| Literature DB >> 32859359 |
Bijan Safaee Fakhr1, Caio C Araujo Morais1, Roberta R De Santis Santiago1, Raffaele Di Fenza1, Lauren E Gibson1, Paula A Restrepo1, Marvin G Chang1, Edward A Bittner1, Riccardo Pinciroli1, Florian J Fintelmann2, Robert M Kacmarek3, Lorenzo Berra4.
Abstract
Entities:
Keywords: COVID-19; electrical impedance tomography; lung perfusion; mechanical ventilation; pulmonary embolism; ventilation/perfusion matching
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32859359 PMCID: PMC7413127 DOI: 10.1016/j.bja.2020.08.001
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Br J Anaesth ISSN: 0007-0912 Impact factor: 9.166
Fig 1Serial lung perfusion evaluation in a COVID-19 patient. (a–c) Electrical impedance tomography (EIT) perfusion images obtained at days 6, 8, and 18. Images were generated with Enlight 1800 (Timpel SA, São Paulo, Brazil) using the first-pass kinetics method. The lung is divided into four quadrants (regions of interest). Colour scale was adjusted by linear normalisation. (d) Axial CT pulmonary angiography image shows segmental and subsegmental pulmonary emboli in the right upper lobe (red arrow). (e) Axial CT pulmonary angiography image shows resolution of the pulmonary artery filling defect (red arrow) in comparison with the previous image. Day, day from admission to emergency department; CRS, respiratory system compliance; ΔP, driving pressure.