Literature DB >> 32859700

Longitudinal Molecular Imaging of Progesterone Receptor Reveals Early Differential Response to Endocrine Therapy in Breast Cancer with an Activating ESR1 Mutation.

Manoj Kumar1, Kelley Salem1, Justin J Jeffery2, Yongjun Yan1, Aparna M Mahajan3, Amy M Fowler4,2,5.   

Abstract

Activating mutations in the estrogen receptor (ER) α-gene (ESR1) result in constitutive transcriptional activity in the absence of estrogen and are associated with endocrine resistance in metastatic ER-positive (+) breast cancer. It is not known how activating ESR1 mutations may alter the predictive values of molecular imaging agents for endocrine therapy response. This study investigated the effect of an activating ESR1 mutation on pretreatment 18F-fluoroestradiol (18F-FES) uptake and early assessment of endocrine therapy response using 18F-FDG and 18F-fluorofuranylnorprogesterone (18F-FFNP) PET/CT imaging of tumor glucose metabolism and progesterone receptor (PR) expression, respectively.
Methods: ER+, PR+ T47D breast cancer cells expressing wild-type (WT) ER or an activating ESR1 mutation, Y537S-ER, were used to generate tumor xenografts in ovariectomized female immunodeficient mice supplemented with 17β-estradiol. Tumor growth curves were determined in the presence or absence of estrogen and for ethanol vehicle control or fulvestrant treatment, a selective ER degrader. Pretreatment 18F-FES uptake was compared between Y537S-ER and WT-ER tumors. Longitudinal PET/CT imaging with 18F-FFNP and 18F-FDG was performed before and 7-9 d after the start of endocrine therapy with fulvestrant. Radiopharmaceutical uptake in Y537S-ER and WT-ER tumors was compared between baseline and follow-up scans. Statistical significance was determined using paired t testing for longitudinal imaging and 2-way ANOVA for the 18F-FFNP tissue biodistribution assay.
Results: Y537S-ER xenografts showed estrogen-independent growth, whereas WT-ER tumors grew only with estrogen. Fulvestrant treatment for 28 d significantly reduced tumor volumes for WT-ER but only stabilized volumes for Y537S-ER. Baseline 18F-FES uptake did not significantly differ between WT-ER and Y537S-ER tumors. Fulvestrant treatment induced a similar early metabolic response for both WT-ER and Y537S-ER tumors. 18F-FFNP uptake in WT-ER tumors was significantly reduced after 7 d of fulvestrant treatment; however, this reduction did not occur in Y537S-ER tumors, which showed no significant change between baseline and follow-up PET/CT.
Conclusion: Molecular imaging of PR expression dynamics could be a noninvasive approach for early identification of reduced effectiveness of endocrine therapy resulting from activating ESR1 mutations.
© 2021 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

Entities:  

Keywords:  18F-FDG; 18F-FES; 18F-FFNP PET/CT; ESR1 mutation; fulvestrant

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32859700      PMCID: PMC8049365          DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.120.249508

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nucl Med        ISSN: 0161-5505            Impact factor:   11.082


  30 in total

1.  Small-animal PET of steroid hormone receptors predicts tumor response to endocrine therapy using a preclinical model of breast cancer.

Authors:  Amy M Fowler; Szeman Ruby Chan; Terry L Sharp; Nicole M Fettig; Dong Zhou; Carmen S Dence; Kathryn E Carlson; M Jeyakumar; John A Katzenellenbogen; Robert D Schreiber; Michael J Welch
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2012-06-05       Impact factor: 10.057

2.  Ligand-binding Domain-activating Mutations of ESR1 Rewire Cellular Metabolism of Breast Cancer Cells.

Authors:  Tami Rubinek; Lotem Zinger; Keren Merenbakh-Lamin; Anat Klein; Adi Elazar; Shani Journo; Tomer Boldes; Metsada Pasmanik-Chor; Avishay Spitzer; Ido Wolf
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2019-02-07       Impact factor: 12.531

3.  Longitudinal noninvasive imaging of progesterone receptor as a predictive biomarker of tumor responsiveness to estrogen deprivation therapy.

