BACKGROUND: Sex differences in the management of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) patients with cardiogenic shock (CS) have not been well studied. METHODS: We examined mortality and revascularization rates of 9750 patients with CS between 1992 and 2008 in the Ontario Myocardial Infarction Database. Men and women were compared in the entire cohort and in subgroups divided by age (aged < 75 years vs aged ≥ 75 years) and revascularization availability at presenting hospital. Logistic regression was used to determine the adjusted effect of sex on mortality and to determine predictors of revascularization. RESULTS: The incidence of CS was higher in women (3.7% of female vs 2.7% of male AMI patients; P < 0.001). Women with CS were older than men (mean age: 75.5 vs 71.1 years; P < 0.001) and less likely to present to revascularization-capable sites (16% vs 19.2%; P < 0.001). Unadjusted 1-year mortality rates were higher in women (80.3% vs 75.4%; P < 0.001). Women were less likely to be revascularized (12.6% vs 17.6%; P < 0.001) and less likely to be transferred when they presented to nonrevascularization sites (11.3% vs 14.2%; P < 0.001). The strongest predictor of revascularization was presentation to a revascularization-capable site (odds ratio, 17.69; P < 0.001). After regression adjustment, there were no significant differences in mortality or revascularization between the sexes. CONCLUSION: Women with CS are older than men with CS and are less likely to present to revascularization-capable sites. This accounts for the lower unadjusted revascularization rates among women compared with men. However, there are no significant sex-based differences in adjusted mortality rates.
BACKGROUND: Sex differences in the management of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) patients with cardiogenic shock (CS) have not been well studied. METHODS: We examined mortality and revascularization rates of 9750 patients with CS between 1992 and 2008 in the Ontario Myocardial Infarction Database. Men and women were compared in the entire cohort and in subgroups divided by age (aged < 75 years vs aged ≥ 75 years) and revascularization availability at presenting hospital. Logistic regression was used to determine the adjusted effect of sex on mortality and to determine predictors of revascularization. RESULTS: The incidence of CS was higher in women (3.7% of female vs 2.7% of male AMI patients; P < 0.001). Women with CS were older than men (mean age: 75.5 vs 71.1 years; P < 0.001) and less likely to present to revascularization-capable sites (16% vs 19.2%; P < 0.001). Unadjusted 1-year mortality rates were higher in women (80.3% vs 75.4%; P < 0.001). Women were less likely to be revascularized (12.6% vs 17.6%; P < 0.001) and less likely to be transferred when they presented to nonrevascularization sites (11.3% vs 14.2%; P < 0.001). The strongest predictor of revascularization was presentation to a revascularization-capable site (odds ratio, 17.69; P < 0.001). After regression adjustment, there were no significant differences in mortality or revascularization between the sexes. CONCLUSION:Women with CS are older than men with CS and are less likely to present to revascularization-capable sites. This accounts for the lower unadjusted revascularization rates among women compared with men. However, there are no significant sex-based differences in adjusted mortality rates.
Authors: Saraschandra Vallabhajosyula; Saarwaani Vallabhajosyula; Shannon M Dunlay; Sharonne N Hayes; Patricia J M Best; Jorge A Brenes-Salazar; Amir Lerman; Bernard J Gersh; Allan S Jaffe; Malcolm R Bell; David R Holmes; Gregory W Barsness Journal: Mayo Clin Proc Date: 2020-09 Impact factor: 7.616
Authors: Karl Fengler; Georg Fuernau; Steffen Desch; Ingo Eitel; Franz-Josef Neumann; Hans-Georg Olbrich; Antoinette de Waha; Suzanne de Waha; Gert Richardt; Marcus Hennersdorf; Klaus Empen; Rainer Hambrecht; Jörg Fuhrmann; Michael Böhm; Janine Poess; Ruth Strasser; Steffen Schneider; Gerhard Schuler; Karl Werdan; Uwe Zeymer; Holger Thiele Journal: Clin Res Cardiol Date: 2014-10-07 Impact factor: 5.460
Authors: Dhaval Kolte; Sahil Khera; Wilbert S Aronow; Marjan Mujib; Chandrasekar Palaniswamy; Sachin Sule; Diwakar Jain; William Gotsis; Ali Ahmed; William H Frishman; Gregg C Fonarow Journal: J Am Heart Assoc Date: 2014-01-13 Impact factor: 5.501
Authors: Isabell Yan; Benedikt Schrage; Jessica Weimann; Salim Dabboura; Rafel Hilal; Benedikt N Beer; Peter Moritz Becher; Moritz Seiffert; Christina Magnussen; Renate B Schnabel; Paulus Kirchhof; Stefan Blankenberg; Dirk Westermann Journal: ESC Heart Fail Date: 2021-03-24
Authors: Sara Lozano-Jiménez; Reyes Iranzo-Valero; Javier Segovia-Cubero; Manuel Gómez-Bueno; Mercedes Rivas-Lasarte; Cristina Mitroi; Juan Manuel Escudier-Villa; Juan Francisco Oteo-Dominguez; Jose María Vieitez-Florez; Susana Villar-García; Francisco José Hernández-Pérez Journal: Front Cardiovasc Med Date: 2022-07-13
Authors: Saraschandra Vallabhajosyula; Dhiran Verghese; Viral K Desai; Pranathi R Sundaragiri; Virginia M Miller Journal: Cardiovasc Res Date: 2022-02-21 Impact factor: 10.787