Literature DB >> 23707773

Identification of putative estrogen receptor-mediated endocrine disrupting chemicals using QSAR- and structure-based virtual screening approaches.

Liying Zhang1, Alexander Sedykh, Ashutosh Tripathi, Hao Zhu, Antreas Afantitis, Varnavas D Mouchlis, Georgia Melagraki, Ivan Rusyn, Alexander Tropsha.   

Abstract

Identification of endocrine disrupting chemicals is one of the important goals of environmental chemical hazard screening. We report on the development of validated in silico predictors of chemicals likely to cause estrogen receptor (ER)-mediated endocrine disruption to facilitate their prioritization for future screening. A database of relative binding affinity of a large number of ERα and/or ERβ ligands was assembled (546 for ERα and 137 for ERβ). Both single-task learning (STL) and multi-task learning (MTL) continuous quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) models were developed for predicting ligand binding affinity to ERα or ERβ. High predictive accuracy was achieved for ERα binding affinity (MTL R(2)=0.71, STL R(2)=0.73). For ERβ binding affinity, MTL models were significantly more predictive (R(2)=0.53, p<0.05) than STL models. In addition, docking studies were performed on a set of ER agonists/antagonists (67 agonists and 39 antagonists for ERα, 48 agonists and 32 antagonists for ERβ, supplemented by putative decoys/non-binders) using the following ER structures (in complexes with respective ligands) retrieved from the Protein Data Bank: ERα agonist (PDB ID: 1L2I), ERα antagonist (PDB ID: 3DT3), ERβ agonist (PDB ID: 2NV7), and ERβ antagonist (PDB ID: 1L2J). We found that all four ER conformations discriminated their corresponding ligands from presumed non-binders. Finally, both QSAR models and ER structures were employed in parallel to virtually screen several large libraries of environmental chemicals to derive a ligand- and structure-based prioritized list of putative estrogenic compounds to be used for in vitro and in vivo experimental validation.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  17β-estradiol; AD; ADMET; AR; AUC; AhR; Docking; E(2); EDCs; EDKB; EDSP; EF; EPA; ER; Endocrine disrupting chemicals; Estrogen receptor; MTL; Multi-task learning; PDB; Protein Data Bank; QSAR; Quantitative structure–activity relationships modeling; RBA; ROC; RP; SE; SP; STL; US Environmental Protection Agency; Virtual screening; absorption, distribution, metabolism, excretion, and toxicity; androgen receptor; applicability domain; area under the curve; aryl hydrocarbon receptor; endocrine disrupting chemicals; endocrine disruptor knowledge base; endocrine disruptor screening program; enrichment factor; estrogen receptor; k-nearest neighbors; kNN; multi-task learning; quantitative structure–activity relationships; receiver operating characteristic; relative binding affinity; relative potency; sensitivity; single-task learning; specificity

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23707773      PMCID: PMC3775906          DOI: 10.1016/j.taap.2013.04.032

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Toxicol Appl Pharmacol        ISSN: 0041-008X            Impact factor:   4.219


  44 in total

1.  Novel variable selection quantitative structure--property relationship approach based on the k-nearest-neighbor principle

Authors: 
Journal:  J Chem Inf Comput Sci       Date:  2000-01

2.  Rational selection of training and test sets for the development of validated QSAR models.

Authors:  Alexander Golbraikh; Min Shen; Zhiyan Xiao; Yun-De Xiao; Kuo-Hsiung Lee; Alexander Tropsha
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2003 Feb-Apr       Impact factor: 3.686

3.  Glide: a new approach for rapid, accurate docking and scoring. 1. Method and assessment of docking accuracy.

Authors:  Richard A Friesner; Jay L Banks; Robert B Murphy; Thomas A Halgren; Jasna J Klicic; Daniel T Mainz; Matthew P Repasky; Eric H Knoll; Mee Shelley; Jason K Perry; David E Shaw; Perry Francis; Peter S Shenkin
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2004-03-25       Impact factor: 7.446

4.  Extra precision glide: docking and scoring incorporating a model of hydrophobic enclosure for protein-ligand complexes.

Authors:  Richard A Friesner; Robert B Murphy; Matthew P Repasky; Leah L Frye; Jeremy R Greenwood; Thomas A Halgren; Paul C Sanschagrin; Daniel T Mainz
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2006-10-19       Impact factor: 7.446

5.  QSAR and mechanistic interpretation of estrogen receptor binding.

Authors:  R Serafimova; M Todorov; D Nedelcheva; T Pavlov; Y Akahori; M Nakai; O Mekenyan
Journal:  SAR QSAR Environ Res       Date:  2007 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.000

Review 6.  Estrogen receptors and endocrine diseases: lessons from estrogen receptor knockout mice.

