Hamidreza Shaye; Benjamin Stauch; Cornelius Gati; Vadim Cherezov
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2021-05-28       Impact factor: 14.136

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.