Literature DB >> 34082795

Unmatched ventilation and perfusion measured by electrical impedance tomography predicts the outcome of ARDS.

Elena Spinelli1, Michael Kircher2, Birgit Stender3, Irene Ottaviani1, Maria C Basile1, Ines Marongiu4, Giulia Colussi1, Giacomo Grasselli1,4, Antonio Pesenti1,4, Tommaso Mauri5,6.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), non-ventilated perfused regions coexist with non-perfused ventilated regions within lungs. The number of unmatched regions might reflect ARDS severity and affect the risk of ventilation-induced lung injury. Despite pathophysiological relevance, unmatched ventilation and perfusion are not routinely assessed at the bedside. The aims of this study were to quantify unmatched ventilation and perfusion at the bedside by electrical impedance tomography (EIT) investigating their association with mortality in patients with ARDS and to explore the effects of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) on unmatched ventilation and perfusion in subgroups of patients with different ARDS severity based on PaO2/FiO2 and compliance.
METHODS: Prospective observational study in 50 patients with mild (36%), moderate (46%), and severe (18%) ARDS under clinical ventilation settings. EIT was applied to measure the regional distribution of ventilation and perfusion using central venous bolus of saline 5% during end-inspiratory pause. We defined unmatched units as the percentage of only ventilated units plus the percentage of only perfused units.
RESULTS: Percentage of unmatched units was significantly higher in non-survivors compared to survivors (32[27-47]% vs. 21[17-27]%, p < 0.001). Percentage of unmatched units was an independent predictor of mortality (OR 1.22, 95% CI 1.07-1.39, p = 0.004) with an area under the ROC curve of 0.88 (95% CI 0.79-0.97, p < 0.001). The percentage of ventilation to the ventral region of the lung was higher than the percentage of ventilation to the dorsal region (32 [27-38]% vs. 18 [13-21]%, p < 0.001), while the opposite was true for perfusion (28 [22-38]% vs. 36 [32-44]%, p < 0.001). Higher percentage of only perfused units was correlated with lower dorsal ventilation (r =  - 0.486, p < 0.001) and with lower PaO2/FiO2 ratio (r =  - 0.293, p = 0.039).
CONCLUSIONS: EIT allows bedside assessment of unmatched ventilation and perfusion in mechanically ventilated patients with ARDS. Measurement of unmatched units could identify patients at higher risk of death and could guide personalized treatment.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Acute respiratory distress syndrome; Electrical impedance tomography; Positive end expiratory pressure; Ventilation/perfusion matching

Year:  2021        PMID: 34082795     DOI: 10.1186/s13054-021-03615-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Crit Care        ISSN: 1364-8535            Impact factor:   9.097


  42 in total

1.  Recruitment and derecruitment during acute respiratory failure: a clinical study.

Authors:  S Crotti; D Mascheroni; P Caironi; P Pelosi; G Ronzoni; M Mondino; J J Marini; L Gattinoni
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2001-07-01       Impact factor: 21.405

2.  Mechanism of airway closure in acute respiratory distress syndrome: a possible role of surfactant depletion.

Authors:  Remi Coudroy; Cong Lu; Lu Chen; Alexandre Demoule; Laurent Brochard
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2018-12-17       Impact factor: 17.440

3.  Positive end-expiratory pressure redistributes perfusion to dependent lung regions in supine but not in prone lambs.

Authors:  S M Walther; K B Domino; R W Glenny; M P Hlastala
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 7.598

4.  Airway Closure in Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: An Underestimated and Misinterpreted Phenomenon.

Authors:  Lu Chen; Lorenzo Del Sorbo; Domenico Luca Grieco; Orest Shklar; Detajin Junhasavasdikul; Irene Telias; Eddy Fan; Laurent Brochard
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2018-01-01       Impact factor: 21.405

5.  Vascular components of ARDS. Clinical pulmonary hemodynamics and morphology.

Authors:  W M Zapol; R Jones
Journal:  Am Rev Respir Dis       Date:  1987-08

6.  Pulmonary microthrombosis in severe adult respiratory distress syndrome.

Authors:  S Vesconi; G P Rossi; A Pesenti; R Fumagalli; L Gattinoni
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  1988-02       Impact factor: 7.598

Review 7.  Diffuse alveolar damage--the role of oxygen, shock, and related factors. A review.