Authors:  S O Mueller; K S Korach
Journal:  Curr Opin Pharmacol       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 5.547

7.  QSAR modeling of the blood-brain barrier permeability for diverse organic compounds.

Authors:  Liying Zhang; Hao Zhu; Tudor I Oprea; Alexander Golbraikh; Alexander Tropsha
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2008-06-14       Impact factor: 4.200

8.  Conformational dynamics of the estrogen receptor alpha: molecular dynamics simulations of the influence of binding site structure on protein dynamics.

Authors:  Leyla Celik; Julie Davey Dalsgaard Lund; Birgit Schiøtt
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2007-01-24       Impact factor: 3.162

9.  Pharmacophore and QSAR modeling of estrogen receptor beta ligands and subsequent validation and in silico search for new hits.

Authors:  Mutasem O Taha; Mai Tarairah; Hiba Zalloum; Ghassan Abu-Sheikha
Journal:  J Mol Graph Model       Date:  2009-09-30       Impact factor: 2.518

10.  The EDKB: an established knowledge base for endocrine disrupting chemicals.

Authors:  Don Ding; Lei Xu; Hong Fang; Huixiao Hong; Roger Perkins; Steve Harris; Edward D Bearden; Leming Shi; Weida Tong
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2010-10-07       Impact factor: 3.169

View more
  25 in total

1.  Mechanism-Driven Read-Across of Chemical Hepatotoxicants Based on Chemical Structures and Biological Data.

Authors:  Linlin Zhao; Daniel P Russo; Wenyi Wang; Lauren M Aleksunes; Hao Zhu
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2020-04-01       Impact factor: 4.849

2.  Adverse outcome pathway (AOP) development I: strategies and principles.

Authors:  Daniel L Villeneuve; Doug Crump; Natàlia Garcia-Reyero; Markus Hecker; Thomas H Hutchinson; Carlie A LaLone; Brigitte Landesmann; Teresa Lettieri; Sharon Munn; Malgorzata Nepelska; Mary Ann Ottinger; Lucia Vergauwen; Maurice Whelan
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 4.849

3.  Integration of in silico methods and computational systems biology to explore endocrine-disrupting chemical binding with nuclear hormone receptors.

Authors:  P Ruiz; A Sack; M Wampole; S Bobst; M Vracko
Journal:  Chemosphere       Date:  2017-03-09       Impact factor: 7.086

4.  Assessment of the Endocrine-Disrupting Effects of Trichloroethylene and Its Metabolites Using in Vitro and in Silico Approaches.

Authors:  Phum Tachachartvanich; Rapeepat Sangsuwan; Heather S Ruiz; Sylvia S Sanchez; Kathleen A Durkin; Luoping Zhang; Martyn T Smith
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2018-01-19       Impact factor: 9.028

5.  In silico identification and pharmacological evaluation of novel endocrine disrupting chemicals that act via the ligand-binding domain of the estrogen receptor α.

Authors:  Fiona M McRobb; Irina Kufareva; Ruben Abagyan
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2014-06-13       Impact factor: 4.849

6.  Predictive Modeling of Estrogen Receptor Binding Agents Using Advanced Cheminformatics Tools and Massive Public Data.

Authors:  Kathryn Ribay; Marlene T Kim; Wenyi Wang; Daniel Pinolini; Hao Zhu
Journal:  Front Environ Sci       Date:  2016-03-08

7.  Comparing Multiple Machine Learning Algorithms and Metrics for Estrogen Receptor Binding Prediction.

Authors:  Daniel P Russo; Kimberley M Zorn; Alex M Clark; Hao Zhu; Sean Ekins
Journal:  Mol Pharm       Date:  2018-08-28       Impact factor: 4.939

8.  Prediction of binding affinity and efficacy of thyroid hormone receptor ligands using QSAR and structure-based modeling methods.

Authors:  Regina Politi; Ivan Rusyn; Alexander Tropsha
Journal:  Toxicol Appl Pharmacol       Date:  2014-07-21       Impact factor: 4.219

9.  Machine Learning Models for Estrogen Receptor Bioactivity and Endocrine Disruption Prediction.

Authors:  Kimberley M Zorn; Daniel H Foil; Thomas R Lane; Daniel P Russo; Wendy Hillwalker; David J Feifarek; Frank Jones; William D Klaren; Ashley M Brinkman; Sean Ekins
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2020-09-15       Impact factor: 9.028

10.  Competitive molecular docking approach for predicting estrogen receptor subtype α agonists and antagonists.

Authors:  Hui Wen Ng; Wenqian Zhang; Mao Shu; Heng Luo; Weigong Ge; Roger Perkins; Weida Tong; Huixiao Hong
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2014-10-21       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.