Literature DB >> 23707773

Identification of putative estrogen receptor-mediated endocrine disrupting chemicals using QSAR- and structure-based virtual screening approaches.

Liying Zhang1, Alexander Sedykh, Ashutosh Tripathi, Hao Zhu, Antreas Afantitis, Varnavas D Mouchlis, Georgia Melagraki, Ivan Rusyn, Alexander Tropsha.   

Abstract

Identification of endocrine disrupting <span class="Disease">chemicals is one of the important goals of environmental chemical haz<span class="Gene">ard screening. We report on the development of validated in silico predictors of chemicals likely to cause estrogen receptor (ER)-mediated endocrine disruption to facilitate their prioritization for future screening. A database of relative binding affinity of a large number of ERα and/or ERβ ligands was assembled (546 for ERα and 137 for ERβ). Both single-task learning (STL) and multi-task learning (MTL) continuous quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) models were developed for predicting ligand binding affinity to ERα or ERβ. High predictive accuracy was achieved for ERα binding affinity (MTL R(2)=0.71, STL R(2)=0.73). For ERβ binding affinity, MTL models were significantly more predictive (R(2)=0.53, p<0.05) than STL models. In addition, docking studies were performed on a set of ER agonists/antagonists (67 agonists and 39 antagonists for ERα, 48 agonists and 32 antagonists for ERβ, supplemented by putative decoys/non-binders) using the following ER structures (in complexes with respective ligands) retrieved from the Protein Data Bank: ERα agonist (PDB ID: 1L2I), ERα antagonist (PDB ID: 3DT3), ERβ agonist (PDB ID: 2NV7), and ERβ antagonist (PDB ID: 1L2J). We found that all four ER conformations discriminated their corresponding ligands from presumed non-binders. Finally, both QSAR models and ER structures were employed in parallel to virtually screen several large libraries of environmental chemicals to derive a ligand- and structure-based prioritized list of putative estrogenic compounds to be used for in vitro and in vivo experimental validation.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  17β-estradiol; AD; ADMET; AR; AUC; AhR; Docking; E(2); EDCs; EDKB; EDSP; EF; EPA; ER; Endocrine disrupting chemicals; Estrogen receptor; MTL; Multi-task learning; PDB; Protein Data Bank; QSAR; Quantitative structure–activity relationships modeling; RBA; ROC; RP; SE; SP; STL; US Environmental Protection Agency; Virtual screening; absorption, distribution, metabolism, excretion, and toxicity; androgen receptor; applicability domain; area under the curve; aryl hydrocarbon receptor; endocrine disrupting chemicals; endocrine disruptor knowledge base; endocrine disruptor screening program; enrichment factor; estrogen receptor; k-nearest neighbors; kNN; multi-task learning; quantitative structure–activity relationships; receiver operating characteristic; relative binding affinity; relative potency; sensitivity; single-task learning; specificity

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23707773      PMCID: PMC3775906          DOI: 10.1016/j.taap.2013.04.032

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Toxicol Appl Pharmacol        ISSN: 0041-008X            Impact factor:   4.219


  44 in total

1.  Novel variable selection quantitative structure--property relationship approach based on the k-nearest-neighbor principle

Authors: 
Journal:  J Chem Inf Comput Sci       Date:  2000-01

2.  Rational selection of training and test sets for the development of validated QSAR models.

Authors:  Alexander Golbraikh; Min Shen; Zhiyan Xiao; Yun-De Xiao; Kuo-Hsiung Lee; Alexander Tropsha
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2003 Feb-Apr       Impact factor: 3.686

3.  Glide: a new approach for rapid, accurate docking and scoring. 1. Method and assessment of docking accuracy.

Authors:  Richard A Friesner; Jay L Banks; Robert B Murphy; Thomas A Halgren; Jasna J Klicic; Daniel T Mainz; Matthew P Repasky; Eric H Knoll; Mee Shelley; Jason K Perry; David E Shaw; Perry Francis; Peter S Shenkin
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2004-03-25       Impact factor: 7.446

4.  Extra precision glide: docking and scoring incorporating a model of hydrophobic enclosure for protein-ligand complexes.

Authors:  Richard A Friesner; Robert B Murphy; Matthew P Repasky; Leah L Frye; Jeremy R Greenwood; Thomas A Halgren; Paul C Sanschagrin; Daniel T Mainz
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2006-10-19       Impact factor: 7.446

5.  QSAR and mechanistic interpretation of estrogen receptor binding.

Authors:  R Serafimova; M Todorov; D Nedelcheva; T Pavlov; Y Akahori; M Nakai; O Mekenyan
Journal:  SAR QSAR Environ Res       Date:  2007 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.000

Review 6.  Estrogen receptors and endocrine diseases: lessons from estrogen receptor knockout mice.