Authors:  Szeman Ruby Chan; Amy M Fowler; Julie A Allen; Dong Zhou; Carmen S Dence; Terry L Sharp; Nicole M Fettig; Farrokh Dehdashti; John A Katzenellenbogen
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2014-12-17       Impact factor: 12.531

4.  Positron emission tomography with 2-[18F]Fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose and 16alpha-[18F]fluoro-17beta-estradiol in breast cancer: correlation with estrogen receptor status and response to systemic therapy.

Authors:  J E Mortimer; F Dehdashti; B A Siegel; J A Katzenellenbogen; P Fracasso; M J Welch
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 12.531

5.  Molecular imaging to identify patients with metastatic breast cancer who benefit from endocrine treatment combined with cyclin-dependent kinase inhibition.

Authors:  Jorianne Boers; Clasina M Venema; Erik F J de Vries; Andor W J M Glaudemans; Thomas C Kwee; Ed Schuuring; John W M Martens; Sjoerd G Elias; Geke A P Hospers; Carolina P Schröder
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2019-12-28       Impact factor: 9.162

6.  Prevalence of ESR1 Mutations in Cell-Free DNA and Outcomes in Metastatic Breast Cancer: A Secondary Analysis of the BOLERO-2 Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Sarat Chandarlapaty; David Chen; Wei He; Patricia Sung; Aliaksandra Samoila; Daoqi You; Trusha Bhatt; Parul Patel; Maurizio Voi; Michael Gnant; Gabriel Hortobagyi; José Baselga; Mary Ellen Moynahan
Journal:  JAMA Oncol       Date:  2016-10-01       Impact factor: 31.777

7.  Sensitivity and Isoform Specificity of 18F-Fluorofuranylnorprogesterone for Measuring Progesterone Receptor Protein Response to Estradiol Challenge in Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Kelley Salem; Manoj Kumar; Yongjun Yan; Justin J Jeffery; Kyle C Kloepping; Ciara J Michel; Ginny L Powers; Aparna M Mahajan; Amy M Fowler
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2018-07-20       Impact factor: 10.057

8.  Plasma ESR1 Mutations and the Treatment of Estrogen Receptor-Positive Advanced Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Charlotte Fribbens; Ben O'Leary; Lucy Kilburn; Sarah Hrebien; Isaac Garcia-Murillas; Matthew Beaney; Massimo Cristofanilli; Fabrice Andre; Sherene Loi; Sibylle Loibl; John Jiang; Cynthia Huang Bartlett; Maria Koehler; Mitch Dowsett; Judith M Bliss; Stephen R D Johnston; Nicholas C Turner
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-06-06       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  Comparison of 18F-FES, 18F-FDG, and 18F-FMISO PET Imaging Probes for Early Prediction and Monitoring of Response to Endocrine Therapy in a Mouse Xenograft Model of ER-Positive Breast Cancer.

Authors:  SiMin He; MingWei Wang; ZhongYi Yang; JianPing Zhang; YongPing Zhang; JianMin Luo; YingJian Zhang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-07-28       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  The SERM/SERD bazedoxifene disrupts ESR1 helix 12 to overcome acquired hormone resistance in breast cancer cells.

Authors:  Sean W Fanning; Rinath Jeselsohn; Venkatasubramanian Dharmarajan; Christopher G Mayne; Mostafa Karimi; Gilles Buchwalter; René Houtman; Weiyi Toy; Colin E Fowler; Ross Han; Muriel Lainé; Kathryn E Carlson; Teresa A Martin; Jason Nowak; Jerome C Nwachukwu; David J Hosfield; Sarat Chandarlapaty; Emad Tajkhorshid; Kendall W Nettles; Patrick R Griffin; Yang Shen; John A Katzenellenbogen; Myles Brown; Geoffrey L Greene
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2018-11-29       Impact factor: 8.140

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Novel Tracers and Radionuclides in PET Imaging.

Authors:  Christian Mason; Grayson R Gimblet; Suzanne E Lapi; Jason S Lewis
Journal:  Radiol Clin North Am       Date:  2021-09       Impact factor: 1.947

2.  PET Imaging of Estrogen Receptors Using 18F-Based Radioligands.

Authors:  Manoj Kumar; Kelley Salem; Justin J Jeffery; Amy M Fowler
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2022
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.