Authors:  A L Katzenstein; C M Bloor; A A Leibow
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  1976-10       Impact factor: 4.307

8.  Short-term Physiologic Consequences of Regional Pulmonary Vascular Occlusion in Pigs.

Authors:  Thomas Langer; Valentina Castagna; Serena Brusatori; Alessandro Santini; Tommaso Mauri; Alberto Zanella; Antonio Pesenti
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 7.892

9.  Importance of hypoxic vasoconstriction in maintaining oxygenation during acute lung injury.

Authors:  Serge Brimioulle; Valérie Julien; René Gust; James K Kozlowski; Robert Naeije; Daniel P Schuster
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 7.598

10.  Compressive forces and computed tomography-derived positive end-expiratory pressure in acute respiratory distress syndrome.

Authors:  Massimo Cressoni; Davide Chiumello; Eleonora Carlesso; Chiara Chiurazzi; Martina Amini; Matteo Brioni; Paolo Cadringher; Michael Quintel; Luciano Gattinoni
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 7.892

View more
  6 in total

1.  Effects of PEEP on regional ventilation-perfusion mismatch in the acute respiratory distress syndrome.

Authors:  Bertrand Pavlovsky; Antonio Pesenti; Elena Spinelli; Gaetano Scaramuzzo; Ines Marongiu; Paola Tagliabue; Savino Spadaro; Giacomo Grasselli; Alain Mercat; Tommaso Mauri
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2022-07-11       Impact factor: 19.334

2.  Inhaled CO2 vs. Hypercapnia Obtained by Low Tidal Volume or Instrumental Dead Space in Unilateral Pulmonary Artery Ligation: Any Difference for Lung Protection?

Authors:  Elena Spinelli; Antonio Pesenti; Gianluca Lopez; Anna Damia; Francesco Damarco; Erica Garbelli; Gaia Dal Santo; Alessio Caccioppola; Giorgio Giudici; Virginia Figgiaconi; Osvaldo Biancolilli; Michele Battistin; Caterina Lonati; Valentina Vaira; Lorenzo Rosso; Stefano Ferrero; Stefano Gatti; Tommaso Mauri
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-05-20

3.  Prone positioning improves ventilation-perfusion matching assessed by electrical impedance tomography in patients with ARDS: a prospective physiological study.

Authors:  Yu-Xian Wang; Ming Zhong; Min-Hui Dong; Jie-Qiong Song; Yi-Jun Zheng; Wei Wu; Jia-le Tao; Ling Zhu; Xin Zheng
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2022-05-27       Impact factor: 19.334

4.  Effects of Prone Position on Lung Recruitment and Ventilation-Perfusion Matching in Patients With COVID-19 Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: A Combined CT Scan/Electrical Impedance Tomography Study.

Authors:  Tommaso Fossali; Bertrand Pavlovsky; Davide Ottolina; Riccardo Colombo; Maria Cristina Basile; Antonio Castelli; Roberto Rech; Beatrice Borghi; Andrea Ianniello; Nicola Flor; Elena Spinelli; Emanuele Catena; Tommaso Mauri
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2022-04-11       Impact factor: 9.296

Review 5.  Prone positioning in ARDS patients supported with VV ECMO, what we should explore?

Authors:  Hongling Zhang; Zhengdong Liu; Huaqing Shu; Yuan Yu; Xiaobo Yang; Ruiting Li; Jiqian Xu; Xiaojing Zou; You Shang
Journal:  J Intensive Care       Date:  2022-10-04

Review 6.  New Frontiers in Functional and Molecular Imaging of the Acutely Injured Lung: Pathophysiological Insights and Research Applications.

Authors:  Guido Musch
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2021-12-09       Impact factor: 4.566

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.