Literature DB >> 32856846

Exploring the Barriers to Cervical Cancer Screening through the Lens of Implementers and Beneficiaries of the National Screening Program: A Multi-Contextual Study.

Jyoshma Preema Dsouza1, Stephan Van Den Broucke1, Sanjay Pattanshetty2, William Dhoore1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Cervical cancer is a major reason for morbidity and mortality in Low and Middle income countries. The National Programme for Prevention and Control of Cancers, Diabetes, Cardiovascular Diseases and Stroke (NPCDCS) sets out broad national guideline to implement Cervical cancer screening. However, an implementation strategy for cervical cancer screening is not in place for districts. Although opportunistic screening takes place, implementation is hindered by psychological and physical barriers for women, as well as insufficient capacity on the part of implementers. This qualitative study aims to identify the specific barriers that prevent the uptake of cervical cancer screening.
METHODS: Women who could benefit from cervical cancer program were interviewed to explore the factors that influenced their uptake of the cervical screening offered. Key informant interviews were conducted with implementers of the NPCDCS and with public health staff of three States (Himachal Pradesh, Meghalaya and Karnataka), to understand their perception of determinants of the utilization of screening services.
RESULTS: The general health concern among the participants was low, and routine check-ups were considered unimportant. Poor knowledge about cervical cancer, benefits of screening service availability, as well as a general sense of well-being, embarrassment or anxiety related to the screening procedure, fear of being judged for lack of modesty, and stigma were common barriers to screening uptake. In addition to a general unawareness of cervical cancer geographical inaccessibility of screening as a barrier to participate in cervical cancer screening, in certain regions.
CONCLUSION: It is essential to increase the knowledge on cervical cancer and on the benefits of screening among Indian women. Providing information and cues to action by health workers and professionals can facilitate the decision to participate. Implementers need to be involved to ensure context specific implementation of the National programme to overcome these barriers.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cancer Prevention; Cervical cancer; India; Low-middle-income countries; Screening

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32856846      PMCID: PMC7771922          DOI: 10.31557/APJCP.2020.21.8.2209

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Asian Pac J Cancer Prev        ISSN: 1513-7368


  22 in total

1.  Determinants of VIA (Visual Inspection of the Cervix After Acetic Acid Application) positivity in cervical cancer screening of women in a peri-urban area in Andhra Pradesh, India.

Authors:  Haripriya Vedantham; Michelle I Silver; B Kalpana; C Rekha; B P Karuna; K Vidyadhari; S Mrudula; Brigitte M Ronnett; K Vijayaraghavan; Gayatri Ramakrishna; Pavani Sowjanya; Shantha Laxmi; Keerti V Shah; Patti E Gravitt
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 4.254

2.  Three approaches to qualitative content analysis.

Authors:  Hsiu-Fang Hsieh; Sarah E Shannon
Journal:  Qual Health Res       Date:  2005-11

3.  Quality Of Health Care In India: Challenges, Priorities, And The Road Ahead.

Authors:  Manoj Mohanan; Katherine Hay; Nachiket Mor
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2016-10-01       Impact factor: 6.301

4.  Barriers to cervical cancer screening: a qualitative study with women in Serbia.

Authors:  Milica Markovic; Vesna Kesic; Lidija Topic; Bojana Matejic
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2005-06-13       Impact factor: 4.634

5.  Barriers and facilitators to cervical cancer screening in Nepal: A qualitative study.

Authors:  Elisabeth Darj; Pratibha Chalise; Sunila Shakya
Journal:  Sex Reprod Healthc       Date:  2019-02-07

6.  Cervical cancer screening attitudes and beliefs of Malaysian women who have never had a pap smear: a qualitative study.

Authors:  L P Wong; Y L Wong; W Y Low; E M Khoo; R Shuib
Journal:  Int J Behav Med       Date:  2008

7.  The Effect of Education on Women's Practice Based on the Health Belief Model About Pap Smear Test.

Authors:  Asiyeh Pirzadeh; Maryam Amidi Mazaheri
Journal:  Int J Prev Med       Date:  2012-08

8.  Barriers to cervical cancer screening in Mulanje, Malawi: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Victoria K Fort; Mary Sue Makin; Aaron J Siegler; Kevin Ault; Roger Rochat
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2011-03-14       Impact factor: 2.711

9.  Cervical cancer screening: Current knowledge & practice among women in a rural population of Kerala, India.

Authors:  S Aswathy; Mariya Amin Quereshi; Beteena Kurian; K Leelamoni
Journal:  Indian J Med Res       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 2.375

10.  Awareness and knowledge of cervical cancer and its prevention among the nursing staff of a tertiary health institute in Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India.

Authors:  V Shah; S Vyas; A Singh; M Shrivastava
Journal:  Ecancermedicalscience       Date:  2012-09-25
View more
  3 in total

1.  A comparison of behavioural models explaining cervical cancer screening uptake.

Authors:  Jyoshma Preema Dsouza; Stephan Van den Broucke; Sanjay Pattanshetty; William Dhoore
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2022-06-16       Impact factor: 2.742

Review 2.  Cervical Cancer: Formulation and Implementation of Govt of India Guidelines for Screening and Management.

Authors:  Ravi Mehrotra; Kavita Yadav
Journal:  Indian J Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2021-12-27

3.  Sociodemographic correlates of cervix, breast and oral cancer screening among Indian women.

Authors:  Zhu Changkun; Ghose Bishwajit; Lu Ji; Shangfeng Tang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-05-11       Impact factor: 3.752

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.