Literature DB >> 23265097

Sex differences in the management and outcomes of Ontario patients with cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction.

Husam M Abdel-Qadir1, Joan Ivanov, Peter C Austin, Jack V Tu, Vladimír Džavík.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Sex differences in the management of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) patients with cardiogenic shock (CS) have not been well studied.
METHODS: We examined mortality and revascularization rates of 9750 patients with CS between 1992 and 2008 in the Ontario Myocardial Infarction Database. Men and women were compared in the entire cohort and in subgroups divided by age (aged < 75 years vs aged ≥ 75 years) and revascularization availability at presenting hospital. Logistic regression was used to determine the adjusted effect of sex on mortality and to determine predictors of revascularization.
RESULTS: The incidence of CS was higher in women (3.7% of female vs 2.7% of male AMI patients; P < 0.001). Women with CS were older than men (mean age: 75.5 vs 71.1 years; P < 0.001) and less likely to present to revascularization-capable sites (16% vs 19.2%; P < 0.001). Unadjusted 1-year mortality rates were higher in women (80.3% vs 75.4%; P < 0.001). Women were less likely to be revascularized (12.6% vs 17.6%; P < 0.001) and less likely to be transferred when they presented to nonrevascularization sites (11.3% vs 14.2%; P < 0.001). The strongest predictor of revascularization was presentation to a revascularization-capable site (odds ratio, 17.69; P < 0.001). After regression adjustment, there were no significant differences in mortality or revascularization between the sexes.
CONCLUSION: Women with CS are older than men with CS and are less likely to present to revascularization-capable sites. This accounts for the lower unadjusted revascularization rates among women compared with men. However, there are no significant sex-based differences in adjusted mortality rates.
Copyright © 2013 Canadian Cardiovascular Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23265097     DOI: 10.1016/j.cjca.2012.09.020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can J Cardiol        ISSN: 0828-282X            Impact factor:   5.223


  10 in total

1.  Nationwide Routine-Data Analysis of Sex Differences in Outcome of Acute Myocardial Infarction.

Authors:  Eva Freisinger; Susanne Sehner; Nasser M Malyar; Anna Suling; Holger Reinecke; Karl Wegscheider
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  2018-06-11       Impact factor: 2.882

2.  Sex and Gender Disparities in the Management and Outcomes of Acute Myocardial Infarction-Cardiogenic Shock in Older Adults.

Authors:  Saraschandra Vallabhajosyula; Saarwaani Vallabhajosyula; Shannon M Dunlay; Sharonne N Hayes; Patricia J M Best; Jorge A Brenes-Salazar; Amir Lerman; Bernard J Gersh; Allan S Jaffe; Malcolm R Bell; David R Holmes; Gregory W Barsness
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2020-09       Impact factor: 7.616

3.  Gender differences in patients with cardiogenic shock complicating myocardial infarction: a substudy of the IABP-SHOCK II-trial.

Authors:  Karl Fengler; Georg Fuernau; Steffen Desch; Ingo Eitel; Franz-Josef Neumann; Hans-Georg Olbrich; Antoinette de Waha; Suzanne de Waha; Gert Richardt; Marcus Hennersdorf; Klaus Empen; Rainer Hambrecht; Jörg Fuhrmann; Michael Böhm; Janine Poess; Ruth Strasser; Steffen Schneider; Gerhard Schuler; Karl Werdan; Uwe Zeymer; Holger Thiele
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2014-10-07       Impact factor: 5.460

4.  Trends in incidence, management, and outcomes of cardiogenic shock complicating ST-elevation myocardial infarction in the United States.

Authors:  Dhaval Kolte; Sahil Khera; Wilbert S Aronow; Marjan Mujib; Chandrasekar Palaniswamy; Sachin Sule; Diwakar Jain; William Gotsis; Ali Ahmed; William H Frishman; Gregg C Fonarow
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2014-01-13       Impact factor: 5.501

5.  Gender Related Survival Differences in ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction Patients Treated with Primary PCI.

Authors:  Vojko Kanic; Maja Vollrath; Franjo Husam Naji; Andreja Sinkovic
Journal:  Int J Med Sci       Date:  2016-05-26       Impact factor: 3.738

6.  Gender disparities with the use of percutaneous left ventricular assist device in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention complicated by cardiogenic shock: From pVAD Working Group.

Authors:  Rajkumar Doshi; Krunalkumar Patel; Dean Decter; Rajiv Jauhar; Perwaiz Meraj
Journal:  Indian Heart J       Date:  2018-04-30

7.  Sex differences in patients with cardiogenic shock.

Authors:  Isabell Yan; Benedikt Schrage; Jessica Weimann; Salim Dabboura; Rafel Hilal; Benedikt N Beer; Peter Moritz Becher; Moritz Seiffert; Christina Magnussen; Renate B Schnabel; Paulus Kirchhof; Stefan Blankenberg; Dirk Westermann
Journal:  ESC Heart Fail       Date:  2021-03-24

8.  Gender Differences in Cardiogenic Shock Patients: Clinical Features, Risk Prediction, and Outcomes in a Hub Center.

Authors:  Sara Lozano-Jiménez; Reyes Iranzo-Valero; Javier Segovia-Cubero; Manuel Gómez-Bueno; Mercedes Rivas-Lasarte; Cristina Mitroi; Juan Manuel Escudier-Villa; Juan Francisco Oteo-Dominguez; Jose María Vieitez-Florez; Susana Villar-García; Francisco José Hernández-Pérez
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-07-13

9.  Gender differences in acute myocardial infarction-A nationwide German real-life analysis from 2014 to 2017.

Authors:  Leonie Kuehnemund; Jeanette Koeppe; Jannik Feld; Achim Wiederhold; Julia Illner; Lena Makowski; Joachim Gerß; Holger Reinecke; Eva Freisinger
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  2021-06-01       Impact factor: 2.882

Review 10.  Sex differences in acute cardiovascular care: a review and needs assessment.

Authors:  Saraschandra Vallabhajosyula; Dhiran Verghese; Viral K Desai; Pranathi R Sundaragiri; Virginia M Miller
Journal:  Cardiovasc Res       Date:  2022-02-21       Impact factor: 10.787

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.