| Literature DB >> 23707773 |
Liying Zhang1, Alexander Sedykh, Ashutosh Tripathi, Hao Zhu, Antreas Afantitis, Varnavas D Mouchlis, Georgia Melagraki, Ivan Rusyn, Alexander Tropsha.
Abstract
Identification of endocrine disrupting <span class="Disease">chemicals is one of the important goals of environmental chemical haz<span class="Gene">ard screening. We report on the development of validated in silico predictors of chemicals likely to cause estrogen receptor (ER)-mediated endocrine disruption to facilitate their prioritization for future screening. A database of relative binding affinity of a large number of ERα and/or ERβ ligands was assembled (546 for ERα and 137 for ERβ). Both single-task learning (STL) and multi-task learning (MTL) continuous quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) models were developed for predicting ligand binding affinity to ERα or ERβ. High predictive accuracy was achieved for ERα binding affinity (MTL R(2)=0.71, STL R(2)=0.73). For ERβ binding affinity, MTL models were significantly more predictive (R(2)=0.53, p<0.05) than STL models. In addition, docking studies were performed on a set of ER agonists/antagonists (67 agonists and 39 antagonists for ERα, 48 agonists and 32 antagonists for ERβ, supplemented by putative decoys/non-binders) using the following ER structures (in complexes with respective ligands) retrieved from the Protein Data Bank: ERα agonist (PDB ID: 1L2I), ERα antagonist (PDB ID: 3DT3), ERβ agonist (PDB ID: 2NV7), and ERβ antagonist (PDB ID: 1L2J). We found that all four ER conformations discriminated their corresponding ligands from presumed non-binders. Finally, both QSAR models and ER structures were employed in parallel to virtually screen several large libraries of environmental chemicals to derive a ligand- and structure-based prioritized list of putative estrogenic compounds to be used for in vitro and in vivo experimental validation.Entities:
Keywords: 17β-estradiol; AD; ADMET; AR; AUC; AhR; Docking; E(2); EDCs; EDKB; EDSP; EF; EPA; ER; Endocrine disrupting chemicals; Estrogen receptor; MTL; Multi-task learning; PDB; Protein Data Bank; QSAR; Quantitative structure–activity relationships modeling; RBA; ROC; RP; SE; SP; STL; US Environmental Protection Agency; Virtual screening; absorption, distribution, metabolism, excretion, and toxicity; androgen receptor; applicability domain; area under the curve; aryl hydrocarbon receptor; endocrine disrupting chemicals; endocrine disruptor knowledge base; endocrine disruptor screening program; enrichment factor; estrogen receptor; k-nearest neighbors; kNN; multi-task learning; quantitative structure–activity relationships; receiver operating characteristic; relative binding affinity; relative potency; sensitivity; single-task learning; specificity
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2013 PMID: 23707773 PMCID: PMC3775906 DOI: 10.1016/j.taap.2013.04.032
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Toxicol Appl Pharmacol ISSN: 0041-008X Impact factor: 4.219