Authors:  S O Mueller; K S Korach
Journal:  Curr Opin Pharmacol       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 5.547

7.  QSAR modeling of the blood-brain barrier permeability for diverse organic compounds.

Authors:  Liying Zhang; Hao Zhu; Tudor I Oprea; Alexander Golbraikh; Alexander Tropsha
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2008-06-14       Impact factor: 4.200

8.  Conformational dynamics of the estrogen receptor alpha: molecular dynamics simulations of the influence of binding site structure on protein dynamics.

Authors:  Leyla Celik; Julie Davey Dalsgaard Lund; Birgit Schiøtt
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2007-01-24       Impact factor: 3.162

9.  Pharmacophore and QSAR modeling of estrogen receptor beta ligands and subsequent validation and in silico search for new hits.

Authors:  Mutasem O Taha; Mai Tarairah; Hiba Zalloum; Ghassan Abu-Sheikha
Journal:  J Mol Graph Model       Date:  2009-09-30       Impact factor: 2.518

10.  The EDKB: an established knowledge base for endocrine disrupting chemicals.

Authors:  Don Ding; Lei Xu; Hong Fang; Huixiao Hong; Roger Perkins; Steve Harris; Edward D Bearden; Leming Shi; Weida Tong
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2010-10-07       Impact factor: 3.169

View more
  25 in total

1.  Mechanism-Driven Read-Across of Chemical Hepatotoxicants Based on Chemical Structures and Biological Data.

Authors:  Linlin Zhao; Daniel P Russo; Wenyi Wang; Lauren M Aleksunes; Hao Zhu
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2020-04-01       Impact factor: 4.849

2.  Adverse outcome pathway (AOP) development I: strategies and principles.

Authors:  Daniel L Villeneuve; Doug Crump; Natàlia Garcia-Reyero; Markus Hecker; Thomas H Hutchinson; Carlie A LaLone; Brigitte Landesmann; Teresa Lettieri; Sharon Munn; Malgorzata Nepelska; Mary Ann Ottinger; Lucia Vergauwen; Maurice Whelan
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 4.849

3.  Integration of in silico methods and computational systems biology to explore endocrine-disrupting chemical binding with nuclear hormone receptors.

Authors:  P Ruiz; A Sack; M Wampole; S Bobst; M Vracko
Journal:  Chemosphere       Date:  2017-03-09       Impact factor: 7.086

4.  Assessment of the Endocrine-Disrupting Effects of Trichloroethylene and Its Metabolites Using in Vitro and in Silico Approaches.

Authors:  Phum Tachachartvanich; Rapeepat Sangsuwan; Heather S Ruiz; Sylvia S Sanchez; Kathleen A Durkin; Luoping Zhang; Martyn T Smith
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2018-01-19       Impact factor: 9.028

5.  In silico identification and pharmacological evaluation of novel endocrine disrupting chemicals that act via the ligand-binding domain of the estrogen receptor α.

Authors:  Fiona M McRobb; Irina Kufareva; Ruben Abagyan
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2014-06-13       Impact factor: 4.849

6.  Predictive Modeling of Estrogen Receptor Binding Agents Using Advanced Cheminformatics Tools and Massive Public Data.

Authors:  Kathryn Ribay; Marlene T Kim; Wenyi Wang; Daniel Pinolini; Hao Zhu
Journal:  Front Environ Sci       Date:  2016-03-08

7.  Comparing Multiple Machine Learning Algorithms and Metrics for Estrogen Receptor Binding Prediction.

Authors:  Daniel P Russo; Kimberley M Zorn; Alex M Clark; Hao Zhu; Sean Ekins
Journal:  Mol Pharm       Date:  2018-08-28       Impact factor: 4.939

8.  Prediction of binding affinity and efficacy of thyroid hormone receptor ligands using QSAR and structure-based modeling methods.

Authors:  Regina Politi; Ivan Rusyn; Alexander Tropsha
Journal:  Toxicol Appl Pharmacol       Date:  2014-07-21       Impact factor: 4.219

9.  Machine Learning Models for Estrogen Receptor Bioactivity and Endocrine Disruption Prediction.

Authors:  Kimberley M Zorn; Daniel H Foil; Thomas R Lane; Daniel P Russo; Wendy Hillwalker; David J Feifarek; Frank Jones; William D Klaren; Ashley M Brinkman; Sean Ekins
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2020-09-15       Impact factor: 9.028

10.  Competitive molecular docking approach for predicting estrogen receptor subtype α agonists and antagonists.

Authors:  Hui Wen Ng; Wenqian Zhang; Mao Shu; Heng Luo; Weigong Ge; Roger Perkins; Weida Tong; Huixiao Hong
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2014-10-21       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.